Research Article
A Systematic Evaluation Model for Solar Cell Technologies
Table 10
Performance of alternatives with respect to each criterion.
| Criteria | Alternatives | | | | | |
| () Mass production technology | 0.232 | 0.232 | 0.208 | 0.205 | 0.123 | () Delivery-on-time rate | 0.179 | 0.233 | 0.217 | 0.214 | 0.157 | () Material usage reduction | 0.267 | 0.277 | 0.194 | 0.165 | 0.098 | () Conversion efficiency | 0.272 | 0.266 | 0.185 | 0.170 | 0.106 | () Yield rate | 0.318 | 0.153 | 0.169 | 0.179 | 0.183 | () Equipment technology | 0.324 | 0.148 | 0.155 | 0.179 | 0.194 | () Policy/regulation requirement | 0.302 | 0.153 | 0.171 | 0.190 | 0.184 | () Power generation stability | 0.177 | 0.218 | 0.200 | 0.200 | 0.206 | () R and D capability and speed | 0.192 | 0.220 | 0.182 | 0.198 | 0.208 | () Market scale and growth | 0.203 | 0.212 | 0.184 | 0.199 | 0.202 | () Production cost | 0.159 | 0.221 | 0.140 | 0.229 | 0.251 | () Investment cost | 0.151 | 0.169 | 0.136 | 0.244 | 0.301 | () Product quality and reliability | 0.205 | 0.144 | 0.192 | 0.218 | 0.242 | () Material cost | 0.163 | 0.174 | 0.150 | 0.220 | 0.294 | () Financial capability | 0.244 | 0.114 | 0.213 | 0.204 | 0.225 | () Fossil fuels price | 0.239 | 0.107 | 0.223 | 0.206 | 0.225 | () Environmental pollution of production | 0.244 | 0.128 | 0.192 | 0.212 | 0.225 | () Material source | 0.224 | 0.133 | 0.172 | 0.198 | 0.272 |
|
|