Research Article
Feature Based Stereo Matching Using Two-Step Expansion
Table 2
Comparative performance of stereo algorithms according to Middlebury methodology.
| ā | Tsukuba | Venus | Teddy | Cones | ā | Nonocc | All | Disc | Nonocc | All | Disc | Nonocc | All | Disc | Nonocc | All | Disc |
| Ours | 2.57 | 3.13 | 10.8 | 3.34 | 3.49 | 13.1 | 5.44 | 7.84 | 12.1 | 3.41 | 8.30 | 9.21 | GC | 1.67 | 3.75 | 8.20 | 0.83 | 2.37 | 8.12 | 9.72 | 18.8 | 17.2 | 4.51 | 15.0 | 11.2 | CSBP | 1.74 | 3.84 | 9.10 | 1.09 | 2.52 | 12.9 | 8.18 | 17.3 | 20.6 | 4.07 | 14.2 | 11.3 | DP | 3.43 | 4.23 | 9.85 | 6.50 | 7.43 | 17.4 | 7.11 | 14.9 | 13.4 | 6.52 | 15.1 | 15.1 | SO | 4.23 | 6.21 | 10.7 | 5.14 | 6.58 | 17.0 | 11.3 | 20.2 | 18.6 | 8.76 | 18.8 | 16.1 |
|
|