Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 539596, 12 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/539596
Research Article

Energy and Environmental Efficiency of China’s Transportation Sector: A Multidirectional Analysis Approach

School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China, No. 96 Jinzhai Road, Hefei, Anhui 230026, China

Received 19 March 2014; Accepted 14 April 2014; Published 12 May 2014

Academic Editor: X. Zhang

Copyright © 2014 Gongbing Bi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. K. Wang, Y. M. Wei, and X. Zhang, “Energy and emissions efficiency of Chinese regions: a multidirectional efficiency analysis,” Applied Energy, vol. 104, pp. 105–116, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. State Council of the People's Republic of China (SCPRC), The 12th Five Year Plan of China, 2011, (Chinese).
  3. W. Lu, “Potential energy savings and environmental impacts of energy efficiency standards for vapor compression central air conditioning units in China,” Energy Policy, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 1709–1717, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. Y. Hu, “Implementation of voluntary agreements for energy efficiency in China,” Energy Policy, vol. 35, no. 11, pp. 5541–5548, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. Watanabe and K. Tanaka, “Efficiency analysis of Chinese industry: a directional distance function approach,” Energy Policy, vol. 35, no. 12, pp. 6323–6331, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. Y. Bian and F. Yang, “Resource and environment efficiency analysis of provinces in China: a DEA approach based on Shannon's entropy,” Energy Policy, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 1909–1917, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. T.-L. Yeh, T.-Y. Chen, and P.-Y. Lai, “A comparative study of energy utilization efficiency between Taiwan and China,” Energy Policy, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 2386–2394, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. K. Wang, S. Yu, and W. Zhang, “China's regional energy and environmental efficiency: a DEA window analysis based dynamic evaluation,” Mathematical and Computer Modelling, vol. 58, no. 5-6, pp. 1117–1127, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. International Energy Agency, CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion, IEA, Paris, France, 2009.
  10. International Energy Agency, CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion Highlights, IEA, Cancun, Mexico, 2011.
  11. A. Charnes, W. W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes, “Measuring the efficiency of decision making units,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 429–444, 1978. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. W. W. Cooper, L. M. Seiford, and J. Zhu, Eds., Handbook on Data Envelopment Analysis, Kluwer Academic, London, UK, 2004.
  13. W. D. Cook and L. M. Seiford, “Data envelopment analysis (DEA)—thirty years on,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 192, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. P. Zhou, B. W. Ang, and K. L. Poh, “A survey of data envelopment analysis in energy and environmental studies,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 189, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J.-L. Hu and S.-C. Wang, “Total-factor energy efficiency of regions in China,” Energy Policy, vol. 34, no. 17, pp. 3206–3217, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. B. Zhang, J. Bi, Z. Fan, Z. Yuan, and J. Ge, “Eco-efficiency analysis of industrial system in China: a data envelopment analysis approach,” Ecological Economics, vol. 68, no. 1-2, pp. 306–316, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. G.-M. Shi, J. Bi, and J.-N. Wang, “Chinese regional industrial energy efficiency evaluation based on a DEA model of fixing non-energy inputs,” Energy Policy, vol. 38, no. 10, pp. 6172–6179, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. K. Wang, Y.-M. Wei, and X. Zhang, “A comparative analysis of China's regional energy and emission performance: Which is the better way to deal with undesirable outputs?” Energy Policy, vol. 46, pp. 574–584, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. Q. Wang, P. Zhou, and D. Zhou, “Efficiency measurement with carbon dioxide emissions: the case of China,” Applied Energy, vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 161–166, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. L. Wang, L. Xu, and H. Song, “Environmental performance evaluation of Beijing's energy use planning,” Energy Policy, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 3483–3498, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. Z.-H. Wang, H.-L. Zeng, Y.-M. Wei, and Y.-X. Zhang, “Regional total factor energy efficiency: an empirical analysis of industrial sector in China,” Applied Energy, vol. 97, pp. 115–123, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. F. Wu, L. W. Fan, P. Zhou, and D. Q. Zhou, “Industrial energy efficiency with CO2 emissions in China: a nonparametric analysis,” Energy Policy, vol. 49, pp. 164–172, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. Y. Choi, N. Zhang, and P. Zhou, “Efficiency and abatement costs of energy-related CO2 emissions in China: a slacks-based efficiency measure,” Applied Energy, vol. 98, pp. 198–208, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. M. Asmild and K. Matthews, “Multi-directional efficiency analysis of efficiency patterns in Chinese banks 1997–2008,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 219, no. 2, pp. 434–441, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. R. Fare, S. Grosskopf, C. A. K. Lovell, and C. Pasurka, “Multilateral productivity comparisons when some outputs are undesirable: a nonparametric approach,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 71, pp. 90–98, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. P. Zhou, B. W. Ang, and H. Wang, “Energy and CO2 emission performance in electricity generation: a non-radial directional distance function approach,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 221, pp. 625–635, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  27. H. Fukuyama and W. L. Weber, “A directional slacks-based measure of technical inefficiency,” Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 274–287, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. P. Zhou, K. L. Poh, and B. W. Ang, “A non-radial DEA approach to measuring environmental performance,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 178, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. H. Fukuyama, Y. Yoshida, and S. Managi, “Modal choice between air and rail: a social efficiency benchmarking analysis that considers CO2 emissions,” Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 89–102, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. C. P. Barros, S. Managi, and R. Matousek, “The technical efficiency of the Japanese banks: non-radial directional performance measurement with undesirable output,” Omega, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. R. Ramanathan, “A holistic approach to compare energy efficiencies of different transport modes,” Energy Policy, vol. 28, no. 11, pp. 743–747, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. J. Tongzon, “Efficiency measurement of selected Australian and other international ports using data envelopment analysis,” Transportation Research A: Policy and Practice, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 107–122, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. R. Färe, S. Grosskopf, D.-W. Noh, and W. Weber, “Characteristics of a polluting technology: theory and practice,” Journal of Econometrics, vol. 126, no. 2, pp. 469–492, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. P. Bogetoft and J. L. Hougaard, “Efficiency evaluations based on potential (non-proportional) improvements,” Journal of Productivity Analysis, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 233–247, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. P. Bogetoft and J. L. Hougaard, “Super efficiency evaluations based on potential slack,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 152, no. 1, pp. 14–21, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. M. Asmild and J. T. Pastor, “Slack free MEA and RDM with comprehensive efficiency measures,” Omega, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 475–483, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. M. Asmild, T. Holvad, J. L. Hougaard, and D. Kronborg, “Railway reforms: do they influence operating efficiency?” Transportation, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 617–638, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. T. Holvad, J. L. Hougaard, D. Kronborg, and H. K. Kvist, “Measuring inefficiency in the Norwegian bus industry using multi-directional efficiency analysis,” Transportation, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 349–369, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. R. Färe and C. A. Knox Lovell, “Measuring the technical efficiency of production,” Journal of Economic Theory, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 150–162, 1978. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. A. Charnes, W. W. Cooper, B. Golany, L. Seiford, and J. Stutz, “Foundations of data envelopment analysis for Pareto-Koopmans efficient empirical production functions,” Journal of Econometrics, vol. 30, no. 1-2, pp. 91–107, 1985. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. C. A. Knox Lovell, J. T. Pastor, and J. A. Turner, “Measuring macroeconomic performance in the OECD: a comparison of European and non-European countries,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 507–518, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. W. W. Cooper, K. S. Park, and J. T. Pastor, “RAM: a range adjusted measure of inefficiency for use with additive models, and relations to other models and measures in DEA,” Journal of Productivity Analysis, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 5–42, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. J. T. Pastor, J. L. Ruiz, and I. Sirvent, “An enhanced DEA Russell graph efficiency measure,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 115, no. 3, pp. 596–607, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. K. Tone, “A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 143, no. 1, pp. 32–41, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. J. Zhu, “Data envelopment analysis vs. principal component analysis: an illustrative study of economic performance of Chinese cities,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 111, no. 1, pp. 50–61, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. C.-C. Lee, “Energy consumption and GDP in developing countries: a cointegrated panel analysis,” Energy Economics, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 415–427, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. National Bureau of Statistics of China (NBSC), China Energy Statistical Year Book, China Statistics Press, Beijing, China, 2007b–2011b.
  48. National Bureau of Statistics of China (NBSC), China Statistical Year Book, China Statistics Press, Beijing, China, 2007a–2011a.
  49. IPCC, “IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories,” 2006, http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/vol2.html.
  50. National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC), National Greenhouse Gas Inventory of the People's Republic of China, Chinese Environmental Science Press, Beijing, China, 2007, (Chinese).