Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 414362, 11 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/414362
Research Article

Sensitivity Analysis for Iceberg Geometry Shape in Ship-Iceberg Collision in View of Different Material Models

1State Key Laboratory of Ocean Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
2COTEC Offshore Engineering Solution, Houston, TX 77079, USA

Received 25 June 2014; Accepted 22 July 2014; Published 25 September 2014

Academic Editor: Song Cen

Copyright © 2014 Yan Gao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. S. Hänninen, Incidents and Accidents in Winter Navigation in the Baltic Sea, Winter 2002-2003, Finnish Maritime Administration, 2005.
  2. F. M. Administrations, Finnish-Swedish Ice Class Rules, 2008.
  3. A. Gürtner, Experimental and numerical investigations of ice-structure interaction [Ph.D. thesis], Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 2009.
  4. G. W. Timco and W. F. Weeks, “A review of the engineering properties of sea ice,” Cold Regions Science and Technology, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 107–129, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. E. M. Schulson, “Brittle failure of ice,” Engineering Fracture Mechanics, vol. 68, no. 17-18, pp. 1839–1887, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. Storheim, E. Kim, J. Amdahl, and S. Ehlers, “Iceberg shape sensitivity in ship impact assessment in view of existing material models,” in Proceedings of the ASME 31st International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, 2012.
  7. N. Norsok, 004, Design of Steel Structures, Standards Norway, Rev 2 , 2004.
  8. T. J. Sanderson, Ice Mechanics-Risks to Offshore Structures, Graham and Trotman, London, UK, 1988.
  9. D. M. Masterson, R. Frederking, B. Wright, T. Kärnä, and W. P. Maddock, “A revised ice pressure-area curve,” in Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering under Arctic Conditions, 2007.
  10. ISO/CD 19906, Petroleum and Natural Gas Industries-Arctic Offshore Structures, ISO TC 67/SC 7/WG8. Final Draft International Standard, International Standardisation Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2010.
  11. A. C. Palmer, J. P. Dempsey, and D. M. Masterson, “A revised ice pressure-area curve and a fracture mechanics explanation,” Cold Regions Science and Technology, vol. 56, no. 2-3, pp. 73–76, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. G. W. Timco and D. Sudom, “Revisiting the Sanderson pressure—area curve: defining parameters that influence ice pressure,” Cold Regions Science and Technology, vol. 95, pp. 53–66, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  13. R. E. Gagnon, “A numerical model of ice crushing using a foam analogue,” Cold Regions Science and Technology, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 335–350, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. C. Jebaraj, A. S. J. Swamidas, L. Y. Shih, and K. Munaswamy, “Finite element analysis of ship/ice interaction,” Computers and Structures, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 205–221, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  15. R. von Bock, U. Polach, and S. Ehlers, “Model scale ice—part B: numerical model,” Cold Regions Science and Technology, vol. 94, pp. 53–60, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  16. R. Gagnon, “Analysis of data from bergy bit impacts using a novel hull-mounted external impact panel,” Cold Regions Science and Technology, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 50–66, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. A. Derradji-Aouat, “A unified failure envelope for isotropic fresh water ice and iceberg ice,” in Proceedings of ETCE/OMAE Joint Conference Energy for the New Millenium, 2000.
  18. J. C. Simo and T. J. R. Hughes, Computational Inelasticity, vol. 7 of Interdisciplinary Applied Mathematics, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2008. View at MathSciNet
  19. Z. Liu, J. Amdahl, and S. Løset, “Plasticity based material modelling of ice and its application to ship-iceberg impacts,” Cold Regions Science and Technology, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 326–334, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. R. E. Gagnon and P. H. Gammon, “Triaxial experiments on iceberg and glacier ice,” Journal of Glaciology, vol. 41, no. 139, pp. 528–540, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. J. O. Hallquist, LS-DYNA: Keyword User's Manual, Livermore Software Technology, Livermore, Calif, USA, 2007.
  22. Z. Liu, J. Amdahl, and S. Løset, “Integrated numerical analysis of an iceberg collision with a foreship structure,” Marine Structures, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 377–395, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. I. J. Jordaan, “Mechanics of ice-structure interaction,” Engineering Fracture Mechanics, vol. 68, no. 17-18, pp. 1923–1960, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. E. Kim, M. Storheim, R. V. B. Und Polach, and J. Amdahl, “Design and modelling of accidental ship collisions with ice masses at laboratory-scale,” in Proceedings of the ASME 31st International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2012.