Research Article  Open Access
Tianbao Cheng, Weiguo Li, Wei Lu, Yushan Shi, "Heat Transfer and Failure Mode Analyses of UltrahighTemperature Ceramic Thermal Protection System of Hypersonic Vehicles", Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2014, Article ID 412718, 11 pages, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/412718
Heat Transfer and Failure Mode Analyses of UltrahighTemperature Ceramic Thermal Protection System of Hypersonic Vehicles
Abstract
The transient temperature distribution of the ultrahightemperature ceramic (UHTC) thermal protection system (TPS) of hypersonic vehicles is calculated using finite volume method. Convective cooling enables a balance of heat increment and loss to be achieved. The temperature in the UHTC plate at the balance is approximately proportional to the surface heat flux and is approximately inversely proportional to the convective heat transfer coefficient. The failure modes of the UHTCs are presented by investigating the thermal stress field of the UHTC TPS under different thermal environments. The UHTCs which act as the thermal protection materials of hypersonic vehicles can fail because of the tensile stress at the lower surface, an area above the middle plane, and the upper surface as well as because of the compressive stress at the upper surface. However, the area between the lower surface and the middle plane and a small area near the upper surface are relatively safe. Neither the compressive stress nor the tensile stress will cause failure of these areas.
1. Introduction
To obtain good aerodynamic characteristics, reentry and hypersonic vehicles require sharp nose cones and sharp leading edges, as well as nonablation thermal protection technique that can maintain the vehicle shapes. These vehicles usually fly in the atmosphere for long periods at speed of high Mach numbers and are often subjected to severe aerodynamic heating. This poses huge challenges for the thermal protection materials and structures of vehicles, such as the capability of withstanding ultrahigh temperature, chemical stability, and resistance to thermal shock, oxidation, and erosioncorrosion.
Ultrahightemperature ceramics (UHTCs) are candidate materials that can meet the above performance requirements and are receiving more and more attention [1]. The sintering mechanisms [2–8] and oxidation behavior [9–15] of UHTCs were widely studied. The mechanical and thermal properties were investigated over a wide range of temperatures [16–26]. The thermal shock resistance (TSR) of UHTCs under different thermal environments was studied and heat transfer conditions and critical heat transfer conditions for the first, second, and third type thermal boundary conditions were introduced [27, 28]. The aerothermodynamic analysis of the UHTC thermal protection system (TPS) was performed using computational fluid dynamics simulations coupled to a thermal analysis model [29]. These studies have deepened the understanding of UHTCs. However, few of them focused on the heat transfer and failure mode analyses of the UHTC TPS.
Thermal management is one of the priority issues of hypersonic vehicles which are often subjected to severe aerodynamic heating because of the violent friction with air. Active cooling TPS has been proposed as alternative TPS to eliminate the aerodynamic heating and maintain the structural temperature within maximum operational temperature limit [30]. In the present work, the heat transfer and failure modes of the UHTC TPS with convective cooling are analyzed. The transient temperature distribution is calculated using finite volume method (FVM). The thermal stress field is presented by combining the model of thermal stress field updated in the previous work [27]. All the material properties are temperaturedependent. The study is useful for the thermal management and design of the UHTC TPS of reentry and hypersonic vehicles.
2. Analysis Methodology
2.1. UHTC TPS of Hypersonic Vehicles
A schematic of the UHTC TPS with convective cooling is shown in Figure 1. The UHTC plate of thickness , with Cartesian coordinates embedded at the lower surface, is initially at a uniform temperature . At time , the upper surface () is imposed with surface heat flux because of aerodynamic heating. Convective cooling is accomplished by circulating coolant through passage in the structure to remove the absorbed heat due to aerodynamic heating. The temperature of the coolant is and the convective heat transfer coefficient is .
The thickness is small in relation to the transverse dimensions (length and width) of the plate. Thus, conduction is assumed to occur exclusively in the direction [27, 28, 31]. The onedimensional transient heat conduction equation can be expressed as where is the thermal conductivity; is the density; and is the specific heat at constant pressure. Equation (1) is subjected to the following initial and boundary conditions:
Since the material properties are temperaturedependent, a closed form solution for (1) cannot be obtained. The perturbation method [32] and laminated plate model [33] were used to deal with the transient heat conduction problem in the functionally graded materials (FGMs). (The Green’s function approach [34] and mode superposition method [35] were used in the FGMs with temperatureindependent material properties.) However, these approaches usually lead to complicated equation systems and solving programs. In addition, the transient temperature distributions of the UHTC plate under different thermal environments were calculated using the solutions of the semiinfinite solid [27, 28] but this method is restricted to the single thermal environments, that is, the first, second, or third type thermal boundary conditions. Next, the FVM is used to analyze the above onedimensional transient heat conduction problem. For convenience of discussion, taking the UHTCs as an example, it can also be applied to the FGMs. As one can see later, the FVM shows its advantage and convenience to deal with this heat conduction problem.
2.2. Transient Temperature Distribution
The computing grid of the FVM for the onedimensional transient heat conduction problem described in the preceding subsection is shown in Figure 2. The space domain is divided into (n–1) elements and control volumes by the nodes. The element is the region between the node and node . The face of the control volume is midway between two nodes so that node is only enclosed by control volume . The length of the element is . Thus, the length of the control volume can be expressed as . Integrating (1) on the control volume and in the time interval , one obtains
Equation (4) can also be expressed as
Following the tradition, the physical quantities on the control volume have the values of node when the transient term is treated. Then the term on the righthand side of (5) becomes where the superscript “0” indicates that the physical quantities take the values at time (the beginning of the time step); the physical quantities at time (the end of the time step) are not denoted by superscript; the subscript “” indicates that the physical quantities take the values of node . Note that (ρC_{p}) has been assumed to take the value at the beginning of the time step.
The diffusion term at the faces of the control volume can be expressed by the central differencing scheme using the values of the nodes. Then (5) becomes wherewhere and are the thermal conductivities at the faces and , respectively; , , and are the thermal conductivities at the nodes , , and , respectively; , , and are the temperatures at the nodes , , and , respectively.
How temperature changes over time should be given to calculate the timeintegral terms in (7). Taking the time integration of as an example, without loss of generality, the corresponding timeintegral term can be expressed as where is the weighting factor between 0 and 1. Its different values correspond to different schemes. In particular, the schemes of f = 0, 0.5, and 1 are the explicit time integration scheme, CrankNicolson time integration scheme, and fully implicit time integration scheme, respectively. The time integrations of and can also be expressed using equations that are of (9) form. Thus, (7) can be expressed as
Note that and have been assumed to take the values at the beginning of the time step. According to (8a) and (8b),where , , and are the thermal conductivities of nodes , , and at the beginning of the time step, respectively. Introducing symbols , , , and , (10) can also be expressed as where
The differential quotients in the thermal boundary conditions at the lower and upper surfaces can be replaced by the ahead difference quotient and the back difference quotient, respectively. Thus, (3a) and (3b) become
Furthermore, in (14a) and in (14b) can be replaced by and , respectively, to ensure that the coefficient matrix of the system of linear algebraic equations that will be integrated later is a symmetric matrix. Thus, (14a) and (14b) become
The fully implicit time integration scheme is unconditionally stable. That is, whatever the time increment is, oscillations of solutions will not appear. Taking f = 1 in (12), the discrete equation of the fully implicit time integration scheme for the onedimensional transient heat transfer conduction problem is obtained: where and , , and see (13a)–(13c). Then the corresponding system of linear algebraic equations can be integrated using (15a), (15b), and equations that are of (16) form and can be expressed as where
The coefficient matrix of (18) is a symmetric sparse matrix with bandwidth 2. Various methods can be adopted to solve this system of equations, such as the tridiagonal matrix algorithm developed by Tomas. In this work, for simplicity, the GaussSeidel iterative method is used, with the following iterative formula:
The difference between the temperatures of node that are calculated at the last two iterations, , should be small enough to obtain solution with high precision. In this work, and are used due to thermal shock occurring at the lower and upper surfaces. The grids near the surfaces are refined, as shown in Figure 3, where and are the proportion of the subregion and the total region and the number of elements, respectively. In this work, , , , , , and . Besides, time increment s is used.
2.3. Thermal Stress Field
The transient temperature distribution obtained in the preceding subsection is a piecewise linear function of the node coordinate. The temperature in element can be expressed as where is the coordinate of node . The expressions , , , , and in element can be calculated using numerical integration methods, where is Young’s modulus; is Poisson’s ratio; and is the thermal strain due to free thermal expansion. Note that , , and are functions of temperature. In particular, is also dependent on the thermal shock initial temperature and can be generated according to the following formula: where is the coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) from the reference temperature and is also function of temperature. Further, the following expressions can be calculated:The parameters and can be determined:Then the thermal stress field of the UHTC plate can be expressed as [27] where and are the normal stress in the and directions, respectively. In particular, the normal stress at node can be expressed as where and are Young’s modulus and Poisson’s ratio at node , respectively; is the thermal strain due to free thermal expansion at node and can be expressed as
Hereto, the FVM for calculations of the transient temperature distribution and thermal stress filed of the UHTC TPS with convective cooling has been presented. One can see that it is very convenient to apply. The main work is to solve the system of linear algebraic equations whose coefficient matrix is a symmetric sparse matrix with bandwidth 2.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. TemperatureDependent Material Properties
Taking the zirconium diboride (ZrB_{2}) ceramics as an example, the transient temperature distribution and the thermal stress field of the UHTC TPS of hypersonic vehicles are studied. The corresponding material properties are shown in Table 1 [1, 18, 36], where temperaturedependent Young’s modulus can be expressed as [37] where is Young’s modulus at room temperature; is the melting point; and , , and are material constants. For the ZrB_{2} ceramics, = 489 GPa [1], = 3245°C [1], = 2.54, = 1.9, and = 0.363.

3.2. Transient Temperature Distribution
In the following discussion, the temperature is limited to 2000°C because of the lack of experimental data and the significant plastic deformation.
Illustrative Example 1. The transient temperature distribution of the UHTC plate under aerodynamic thermal environments is calculated, in which mm, °C, MW m^{−2}, and (and = 20°C). The results are shown in Figure 4. It can be seen that the temperature gradient in the plate increases with the thickness coordinate. Theoretically, the temperature gradient at the lower surface is equal to zero and that at the upper surface which can be determined from (3b) increases gradually as time increases. This is because the thermal conductivity decreases with increasing temperature. Thus, according to Fourier’s law, the temperature gradient increases due to the fact that the surface heat flux is constant in the example. The temperature gradient in the plate approximately is distributed linearly after the temperature of the insulated lower surface changes (after 2 s in Figure 4). That is, the temperature in the plate is approximately quadratic along the thickness.
Illustrative Example 2. In illustrative example 1, change and to 0 and 2 KW m^{−2}, respectively, and keep the other parameters unchanged; the corresponding transient temperature distribution is calculated. The results in Figure 5 show that the temperature gradient in the plate decreases with the thickness coordinate. In theory, the temperature gradient at the upper surface is equal to zero and that at the lower surface which can be determined from (3a) decreases gradually and tends to zero as time increases. This is because the temperature difference between the lower surface and the coolant decreases as time increases. Thus, according to Newton’s law of cooling, the convective heat flux decreases due to the fact that the convective heat transfer coefficient is constant in the example. Besides, the increased thermal conductivity because of the decreasing temperature also decreases the temperature gradient. The temperature gradient in the plate approximately is distributed linearly after the temperature of the insulated upper surface changes (after 2 s in Figure 5).
Illustrative Example 3. In illustrative example 1, change to 2 KW m^{−2} and keep the other parameters unchanged; the corresponding transient temperature distribution is calculated. The results in Figure 6 show that the temperature gradient in the plate initially increases sharply and then remains approximately constant as time increases. (In fact, the temperature gradient in the plate gradually increases with the thickness coordinate because of the temperaturedependent thermal conductivity.) That is, the temperature in the plate is approximately linear along the thickness. The temperature gradient at the upper surface in this figure should be equal to that in Figure 4 according to Fourier’s law if the two upper surface temperatures are the same. That is, the temperature gradient in this figure is greater than that in Figure 4, but the change of the temperature gradient along the thickness is reduced. In addition, the lower surface temperature differs from the upper surface temperature in that it firstly decreases sharply, then increases gradually, and lastly tends to a balance temperature which is determined by the following equation: according to Newton’s law of cooling. In this example, = 1020°C. Note that the assumption that heat flowing into the plate from the upper surface is equal to that flowing out the plate from the lower surface at the balance is used. (The balance refers to the time that the temperature in the plate remains unchanged as time increases.) If the lower surface temperature, at the time when the temperature gradient in the plate becomes constant, is higher than the balance temperature , the lower surface temperature will decrease to approach this balance temperature (see illustrative example 4). The temperature distribution at the balance can be expressed as where is the thermal conductivity at the lower surface; that is, ). Thus, the upper surface temperature at the balance can be calculated as follows: It can be seen that is an approximately linear function of . In fact, calculated from (31) is a little lower than its true value. This is because the gradient at the lower surface used in (30) is the lowest in the plate. A little higher can be calculated from the following equation by numerical iterative computation: where is the thermal conductivity at the upper surface; that is, . Then the temperature distribution at the balance can be obtained:
Illustrative Example 4. In illustrative example 3, change to 3 KW m^{−2} and keep the other parameters unchanged; the corresponding transient temperature distribution is calculated and shown in Figure 7. Similar analysis can be carried out as that in illustrative example 3.
The upper surface temperature at the balance has been calculated as functions of surface heat flux and convective heat transfer coefficient and shown in Figure 8, in which mm, °C, and °C.
(a)
(b)
Based on the discussion above, it can be seen that convective cooling increases the temperature gradient in the plate but decreases the change of the temperature gradient along the thickness. Convective cooling also enables a balance of heat increment and loss to be achieved. The temperature in the UHTC plate at the balance is approximately proportional to the surface heat flux and is approximately inversely proportional to the convective heat transfer coefficient. (See (30) and (33) and Figure 8.)
3.3. Thermal Stress Field
The thermal stress field of the UHTC plate that corresponds to illustrative examples 1–4 in the preceding subsection is calculated and shown in Figures 9–12.
Illustrative Example 1. The results in Figure 9 show that the upper surface, middle plane, and lower surface successively reach their maximum stresses as time increases. Thereafter, the thermal stress in the plate decreases with increased time. This is because the temperature gradient in the plate remains approximately unchanged (in fact, it increases very gradually because of the temperaturedependent material properties) as time increases but Young’s modulus decreases and the thermal strain due to free thermal expansion increases significantly, respectively, as temperature increases. The thermal stress in the plate is approximately symmetric with respect to the middle plane because of the parabolic temperature distribution with increasing time. The upper and lower surfaces are located by compressive stress and the middle plane is located by tensile stress. The maximum compressive stress at different time firstly appears at the upper surface and then at the lower surface. The location of the maximum tensile stress at different time moves from the place near the upper surface to that near the middle plane. Both the maximum compressive stress and the maximum tensile stress initially increase sharply and then decrease gradually as time increases. The maximum compressive stress is greater than the maximum tensile stress. It can be seen that the failure of the plate because of compressive stress usually occurs at the upper surface because the strength decreases with temperature. The failure can also be caused by tensile stress in an area between the middle plane and the upper surface because the tensile strength is usually less than the compressive strength for ceramics.
Illustrative Example 2. From Figure 10, it can be seen that the upper and lower surfaces are located by tensile stress and the middle plane is located by compressive stress. The maximum tensile stress is greater than the maximum compressive stress. The thermal stress in the plate will tend to zero with temperature and temperature gradient in the plate approaching the coolant temperature and zero, respectively, as time increases. In this case, the failure of the plate can be caused by tensile stress at the lower surface and that at the upper surface in theory because of the temperaturedependent strength. (Note that the location of the maximum compressive stress at different time moves from place near the lower surface to that near the middle plane but the compressive stress will not cause the plate’s failure because the compressive strength is greater than the tensile strength for ceramics.) Other conclusions can be analyzed as that in illustrative example 1.
Illustrative Example 3. The results in Figure 11 show that the upper surface is located by compressive stress which initially increases sharply and then decreases gradually as time increases. The lower surface firstly is located by tensile stress and then by compressive stress which initially increase and then decrease with increased time. There is a peak and a valley until the temperature gradient in the plate becomes constant. Thereafter, the thermal stress in the plate decreases gradually as time increases. (The mechanical properties are temperaturedependent; thus, the thermal stress in the plate is not equal to zero though the temperature gradient is constant.) The thermal stress field is expected to be kept on hold at the balance. It can be seen that the maximum compressive stress at different time usually occurs at the upper surface but can also occur at the lower surface after the temperature gradient in the plate becomes constant because the mechanical properties increase with decreasing temperature. The maximum tensile stress at different time firstly occurs at the lower surface and then in an area between the middle plane and the upper surface. Thus, the failure of the plate can be caused by tensile stress at the lower surface and in an area between the middle plane and the upper surface in theory and by compressive stress at the upper surface.
Illustrative Example 4. The results in Figure 12 can be similarly analyzed as that in Figure 11. It is worth noting that the thermal stress in the plate is intensified gradually after the temperature gradient becomes constant because the mechanical properties increase with decreasing temperature. Thus, the compressive stress located at the upper surface initially increases, then decreases, and lastly increases again. The lower surface firstly is located by tensile stress which initially increases and then decreases and then by increasing compressive stress.
Based on the discussion above, it can be seen that the UHTCs which act as the thermal protection materials of hypersonic vehicles can fail because of the tensile stress at the lower surface, in an area above the middle plane, and at the upper surface and because of the compressive stress at the upper surface, as shown in Figure 13. Note that the conclusion is drawn based on the following: the strength decreases with increasing temperature; the compressive strength is greater than the tensile strength. It can be seen that the area between the lower surface and the middle plane and a small area near the upper surface are relatively safe. Neither the compressive stress nor the tensile stress will cause these areas’ failure.
In addition, it can be seen that the plate in Figure 9 (and Figure 10) whose upper and lower surfaces are located by compressive stress (and tensile tress) has a peak (and a valley). However, there is a peak and a valley in Figures 11 and 12 when the upper and lower surfaces are, respectively, located by compressive stress and tensile stress. This is the result of meeting the free boundary condition that the resultants and resultant couples of the transverse normal stresses of the four lateral sides of the plate are equal to zero.
The thermal stress near the upper surface, middle plane, and lower surface in Figure 11 is reduced compared to that in Figures 9 and 10. This may be due to the fact that the change of the temperature gradient along the thickness is reduced. For example, it is well known that the quadratic and linear temperature distributions would lead to the fact that the thermal stress in the plate is approximately quadratic and equal to zero, respectively, if the mechanical properties are constant [38, 39]. This can also be analyzed qualitatively. The thermal stress near the upper surface, middle plane, and lower surface in Figures 9 and 10 in which the plate is heated at the upper surface and cooled at the lower surface, respectively, is the opposite. Thus, the thermal stress at these areas is reduced when the plate is heated at the upper surface and cooled at the lower surface. This implies that convective cooling can improve the TSR of the UHTC plate. On the other hand, if both the upper and lower surfaces are heated or cooled, the thermal stress in the plate will be intensified. In this case, the TSR of the plate is worse.
4. Conclusions
The transient temperature distribution of the UHTC TPS with convective cooling was calculated using FVM and then the thermal stress field was obtained by combining the model of thermal stress field from literature [27]. All the material properties are functions of temperature. The anisotropy of strength in tension and compression was considered in the analysis of failure modes. Note that the surface heat flux and the convective heat transfer coefficient can be different at each time increment. Thus, the method can also treat cases in which both the surface heat flux and the convective heat transfer coefficient vary with time. Comprehensive discussions on the heat transfer and failure modes of the UHTC TPS of hypersonic vehicles were carried out. The following conclusions were drawn.(1)Convective cooling increases the temperature gradient in the plate but decreases the change of the temperature gradient along the thickness.(2)Convective cooling enables a balance of heat increment and loss to be achieved. The temperature in the UHTC plate at the balance is approximately proportional to the surface heat flux and is approximately inversely proportional to the convective heat transfer coefficient.(3)The UHTCs which act as the thermal protection materials of hypersonic vehicles can fail because of the tensile stress at the lower surface, in an area above the middle plane, and at the upper surface as well as because of the compressive stress at the upper surface. The area between the lower surface and the middle plane and a small area near the upper surface are relatively safe. Neither the compressive stress nor the tensile stress will cause failure of these areas.(4)The thermal stress near the upper surface, middle plane, and lower surface in the UHTC plate under aerodynamic thermal environments can be reduced remarkably when the convective cooling is operated. That is, convective cooling can improve the TSR of the UHTC plate.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 11172336), the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University (no. ncet130634), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (nos. CDJZR13240021 and CDJZR14328801), the Chongqing Natural Science Foundation (no. cstc2013jcyjA50018), and the Joint Fund of the National Natural Science Foundation of China and the China Academy of Engineering Physics (no. 11176035).
References
 W. G. Fahrenholtz, G. E. Hilmas, I. G. Talmy, and J. A. Zaykoski, “Refractory diborides of zirconium and hafnium,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 90, no. 5, pp. 1347–1364, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 F. Monteverde and A. Bellosi, “Effect of the addition of silicon nitride on sintering behaviour and microstructure of zirconium diboride,” Scripta Materialia, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 223–228, 2002. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 W. W. Wu, G. J. Zhang, Y. M. Kan, and P. L. Wang, “Reactive hot pressing of ZrB_{2}SiCZrC ultra hightemperature ceramics at 1800°C,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 89, no. 9, pp. 2967–2969, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 L. Silvestroni, D. Sciti, J. Kling, S. Lauterbach, and H. J. Kleebe, “Sintering mechanisms of zirconium and hafnium carbides doped with MoSi_{2},” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 92, no. 7, pp. 1574–1579, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. K. Sonber and A. K. Suri, “Synthesis and consolidation of zirconium diboride: review,” Advances in Applied Ceramics, vol. 110, no. 6, pp. 321–334, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 V. Zamora, A. L. Ortiz, F. Guiberteau, and M. Nygren, “In situ formation of ZrB_{2}ZrO_{2} ultrahightemperature ceramic composites from highenergy ballmilled ZrB_{2} powders,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 518, pp. 38–43, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. Orrù and G. Cao, “Comparison of reactive and nonreactive spark plasma sintering routes for the fabrication of monolithic and composite Ultra High Temperature Ceramics (UHTC) materials,” Materials, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 1566–1583, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 G. B. Yadhukulakrishnan, S. Karumuri, A. Rahman, R. P. Singh, A. Kaan Kalkan, and S. P. Harimkar, “Spark plasma sintering of graphene reinforced zirconium diboride ultrahigh temperature ceramic composites,” Ceramics International, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 6637–6646, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. R. Levine, E. J. Opila, M. C. Halbig, J. D. Kiser, M. Singh, and J. A. Salem, “Evaluation of ultrahigh temperature ceramics for aeropropulsion use,” Journal of the European Ceramic Society, vol. 22, no. 1415, pp. 2757–2767, 2002. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Gasch, D. Ellerby, E. Irby, S. Beckman, M. Gusman, and S. Johnson, “Processing, properties and arc jet oxidation of hafnium diboride/silicon carbide ultra high temperature ceramics,” Journal of Materials Science, vol. 39, no. 19, pp. 5925–5937, 2004. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Rezaie, W. G. Fahrenholtz, and G. E. Hilmas, “Evolution of structure during the oxidation of zirconium diboridesilicon carbide in air up to 1500°C,” Journal of the European Ceramic Society, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 2495–2501, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. N. Karlsdottir and J. W. Halloran, “Rapid oxidation characterization of ultrahigh temperature ceramics,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 90, no. 10, pp. 3233–3238, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Han, P. Hu, X. Zhang, and S. Meng, “Oxidation behavior of zirconium diboridesilicon carbide at 1800°C,” Scripta Materialia, vol. 57, no. 9, pp. 825–828, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 W. G. Fahrenholtz and G. E. Hilmas, “Oxidation of ultrahigh temperature transition metal diboride ceramics,” International Materials Reviews, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 61–72, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 L. Charpentier, M. BalatPichelin, D. Sciti, and L. Silvestroni, “High temperature oxidation of Zr and Hfcarbides: influence of matrix and sintering additive,” Journal of the European Ceramic Society, vol. 33, no. 1516, pp. 2867–2878, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. M. Opeka, I. G. Talmy, E. J. Wuchina, J. A. Zaykoski, and S. J. Causey, “Mechanical, thermal, and oxidation properties of refractory hafnium and zirconium compounds,” Journal of the European Ceramic Society, vol. 19, no. 1314, pp. 2405–2414, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
 E. Wuchina, M. Opeka, S. Causey et al., “Designing for ultrahightemperature applications: the mechanical and thermal properties of HfB_{2}, HfC_{x}, HfN_{x} and αHf(N),” Journal of Materials Science, vol. 39, no. 19, pp. 5939–5949, 2004. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. Loehman, E. Corral, H. P. Dumm, P. Kotula, and R. Tandon, “Ultra high temperature ceramics for hypersonic vehicle applications,” SAND 2006–2925, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, USA, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
 M. Gasch, S. Johnson, and J. Marschall, “Thermal conductivity characterization of hafnium diboridebased ultrahightemperature ceramics,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 91, no. 5, pp. 1423–1432, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. RamírezRico, M. A. Bautista, J. MartínezFernández, and M. Singh, “Compressive strength degradation in ZrB_{2}based ultrahigh temperature ceramic composites,” Journal of the European Ceramic Society, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 1345–1352, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Zou, G. J. Zhang, C. F. Hu et al., “Hightemperature bending strength, internal friction and stiffness of ZrB_{2}20vol% SiC ceramics,” Journal of the European Ceramic Society, vol. 32, no. 10, pp. 2519–2527, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Zou, G. J. Zhang, C. F. Hu et al., “Strong ZrB_{2}—SiC—WC ceramics at 1600°C,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 874–878, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. W. Bird, R. P. Aune, A. F. Thomas, P. F. Becher, and K. W. White, “Temperaturedependent mechanical and long crack behavior of zirconium diboridesilicon carbide composite,” Journal of the European Ceramic Society, vol. 32, no. 12, pp. 3453–3462, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 E. W. Neuman, G. E. Hilmas, and W. G. Fahrenholtz, “Strength of zirconium diboride to 2300°C,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 96, no. 1, pp. 47–50, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. B. Zhang, X. M. Cheng, D. N. Fang, L. L. Ke, and Y. S. Wang, “Ultrahightemperature tensile properties and fracture behavior of ZrB_{2}based ceramics in air above 1500°C,” Materials and Design, vol. 52, pp. 17–22, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. B. Zhang, R. J. He, X. H. Zhang, and D. N. Fang, “Microstructure and mechanical properties of ZrB_{2}SiC composites prepared by gelcasting and pressureless sintering,” International Journal of Refractory Metals and Hard Materials, vol. 43, pp. 83–88, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
 T. B. Cheng, W. G. Li, and D. N. Fang, “Thermal shock resistance of ultrahightemperature ceramics under aerodynamic thermal environments,” AIAA Journal, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 840–848, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 T. B. Cheng, W. G. Li, C. Z. Zhang, and D. N. Fang, “Unified thermal shock resistance of ultrahigh temperature ceramics under different thermal environments,” Journal of Thermal Stresses, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 14–33, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
 R. Savino, M. de Stefano Fumo, D. Paterna, and M. Serpico, “Aerothermodynamic study of UHTCbased thermal protection systems,” Aerospace Science and Technology, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 151–160, 2005. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. L. Blosser, Advanced metallic thermal protection systems for reusable launch vehicles [Ph.D. thesis], School of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Va, USA, 2000.
 T. L. Bergman, A. S. Lavine, F. P. Incropera, and D. P. DeWitt, Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2011.
 N. Noda, “Thermal stresses in materials with temperaturedependent properties,” in Thermal Stresses I, R. B. Hetnarski, Ed., pp. 391–438, Elsevier Science, NorthHolland, The Netherlands, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
 Y. Tanigawa, T. Akai, R. Kawamura, and N. Oka, “Transient heat conduction and thermal stress problems of a nonhomogeneous plate with temperaturedependent material properties,” Journal of Thermal Stresses, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 77–102, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
 K. S. Kim and N. Noda, “Green's function approach to solution of transient temperature for thermal stresses of functionally graded material,” JSME International Journal A, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 31–36, 2001. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 B. L. Wang, Y. W. Mai, and X. H. Zhang, “Functionally graded materials under severe thermal environments,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 683–690, 2005. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. Q. Guo, Y. Kagawa, and T. Nishimura, “Mechanical behavior of twostep hotpressed ZrB_{2}based composites with ZrSi_{2},” Journal of the European Ceramic Society, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 787–794, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 W. G. Li, R. Z. Wang, D. Y. Li, and D. N. Fang, “A model of temperaturedependent Young's modulus for ultrahigh temperature ceramics,” Physics Research International, vol. 2011, Article ID 791545, 3 pages, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. Timoshenko and J. N. Goodier, Theory of Elasticity, McGrawHill, New York, NY, USA, 1951. View at: MathSciNet
 W. D. Kingery, “Factors affecting thermal stress resistance of ceramic materials,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 3–15, 1955. View at: Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 Tianbao Cheng et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.