Research Article
An Analytic Hierarchy Model for Classification Algorithms Selection in Credit Risk Analysis
Table 5
Ranking of MCDM methods of German credit dataset.
| Algorithm | TOPSIS | PROMETHEE II | VIKOR | GRA | Value | Rank | Value | Rank | Value | Rank | Value | Rank |
| BNK | 0.5807 | 7 | −0.2699 | 6 | 0.8434 | 8 | 0.5921 | 5 | NBS | 0.9529 | 1 | 0.7381 | 2 | 0.0091 | 1 | 0.7952 | 3 | LRN | 0.9332 | 2 | 0.7778 | 1 | 0.0476 | 2 | 0.8939 | 2 | J48 | 0.6608 | 5 | −0.4127 | 8 | 0.6404 | 6 | 0.5680 | 7 | NBTree | 0.5986 | 6 | −0.3135 | 7 | 0.7557 | 7 | 0.5728 | 6 | IB1 | 0.4703 | 10 | −0.5635 | 10 | 1.0000 | 10 | 0.4273 | 10 | IBK | 0.5583 | 8 | −0.5476 | 9 | 0.9863 | 9 | 0.4488 | 9 | SMO | 0.7944 | 4 | 0.3412 | 3 | 0.2932 | 3 | 0.9274 | 1 | RBF | 0.8087 | 3 | 0.2421 | 4 | 0.3082 | 4 | 0.6564 | 4 | MLP | 0.5511 | 9 | 0.0080 | 5 | 0.3268 | 5 | 0.5451 | 8 |
|
|