Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2014, Article ID 438104, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/438104
Research Article

A Pareto Optimal Auction Mechanism for Carbon Emission Rights

1School of International Trade and Economics, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029, China
2School of Economics, Capital University of Economics and Business, Beijing 100070, China
3Department of Manufacturing Engineering & Engineering Management, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong
4Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China

Received 23 December 2013; Accepted 24 February 2014; Published 30 March 2014

Academic Editor: Chuangxia Huang

Copyright © 2014 Mingxi Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. H. Coase, “The problem of the social cost,” Journal of Law and Economics, vol. 3, pp. 1–44, 1960. View at Google Scholar
  2. T. D. Crocker, “The structuring of atmospheric pollution control systems,” in The Economics of Air Pollution, H. Wolozin, Ed., pp. 61–86, W.W. Norton, New York, NY, USA, 1966. View at Google Scholar
  3. J. H. Dales, Pollution Property and Prices, Toronto University Press, Toronto, Canada, 1968.
  4. W. L. Baunol and W. E. Oates, The Theory of Environmental Policy: Externalities, Public Outlays and the Quality of Life, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1988.
  5. P. Linares and C. Romero, “A multiple criteria decision making approach for electricity planning in Spain: economic versus environmental objectives,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 736–743, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. E. Georgopoulou, Y. Sarafidis, S. Mirasgedis, S. Zaimi, and D. P. Lalas, “A multiple criteria decision-aid approach in defining national priorities for greenhouse gases emissions reduction in the energy sector,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 146, no. 1, pp. 199–215, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. W. D. Nordhaus, “Geography and macroeconomics: new data and new findings,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 103, no. 10, pp. 3510–3517, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. F. Jotzo and J. C. V. Pezzey, “Optimal intensity targets for greenhouse gas emissions trading under uncertainty,” Environmental and Resource Economics, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 259–284, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. R. S. Tol, “The economic effects of climate change,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 29–51, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  10. Y. Zhang, “Supply-side structural effect on carbon emissions in China,” Energy Economics, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 186–193, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J.-M. Burniaux and J. Oliveira Martins, “Carbon leakages: a general equilibrium view,” Economic Theory, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 473–495, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  12. K. Capoor and P. Ambrosi, State and Trends of the Carbon Market 2009, The World Bank Report, Washington, DC, USA, 2009.
  13. V. Krishna, Auction Theory, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 2002.
  14. P. Milgrom, “Putting auction theory to work: the simultaneous ascending auction,” Journal of Political Economy, vol. 108, no. 2, pp. 245–272, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. L. M. Ausubel, “An efficient dynamic auction for heterogeneous commodities,” The American Economic Review, vol. 96, no. 3, pp. 602–629, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. D. Mishra and R. Garg, “Descending price multi-item auctions,” Journal of Mathematical Economics, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 161–179, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  17. D. Mishra and D. Veeramani, “Vickrey-Dutch procurement auction for multiple items,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 180, no. 2, pp. 617–629, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  18. A. Avenali, “Exploring the VCG mechanism in combinatorial auctions: the threshold revenue and the threshold-price rule,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 199, no. 1, pp. 262–275, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  19. J. H. Choi, Y. S. Chang, and I. Han, “The empirical analysis of the N-bilateral optimized combinatorial auction model,” Omega, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 482–493, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. N. Sun and Z. Yang, “A double-track adjustment process for discrete markets with substitutes and complements,” Econometrica, vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 933–952, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  21. A. Goel, M. Mahdian, H. Nazerzadeh, and A. Saberi, “Advertisement allocation for generalized second-pricing schemes,” Operations Research Letters, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 571–576, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  22. D.-H. Shih, D. C. Yen, C.-H. Cheng, and M.-H. Shih, “A secure multi-item e-auction mechanism with bid privacy,” Computers and Security, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 273–287, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. Q. Liu, “Equilibrium of a sequence of auctions when bidders demand multiple items,” Economics Letters, vol. 112, no. 2, pp. 192–194, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  24. E. Benz and S. Truck, “CO2 emission allowances trading in Europe—specifying a new class of assets,” Problems and Perspectives in Management, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 30–40, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  25. E. Benz, A. Löschel, and B. Sturm, “Auctioning of CO2 emission allowances in phase 3 of the EU emissions trading scheme,” Climate Policy, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 705–718, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. P. Cramton and S. Kerr, “Tradeable carbon permit auctions how and why to auction not grandfather,” Energy Policy, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 333–345, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. M. Grubb, C. Azar, and U. M. Persson, “Allowance allocation in the European emissions trading system: a commentary,” Climate Policy, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 127–136, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. S. Clò, “Grandfathering, auctioning and carbon leakage: assessing the inconsistencies of the new ETS directive,” Energy Policy, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 2420–2430, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. J. Kruger and W. A. Pizer, “The EU emissions trading directive opportunities and potential pitfalls, resources for the future,” Working Paper 04-24, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  30. D. Burtraw, J. Goeree, C. A. Holt, E. Myers, K. Palmer, and W. Shobe, “Collusion in auctions for emission permits: an experimental analysis,” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 672–691, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. C. Holt, W. Shobe, D. Burtraw et al., “Auction design for selling CO2 emission allowances under the regional greenhouse gas initiative,” Final Report, New York State Energy Research and Development Authority, Albany, NY, USA, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  32. F. Gul and E. Stacchetti, “Walrasian equilibrium with gross substitutes,” Journal of Economic Theory, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 95–124, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  33. A. Mas-Colell, D. W. Michael, and R. G. Jerry, Microeconomic Theory, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 1995.
  34. C. Huang, C. Peng, X. Chen, and F. Wen, “Dynamics analysis of a class of delayed economic model,” Abstract and Applied Analysis, vol. 2013, Article ID 962738, 12 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet