#### Abstract

We study an optimal control problem governed by a semilinear parabolic equation, whose control variable is contained only in the boundary condition. An existence theorem for the optimal control is obtained.

#### 1. Introduction

Control theory is a mathematical description of how to act optimally to gain future rewards. Since the necessary conditions of optimal problems were established for the deterministic control systems by Pontryagin’s group [1] in the 1950s and 1960s, a lot of work has been done not only on the deterministic case but also on the stochastic case. To understand the deterministic case of optimal control problems governed by partial differential equations, we can see the classical book written by Lions [2] in 1971. And to the stochastic case, we can see [3–8] and so forth. The boundary control problems of stochastic partial differential equations have been developing fast and very active in recent years, including the boundary exact controllability [9, 10] and the maximum principle for boundary control [11].

In our paper, this kind of boundary control problem is extensively studied in many papers in the case of deterministic control systems. For example, we can see Chai [12]. But in the stochastic case, as we known, there are only a few results for this problem. One of the difficulties is that the properties of the solution of the state equation are not clear compared with the deterministic case.

In many papers, the authors only assume that the optimal controls exist for their problems, and they have not proved the existence. In our life, we always only want to use the necessary conditions to find the optimal control and achieve our goal, but the existence for the control problems is also important. Some useful results have been obtained, for instance, in [13–16]. About the control problems governed by semilinear parabolic equations, we can see [17, 18]. In this paper, the necessary conditions for our problem have been worked out by a member of our team in the paper [19]. So, in this paper, we only consider the existence of the optimal control as a complement for [19].

The rest of this paper is organized as follows. Section 2 begins with a general formulation of our stochastic optimal control problem. In Section 3, we give two important lemmas of our problem. And we give the existence result of the optimal control in Section 4.

#### 2. Preliminaries

Let be a complete probability space, equipped with a right-continuous filtration , on which a -dimensional mutually independent standard Brownian motion is defined. Moreover, we assume that is the augmentation of by all the -null sets of . For a fixed , we denote the -algebra of predictable sets on by . Let be an open bounded subset in with a smooth boundary . Let and , and stands for the -algebra of all Borel subsets of , where is a topological space. denotes the corresponding square-integral space, and denotes the Sobolev space . The positive constants and can be different in different place throughout this paper.

Let be the set of satisfying the following:(1) is -measurable and -adapted;(2), where denotes the usual -dimensional Lebesgue measure on .

The set of admissible controls is a convex, closed subset of .

Now we consider the following stochastic distributed control system with -value control processes in : where (-a.s.) is -adapted, and the differential operators , are defined as follows: where denotes the outward unit normal vector to at the point . We can see [12] for more details to the Neumann boundary condition in the trace sense. , are -value functions and is a -value function.

The cost functional is defined as follows: where denotes the adapted solution of the state equation (1) corresponding to and , , are -value functions.

From the above content, our optimal control problem can be stated as follows.

*Problem (P)*. Find a such that
Any satisfying the above identity is called an optimal control, and the corresponding state is called an optimal trajectory. is called an optimal pair.

We assume that the following conditions hold.

() The coefficients , , , , , and are measurable in with values in the sets of real symmetrical matrices, , , , , and , respectively. The real function is -measurable and , where is a positive constant. And the functions , , , , , and are all bounded by in absolute value. Furthermore, the matrix is uniformly positive definite, which means for a constant .

() Consider , , and to be functions which satisfy the following properties:(i) is -measurable, is -measurable, and is -measurable;(ii) and ;(iii)there exists a positive constant such that, for , we have uniformly in and uniformly in and for almost every .

() Consider , , and to be maps such that the following conditions are satisfied:(i) is -measurable, is -measurable, and is -measurable;(ii) and for every and ;(iii), are continuous and continuously differentiable functions with respect to the state and is a continuous and continuously differentiable function with respect to the state and the control variable ; moreover, there exists a constant such that

#### 3. Some Basic Lemmas

First, we give the definition of solution of the state equation (1).

*Definition 1. *We say a function is a weak solution of the state equation (1), if it satisfies
for every and almost every .

Lemma 2 (Yu and Liu [19]). *Let the conditions () and () hold; then the state equation (1) has a unique (weak) solution for every control . Moreover, there exists a constant such that
*

*Remark 3. *We can see that, by Lemma 2, the cost functional can be denoted by for simplicity.

Lemma 4. *Let one designate by the solution of the state equation (1) corresponding to and suppose that weakly in . Then, for any fixed , one has
*

*Proof. *From the state equation (1), we have
By the definition of the operators , , we apply Itô’s formula to , and then we can get
By , it follows that
For any fixed ,
Thanks to Lemma 2 and because the imbedding
is compact, we can obtain
From the conditions -, using Young’s inequality, it follows that
where is a constant.

Hence, our conclusion follows.

#### 4. The Existence of the Optimal Control

In this section, we give our main result based on the above lemmas.

Theorem 5 (existence of the optimal control). *One assumes hold together with the following additional conditions: *(i)*the function is convex for each ;*(ii)*there exists a such that the set is bounded in .**Then there exists at least one optimal control for Problem (P).*

* Proof. *Thanks to the conditions and Lemma 2, it is easy to verify that is finite for each .

Now we fix a , and we can find a minimizing sequence for . Let be the corresponding states, that is, the solutions of (1) corresponding to . By condition (ii), there exists a constant such that
Hence, we can assume that
for some (because is a closed set ).

Combining the conclusions of Lemmas 2 and 4, we can deduce that

On the other hand, by Mazur's theorem (see, for instance, [20]), we can find a sequence of convex combinations ; that is,
such that

Now, using the convexity of with respect to , by the dominated convergence theorem and condition , we obtain
That means is an optimal control for Problem (P).

*Remark 6. *In this paper, we give a new method to study the existence of the optimal control for stochastic control problems. And we also can see that, compared to the necessary conditions, we need to give some additional conditions to obtain the existence result. So the existence problems are harder to be considered.

#### Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

#### Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported by the Special Fund of Basic Scientific Research of Central Colleges (Grant no. CZQ14021). This work was partially supported by the Teaching Research Fund of South-Central University for Nationalities (JYX13023).