Evaluating the Performance of Polynomial Regression Method with Different Parameters during Color Characterization

<table>Comparison of the <svg height="11.75" id="M155" style="vertical-align:-0.15048pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 33.862499 11.75" width="33.862499" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,.062,11.4)"><path d="M627 18l-10 -26q-79 6 -116 27t-69 76q-41 71 -71 138q-13 29 -27.5 39t-42.5 10h-46l-27 -145q-13 -74 -2.5 -88.5t78.5 -20.5l-6 -28h-271l5 28q66 6 82.5 21.5t30.5 87.5l71 387q12 66 2 78.5t-77 19.5l8 28h233q102 0 147 -29q65 -43 65 -129q0 -69 -45.5 -117
t-115.5 -72q40 -86 66 -133q39 -68 65 -101q28 -37 73 -51zM491 483q0 67 -33.5 101t-91.5 34q-35 0 -51 -10q-13 -8 -20 -48l-45 -245h49q71 0 113 28q79 52 79 140z" id="x1D445"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,11.01,11.4)"><path d="M713 296l-5 -25q-47 -7 -59 -20t-23 -72l-15 -79q-9 -48 -3 -74q-15 -3 -55 -13t-63 -15t-59.5 -10t-70.5 -5q-149 0 -243 80t-94 220q0 169 127.5 276.5t336.5 107.5q91 0 206 -36l-10 -165l-29 -1q1 85 -47.5 126t-146.5 41q-153 0 -243.5 -97t-90.5 -242
q0 -122 68.5 -198.5t188.5 -76.5q121 0 139 75l20 86q13 58 -1.5 70.5t-99.5 20.5l5 26h267z" id="x1D43A"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,23.317,11.4)"><path d="M594 511q0 -122 -171 -157l1 -2q158 -33 158 -159q0 -52 -34.5 -95t-90.5 -65q-76 -33 -217 -33h-223l8 28q63 5 79.5 19t26.5 72l83 426q9 48 -2.5 60t-77.5 17l6 28h259q195 0 195 -139zM499 509q0 59 -37 83t-91 24q-36 0 -51 -9q-17 -9 -22 -44l-35 -195h62
q82 0 128 37t46 104zM481 199q0 71 -48 102.5t-121 31.5h-56l-37 -201q-11 -58 7.5 -77t80.5 -19q76 0 125 44.5t49 118.5z" id="x1D435"></path></g>
</svg> monitor’s color errors between CIEXYZ and CIELAB spaces.</table>

Mathematical Problems in Engineering

fig2

Figure 2

Figure 2: Evaluating the Performance of Polynomial Regression Method with Different Parameters during Color Characterization 