Effects of a Cooperative Learning Strategy on the Effectiveness of Physical Fitness Teaching and Constraining Factors

Table 3

Posttest mean and 𝑡-test analyses between cooperative learning group and traditional learning group.

Group	Physical fitness variable	Degree of freedom	Mean	SD	𝑡	𝑃
Cooperative	Body mass (kg/m^2)	58	21.05	5.86	−0.74	.640
Traditional			21.75	4.54
Cooperative	Sit-and-reach (cm)	58	25.30	6.08	−1.87	.082
Traditional			23.75	4.65
Cooperative	Bent-knee sit-up (times)	58	28	8.76	−4.87	.001*
Traditional			24	6.43
Cooperative	Standing long jump (cm)	58	146	25.20	−1.97	.067
Traditional			140	24.87
Cooperative	800 m running (sec)	58	290	115.60	−4.02	.001*
Traditional			303	126.16

^∗𝑃<.001.