Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2014, Article ID 319264, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/319264
Research Article

Multiscale Probability Transformation of Basic Probability Assignment

Meizhu Li,1 Xi Lu,1,2 Qi Zhang,1 and Yong Deng1,3,4

1School of Computer and Information Science, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
2School of Hanhong, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
3School of Automation, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710072, China
4School of Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA

Received 16 June 2014; Accepted 2 October 2014; Published 20 October 2014

Academic Editor: Mohamed Abd El Aziz

Copyright © 2014 Meizhu Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. P. Dempster, “Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping,” The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 325–339, 1967. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  2. G. Shafer, A Mathematical Theory of Evidence, vol. 1, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 1976. View at MathSciNet
  3. R. P. Srivastava and L. Liu, “Applications of belief functions in business decisions: a review,” Information Systems Frontiers, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 359–378, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. T. Denœux, “Maximum likelihood estimation from fuzzy data using the EM algorithm,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 183, no. 1, pp. 72–91, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  5. D. Wei, X. Deng, X. Zhang, Y. Deng, and S. Mahadevan, “Identifying influential nodes in weighted networks based on evidence theory,” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, vol. 392, no. 10, pp. 2564–2575, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. F. Cuzzolin, “A geometric approach to the theory of evidence,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics Part C: Applications and Reviews, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 522–534, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. Y. Yang, D. Han, C. Han, and F. Cao, “A novel approximation of basic probability assignment based on rank-level fusion,” Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 993–999, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  8. M.-H. Masson and T. Denœux, “ECM: an evidential version of the fuzzy c-means algorithm,” Pattern Recognition, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 1384–1397, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. Z.-G. Liu, Q. Pan, and J. Dezert, “Evidential classifier for imprecise data based on belief functions,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 52, pp. 246–257, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. L. Livi, H. Tahayori, A. Sadeghian, and A. Rizzi, “Distinguishability of interval type-2 fuzzy sets data by analyzing upper and lower membership functions,” Applied Soft Computing Journal, vol. 17, pp. 79–89, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. S. Agrawal, R. Panda, and L. Dora, “A study on fuzzy clustering for magnetic resonance brain image segmentation using soft computing approaches,” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 24, pp. 522–533, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. J. Liu, Y. Li, R. Sadiq, and Y. Deng, “Quantifying influence of weather indices on pm based on relation map,” Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 1323–1331, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  13. S. Huang, X. Su, Y. Hu, S. Mahadevan, and Y. Deng, “A new decision-making method by incomplete preferences based on evidence distance,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 56, pp. 264–272, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. C. S. Lin, C. T. Chen, F. S. Chen, and W. Z. Hung, “A novel multiperson game approach for linguistic multicriteria decision making problems,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2014, Article ID 592326, 20 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  15. B. Kang, Y. Deng, R. Sadiq, and S. Mahadevan, “Evidential cognitive maps,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 35, pp. 77–86, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. T. Denoeux, “Maximum likelihood estimation from uncertain data in the belief function framework,” IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 119–130, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. X. Zhang, Y. Deng, F. T. S. Chan, P. Xu, S. Mahadevan, and Y. Hu, “IFSJSP: a novel methodology for the Job-Shop Scheduling Problem based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 51, no. 17, pp. 5100–5119, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. X. Deng, Y. Hu, Y. Deng, and S. Mahadevan, “Supplier selection using AHP methodology extended by D numbers,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 156–167, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. S. Chen, Y. Deng, and J. Wu, “Fuzzy sensor fusion based on evidence theory and its application,” Applied Artificial Intelligence, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 235–248, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. X. Deng, Y. Hu, Y. Deng, and S. Mahadevan, “Environmental impact assessment based on D numbers,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 635–643, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. C. Zhang, Y. Hu, F. T. Chan, R. Sadiq, and Y. Deng, “A new method to determine basic probability assignment using core samples,” Knowledge—Based Systems, vol. 69, pp. 140–149, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. T. Burger and S. Destercke, “How to randomly generate mass functions,” International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowlege-Based Systems, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 645–673, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. Z.-G. Liu, Q. Pan, and J. Dezert, “A belief classification rule for imprecise data,” Applied Intelligence, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 214–228, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. M. E. Basiri, A. R. Naghsh-Nilchi, and N. Ghasem-Aghaee, “Sentiment prediction based on dempster-shafer theory of evidence,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2014, Article ID 361201, 13 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. X. Deng, X. Lu, F. T. Chan, R. Sadiq, S. Mahadevan, and Y. Deng, “D-CFPR: D numbers extended consistent fuzzy preference relations,” Knowledge-Based Systems, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. F. Karahan and S. Ozkan, “On the persistence of income shocks over the life cycle: evidence, theory, and implications,” Review of Economic Dynamics, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 452–476, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. Z. Zhang, C. Jiang, X. Han, D. Hu, and S. Yu, “A response surface approach for structural reliability analysis using evidence theory,” Advances in Engineering Software, vol. 69, pp. 37–45, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. X. Zhang, Y. Deng, F. T. Chan, A. Adamatzky, and S. Mahadevan, “Supplier selection based on evidence theory and analytic network process,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. L. A. Zadeh, “A simple view of the dempster-shafer theory of evidence and its implication for the rule of combination,” The AI Magazine, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 85–90, 1986. View at Google Scholar
  30. R. R. Yager, “On the dempster-shafer framework and new combination rules,” Information Sciences, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 93–137, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  31. P. Smets, “Combination of evidence in the transferable belief model,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 447–458, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. C. K. Murphy, “Combining belief functions when evidence conflicts,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. W. Liu, “Analyzing the degree of conflict among belief functions,” Artificial Intelligence, vol. 170, no. 11, pp. 909–924, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  34. E. Lefèvre and Z. Elouedi, “How to preserve the conflict as an alarm in the combination of belief functions?” Decision Support Systems, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 326–333, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. P. Smets and R. Kennes, “The transferable belief model,” Artificial Intelligence, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 191–234, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  36. P. Smets, “Decision making in the TBM: the necessity of the pignistic transformation,” International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 133–147, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  37. B. R. Cobb and P. P. Shenoy, “On the plausibility transformation method for translating belief function models to probability models,” International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 314–330, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  38. M. Daniel, “On transformations of belief functions to probabilities,” International Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 261–282, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  39. J. M. Merigó and M. Casanovas, “Decision making with Dempster-Shafer theory using fuzzy induced aggregation operators,” in Recent Developments in the Ordered Weighted Averaging Operators: Theory and Practice, vol. 265 of Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, pp. 209–228, Springer, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  40. E. Nusrat and K. Yamada, “A descriptive decision-making model under uncertainty: combination of dempster-sha fer theory and prospect theory,” International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowlege-Based Systems, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 79–102, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. C. Tsallis, “Possible generalization of Boltzmann-Gibbs statistics,” Journal of Statistical Physics, vol. 52, no. 1-2, pp. 479–487, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus