Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2014, Article ID 427203, 12 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/427203
Research Article

Effective Parameter Dimension via Bayesian Model Selection in the Inverse Acoustic Scattering Problem

CIMAT A.C, Jalisco S/N, Valenciana, 36240 México, GTO, Mexico

Received 8 April 2014; Revised 23 July 2014; Accepted 23 July 2014; Published 7 September 2014

Academic Editor: Fatih Yaman

Copyright © 2014 Abel Palafox et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. T. Oden, R. Moser, and O. Ghattas, “Computer predictions with quantified uncertainty, part I,” SIAM News, vol. 43, no. 9, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  2. T. Oden, R. Moser, and O. Ghattas, “Computer predictions with quantified uncertainty, part II,” SIAM News, vol. 43, no. 10, pp. 1–4, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  3. C. Fox, H. Haario, and J. Christen, Bayesian Theory and Applications, Inverse Problems, 2013.
  4. S. Geman and D. Geman, “Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions and the Bayesian restoration of images,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 721–741, 1984. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. Kaipio and E. Somersalo, Statistical and Computational Inverse Problems, vol. 160 of Applied Mathematical Sciences, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2005. View at MathSciNet
  6. A. Tarantola, Inverse Problem Theory and Methods for Model Parameter Estimation, SIAM, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 2005.
  7. L. Biegler, G. Biros, O. Ghattas et al., Eds., Large-Scale Inverse Problems and Quantification of Uncertainty, Wiley Series in Computational Statistics, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 2011.
  8. V. Kolehmainen, M. Lassas, K. Niinimäki, and S. Siltanen, “Sparsity-promoting Bayesian inversion,” Inverse Problems, vol. 28, no. 2, Article ID 025005, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  9. U. Grenander and M. I. Miller, “Representations of knowledge in complex systems,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 549–603, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  10. C. A. Zarzer, “On Tikhonov regularization with non-convex sparsity constraints,” Inverse Problems, vol. 25, no. 2, Article ID 025006, 13 pages, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  11. D. L. Colton and R. Kress, Integral Equation Methods in Scattering Theory, vol. 57, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1983. View at MathSciNet
  12. D. Colton and R. Kress, Inverse Acoustic and Electromagnetic Scattering Theory, vol. 93 of Applied Mathematical Sciences, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2nd edition, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  13. G. Dalquist and A. Bjorck, Numerical Methods in Scientific Computing, vol. 102, SIAM, 2008.
  14. M. Chen, Q. Shao, and J. G. Ibrahim, Monte Carlo methods in Bayesian Computation, Springer Series in Statistics, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  15. M. A. Pinsky, Introduction to Fourier Analysis and Wavelets, vol. 102 of Graduate Studies in Mathematics, American Mathematical Society, 2002. View at MathSciNet
  16. P. de Valpine, “Improved estimation of normalizing constants from Markov chain MONte Carlo output,” Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 333–351, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  17. B. Silverman, Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis, Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability no. 26, Chapman & Hall, New York, NY, USA, 1986.