Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2014, Article ID 485016, 13 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/485016
Research Article

A Hybrid Fuzzy Analytic Network Process Approach to the New Product Development Selection Problem

Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Yuan Ze University, 135 Yuan-Tung Road, Chung-Li 320, Taiwan

Received 27 February 2014; Revised 24 May 2014; Accepted 25 May 2014; Published 18 June 2014

Academic Editor: Changzhi Wu

Copyright © 2014 Chiuh-Cheng Chyu and Ying-Chieh Fang. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. P. Koen, G. Ajamian, R. Burkart et al., “Providing clarity and a common language to the ‘fuzzy front end’,” Research Technology Management, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 46–55, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. R. L. Keeney and H. Raiffa, Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs, Wiley, New York, NY, USA, 1976. View at MathSciNet
  3. F. Herrera, E. Herrera-Viedma, and J. L. Verdegay, “A sequential selection process in group decision making with a linguistic assessment approach,” Information Sciences, vol. 85, no. 4, pp. 223–239, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. H. Rasmy, S. M. Lee, W. F. Abd El-Wahed, A. M. Ragab, and M. M. El-Sherbiny, “An expert system for multiobjective decision making: application of fuzzy linguistic preferences and goal programming,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 127, no. 2, pp. 209–220, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  5. W. Pedrycz and M. Song, “Analytic Hierarchy process (AHP) in group decision making and its optimization with an allocation of information granularity,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 527–539, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. T. L. Saaty and M. Takizawa, “Dependence and independence: from linear hierarchies to nonlinear networks,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 229–237, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  7. T. L. Saaty, Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process, RWS publications, Pittsburgh, Pa, USA, 1996.
  8. T. L. Saaty, Decision Making for Leaders: The Analytic Hierarchy Process for Decisions in a Complex World, RWS publications, Pittsburgh, Pa, USA, 1999.
  9. Y.-C. Lee and S.-Y. Huang, “A new fuzzy concept approach for Kano's model,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 4479–4484, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. J. Liou and Y.-T. Chuang, “Developing a hybrid multi-criteria model for selection of outsourcing providers,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 3755–3761, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J. L. Yang and G. Tzeng, “An integrated MCDM technique combined with DEMATEL for a novel cluster-weighted with ANP method,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 1417–1424, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. Y.-C. Shen, G. T. Lin, and G.-H. Tzeng, “Combined DEMATEL techniques with novel MCDM for the organic light emitting diode technology selection,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 1468–1481, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. H.-M. Hsu and C.-T. Chen, “Aggregation of fuzzy opinions under group decision making,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 279–285, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  14. H.-S. Shih, H.-J. Shyur, and E. S. Lee, “An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making,” Mathematical and Computer Modelling, vol. 45, no. 7-8, pp. 801–813, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J.-L. Deng, “Grey entropy and grey target decision making,” Journal of Grey System, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 1–4, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  16. J. W. Lee and S. H. Kim, “Using analytic network process and goal programming for interdependent information system project selection,” Computers and Operations Research, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 367–382, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  17. E. E. Karsak, S. Sozer, and S. E. Alptekin, “Product planning in quality function deployment using a combined analytic network process and goal programming approach,” Computers and Industrial Engineering, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 171–190, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. R. P. Mohanty, R. Agarwal, A. K. Choudhury, and M. K. Tiwari, “A fuzzy ANP-based approach to R&D project selection: a case study,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 43, no. 24, pp. 5199–5216, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  19. A. Agarwal, R. Shankar, and M. K. Tiwari, “Modeling the metrics of lean, agile and leagile supply chain: an ANP-based approach,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 173, no. 1, pp. 211–225, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. Y.-C. Hu, J.-H. Wang, and R.-Y. Wang, “Evaluating the performance of Taiwan Homestay using analytic network Process,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2012, Article ID 827193, 24 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. H.-J. Shyur, “COTS evaluation using modified TOPSIS and ANP,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 177, no. 1, pp. 251–259, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. M. Daǧdeviren, “A hybrid multi-criteria decision-making model for personnel selection in manufacturing systems,” Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 451–460, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. P.-F. Hsu, “Selection model based on ANP and GRA for independent media agencies,” Quality and Quantity, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. C.-M. Wu, C.-L. Hsieh, and K.-L. Chang, “A hybrid multiple criteria decision making model for supplier selection,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2013, Article ID 324283, 8 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. R. Azimi, A. Yazdani-Chamzini, M. M. Fouladgar, E. K. Zavadskas, and M. H. Basiri, “Ranking the strategies of mining sector through ANP and TOPSIS in a SWOT framework,” Journal of Business Economics and Management, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 670–689, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. K. Matzler and H. H. Hinterhuber, “How to make product development projects more successful by integrating Kano's model of customer satisfaction into quality function deployment,” Technovation, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 25–38, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. C. Kahraman, D. Ruan, and I. Doǧan, “Fuzzy group decision-making for facility location selection,” Information Sciences, vol. 157, no. 1–4, pp. 135–153, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. T.-Y. Chou, C.-L. Hsu, and M.-C. Chen, “A fuzzy multi-criteria decision model for international tourist hotels location selection,” International Journal of Hospitality Management, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 293–301, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. C. Kahraman, U. Cebeci, and D. Ruan, “Multi-attribute comparison of catering service companies using fuzzy AHP: the case of Turkey,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 171–184, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. A. Kaboli, M. B. Aryanezhad, K. Shahanaghi, and I. Niroomand, “A new method for plant location selection problem: a fuzzy-AHP approach,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC '07), pp. 582–586, October 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. C. Kahraman, I. Kaya, and S. Cebi, “A comparative analysis for multiattribute selection among renewable energy alternatives using fuzzy axiomatic design and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process,” Energy, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 1603–1616, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. H.-Y. Kang, A. H. Lee, C.-C. Chang, and M.-S. Kang, “A model for selecting technologies in new product development,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2012, Article ID 358129, 17 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. C.-L. Hwang and K. Yoon, Multiple Attribute Decision Making, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1981. View at MathSciNet
  34. K. Yoon and C.-L. Hwang, “Manufacturing plant location analysis by multiple attribute decision making: part I-single-plant strategy,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 345–359, 1985. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. D. Choudhary and R. Shankar, “An STEEP-fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS framework for evaluation and selection of thermal power plant location: a case study from India,” Energy, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 510–521, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. C. K. Kwong and S. M. Tam, “Case-based reasoning approach to concurrent design of low power transformers,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 128, no. 1–3, pp. 136–141, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. M.-F. Chen and G.-H. Tzeng, “Combining grey relation and TOPSIS concepts for selecting an expatriate host country,” Mathematical and Computer Modelling, vol. 40, no. 13, pp. 1473–1490, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. A. S. Milani, A. Shanian, R. Madoliat, and J. A. Nemes, “The effect of normalization norms in multiple attribute decision making models: a case study in gear material selection,” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 312–318, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. Z. Hui-Ru and L. Na-Na, “A novel hybrid evaluation model for the performance of ERP project based on ANP and improved matter-element extension model,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2013, Article ID 913212, 9 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. N. Kano, N. Seraku, F. Takahashi, and S. Tsuji, “Attractive quality and must-be quality,” The Journal of the Japanese Society for Quality Control, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 39–48, 1984. View at Google Scholar
  41. S. Bhattacharyya and Z. Rahman, “Capturing the customer's voice, the centerpiece of strategy making: a case study in banking,” European Business Review, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 128–138, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  42. R. Florez-Lopez and J. M. Ramon-Jeronimo, “Managing logistics customer service under uncertainty: an integrative fuzzy Kano framework,” Information Sciences, vol. 202, pp. 41–57, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. E. Fontela and A. Gabus, The DEMATEL Observer, Battelle Institute, Geneva Research Center, Geneva, Switzerland, 1976.
  44. J. N. Warfield, Societal Systems: Planning, Policy, and Complexity, World Scientific, River Edge, NJ, USA, 1976.
  45. G.-H. Tzeng, C.-H. Chiang, and C.-W. Li, “Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: a novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 1028–1044, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. Y.-P. Yang, H.-M. Shieh, J.-D. Leu, and G.-H. Tzeng, “A novel hybrid MCDM model combined with DEMATEL and ANP with applications,” International Journal of Operations Research, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 160–168, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  47. Y.-C. Shen, G. T. Lin, and G.-H. Tzeng, “Combined DEMATEL techniques with novel MCDM for the organic light emitting diode technology selection,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 1468–1481, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. H. Tamura and K. Akazawa, “Structural modeling and systems analysis of uneasy factors for realizing safe, secure and reliable society,” Journal of Telecommunications and Information Technology, vol. 3, pp. 64–72, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  49. L. M. Meade and A. Presley, “R&D project selection using the analytic network process,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 59–66, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. P. Fahrni and M. Spätig, “An application-oriented guide to R&D project selection and evaluation methods,” R&D Management, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 155–171, 1990. View at Google Scholar