Research Article  Open Access
Discrete Fractional COSHAD Transform and Its Application
Abstract
In recent years, there has been a renewed interest in finding methods to construct orthogonal transforms. This interest is driven by the large number of applications of the orthogonal transforms in image analysis and compression, especially for colour images. Inspired by this motivation, this paper first introduces a new orthogonal transform known as a discrete fractional COSHAD (FrCOSHAD) using the Kronecker product of eigenvectors and the eigenvalues of the COSHAD kernel functions. Next, this study discusses the properties of the FrCOSHAD kernel function, such as angle additivity. Using the algebra of quaternions, the study presents quaternion COSHAD/FrCOSHAD transforms to represent colour images in a holistic manner. This paper also develops an inverse polynomial reconstruction method (IPRM) in the discrete COSHAD/FrCOSHAD domains. This method can effectively recover a piecewise smooth signal from the finite set of its COSHAD/FrCOSHAD coefficients, with high accuracy. The convergence theorem has proved that the partial sum of COSHAD provides a spectrally accurate approximation to the underlying piecewise smooth signal. The experimental results verify the numerical stability and accuracy of the proposed methods.
1. Introduction
With the development of fast algorithms, the discrete cosine transform (DCT) and the Hadamard transform have been widely used in signal processing and image processing, most prominently in the compressed representations of images [1–3]. The DCT is a realtoreal and integertoreal transform that has been considered as an alternative to the Fourier transform for spectral analysis. The DCT has the additional advantage that its forward and inverse forms are identical, thus, simplifying implementation. The Hadamard transform is highly practical for representing signals, images, and mobile communications, mainly because the elements of the Hadamard matrix are either or −1. Thus, the computation of the transform of a signal consists of additions and subtractions of the signal samples. The Hadamard transform and many of its variations, such as the sequencyordered complex Hadamard transform (SCHT) [4, 5] and the Jacket transform [6], have been proposed, and their applications to image processing and communications have been reported [7].
In recent decades, various factional series and transforms have been introduced and have found application in many fields in engineering [8–11]. In [10], Pei and Yeh developed a recursive method to obtain Hadamard eigenvectors, and normalised eigenvectors were used to define the discrete fractional Hadamard transform. As an alternative to the recursive method, Tseng [12] investigated the eigenstructure of the Hadamard transform for defining its fractional transform and found that the Kronecker product is more suitable for calculating the eigenvalues and the eigenvectors of the Hadamard kernel function.
As another application of the Kronecker product, the COSHAD kernel function was first introduced by Merchant and Rao [13]. COSHAD stands for a hybrid version of discrete Cosine and Hadamard transform. The COSHAD kernel function is also a hybrid function derived from the Kronecker product of the DCT and Hadamard kernel functions. The motivation for developing the COSHAD transform is to compromise between these two transforms in terms of implementation, properties, and applications. However, the study of COSHAD is far from complete and mainly limited within its fast algorithms and filtering applications in the same paper [13]. Although these transforms are remarkable as a type of discrete orthogonal transform, the signal and image representation abilities of COSHAD have not been investigated. Almost no literature addresses the energy compaction of COSHAD. Furthermore, the motivation behind the development of the COSHAD is to seek the combination of the advantages of the two transforms. How can the investigator compromise between these two transforms according to performance and computational burden? What type of impact parameter is produced in the COSHAD kernel function? Further study of the COSHAD transform is, therefore, necessary.
The objective of this paper is twofold. First, we report a relatively complete study of the representation capabilities of the COSHAD transform. Another new orthogonal transform, named the fractional COSHAD (FrCOSHAD) transform, and its properties are proposed from the eigendecomposition of the COSHAD kernel function. The FrCOSHAD is a generalisation of the COSHAD transform that will reduce to the COSHAD transform when the fractional order of the FrCOSHAD kernel function is unity. The advantage of the generalisation is that the FrCOSHAD contains more parameters and is, therefore, more flexible for whatever application it will be used for. Besides, this paper defines the socalled quaternion FrCOSHAD (QFrCOSHAD) to encode colour images as vector fields and investigates their energy compaction properties theoretically. The advantage of such a representation is that a colour image can be treated in a holistic manner, and each pixel can be handled as a vector.
Second, we represent a signal from a limited number of terms in the partial sum of the COSHAD/FrCOSHAD series with high accuracy. The number of terms in the expansion is known to be increased; the series approximation converges in the region where the function is smooth. However, the overshoot near the discontinuity is never reduced, no matter how many terms are included in the partial sum. Furthermore, the numerical requirements grow dramatically with the increase in the number of harmonics. The expectation, in practice, is that the signal could be reconstructed from much less data at a high level of quality. To solve this problem, this study follows the main description of the inverse polynomial reconstruction method (IPRM) for the continuous Fourier series expansion [14–16] and derives a mathematics framework of the IPRM for the discrete COSHAD/FrCOSHAD series expansion to accurately recover a piecewise smooth signal. The spectral convergence of the proposed IPRM strategy in the discrete COSHAD expansion is discussed and proven, both theoretically and numerically.
The remainder of this paper is organised as follows. Section 2 provides a brief review of the discrete COSHAD transform. Section 3 introduces the discrete FrCOSHAD transform and its main properties. The quaternion discrete COSHAD/FrCOSHAD transforms based on quaternion algebra are also defined in this section. The derivation of the COSHADbased 1D IPRM and the convergence properties are presented in Section 4. Section 5 reports the simulation results for the standard testing images and provides the numerical verification of the convergence theorems. Finally, in Section 6, we summarise the results and conclude the paper.
2. Review of the COSHAD Transform
This section is devoted to a review of the results about the discrete COSHAD transform defined in [13], which may not be widely known. We start by defining the 1D forward COSHAD transform of order in the following form: where , is the length of signal , is the data vector, and is the transform vector. The th order COSHAD kernel function (transform matrix) is defined as and the symbol represents the Kronecker product. [DCT()] and [HAD()] are DCT (of size ) and Hadamard kernel functions (of size ), respectively. In this paper, we rely heavily on Corollary 13.8 in [17] as follows.
Corollary 1. If is orthogonal and is orthogonal, then is orthogonal.
According to Corollary 1, the defined [] is an orthogonal kernel function that belongs to a family of discrete orthogonal matrices ranging from the Hadamard kernel function () to the DCT kernel function (). Thus, the inverse COSHAD transform is defined as where denotes the matrix transpose. The 2D forward COSHAD transform of an matrix is defined by The corresponding inverse COSHAD transform can be calculated as
3. The Discrete FrCOSHAD Transform and Its Properties
3.1. The Discrete FrCOSHAD Transform
According to the Kronecker product properties [17] and the definition of the Hadamard transform, one can rewrite the Hadamard kernel function as follows: If the lowestorder Hadamard kernel function [] is expressed as Substituting (6) into (2), the COSHAD kernel function can be rewritten as If the eigendecompositions of the matrices [DCT()] and [HAD(1)] are respectively, and are the matrices composed of eigenvectors. We also need to use the following properties of the Kronecker, which are 13.12 in [17].
Property 1. Let have eigenvalues , , and let have eigenvalues , . Then, the eigenvalues of are , .
Therefore, the eigendecomposition of [] can be written in the following form:
where , and . After the eigenvalues of the [] are determined, we define the kernel function of the discrete FrCOSHAD transform by taking the fractional powers of the eigenvalue.
Consider
Thus, the 1D forward FrCOSHAD transform with parameter is
Equation (12) indicates that the FrCOSHAD transform reduces to the standard COSHAD transform if the fractional powers . The corresponding inverse FrCOSHAD transform is written as
Similarly, the 2D forward FrCOSHAD transform with order (, ) is given by
The corresponding inverse FrCOSHAD transform can be generated as
3.2. Properties of the Discrete FrCOSHAD Kernel Function
This subsection presents some properties of the discrete FrCOSHAD kernel function.
Property 2. Additivity:
Proof. From (11), we have The proof is complete.
Because of the additivity property of the FrCOSHAD kernel function, an FrCOSHAD transform with a fractional order operated on by an FrCOSHAD transform with a fractional order will be an FrCOSHAD transform with fractional order (). To evaluate this one basic feature of the FrCOSHAD kernel function, we investigate the performance of the 1D FrCOSHAD transform using a discrete rectangular window function defined as a triangular pulse function of width 100 and the 180th row of the standard graylevel image “Lena” of size 256 × 256 from the USCSIPI image database [18] shown in Figure 1(a). These functions are calculated using the 1D FrCOSHAD transform, and the magnitudes of the resulting outputs with different values of are shown in Table 1. The values of fractional order are taken from the set . The last row of Table 1 is an FrCOSHAD transform with performed by an FrCOSHAD transform with . The transformed results are very close to the FrCOSHAD transformed results with . This result indicates that the angle additivity property holds for the 1D FrCOSHAD transform. Moreover, as Table 1 shows, with the increase of the fractional order , the influence produced by FrCOSHAD becomes more and more obvious.

(a)
(b)
(c)
Property 3. Unitarity:
Proof. Using (11), we have The proof is complete.
3.3. Quaternion Discrete Orthogonal Transform
Traditional methods process colour images by processing each colour channel separately and then summing the three individual outputs to derive the final result. Ell and Sangwine [19] were the first to use quaternions to encode colour images as vector fields. Motivated by their work, this paper defines the socalled QCOSHAD and QFrCOSHAD transforms. We consider here only RGB colour images. The generalisation to other types of colour images is not difficult. Let f be an RGB image; the three channels of the image can be represented using the three components of a pure quaternion as follows: where , , and represent the red, green, and blue components of the colour image, respectively. This representation effectively equates the RGB colour cube to the righthanded coordinate frame imposed by the imaginary part of the quaternion space and treats the colour image as a whole rather than as separate components. As an example, we now introduce the definition of the rightside form of the QFrCOSHAD transform of a function with two variables. Similar methods can be used to obtain the QCOSHAD transform matrices.
Definition 2. Given a quaternion root of −1, , for an colour image , the rightside form of the forward QFrCOSHAD transform of the image is defined using the matrix form as
where and . This choice corresponds to the single coloured line in RGB space, on which all three components are equal. Letting , , and be the discrete FrCOSHAD transforms from (14) for the red, green, and blue components, respectively, of the colour image. Equation (22) can be rewritten as
where
This paper defines the leftside forward QFrCOSHAD transform similarly by interchanging the positions of the colour image and the imaginary part .
Definition 3. Given a quaternion root of −1, , for an colour image , the leftside form of the forward QFrCOSHAD transform of the image is defined as Corresponding to the QFrCOSHAD transform, there are two forms of the inverse QFrCOSHAD transform. The rightside inverse transform satisfies the following equations: where where , , and are the three colour components of the reconstructed image, and , , , and are inverse FrCOSHAD transforms from (15) with respect to , , , and , respectively. The leftside inverse transform is similarly defined as follows:
This study will use the rightside forms and as the default and , respectively, unless stated otherwise. Both and pairs are separable and, thus, may be evaluated with a 1D summation over the rows and the columns of the input array. We naturally wonder whether the additivity property also holds for 2D QFrCOSHAD transform. This experiment is conducted with a colour image “Lena” that contains 512 × 512 pixels, as shown in Figure 1(b). The results of the QFrCOSHAD transform with different values of and are depicted in Figure 2. The last column of Figure 2 shows that the inverse transform results are very close to the results of the original image. The first four columns in Figure 2 show the four components , , , and in (24) of the QFrCOSHAD transform. The last row of Figure 2 indicates that the QFrCOSHAD transform with , , followed by an application of the QFrCOSHAD transform with , , is equivalent to the application of the transform with , . Hence, we can reach the following conclusions. Regardless of what the fraction orders and are, 2D QFrCOSHAD can accurately recover the colour images in the noisefree cases. In addition, similarly to the 1D FrCOSHAD transform case, fractional additivity also holds in the 2D QFrCOSHAD case. Finally, we notice that the large fractional orders and lead to a significant effect for spectral images. In other words, a spectral image with small fractional orders is closer than the original image before the transformation.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
4. COSHADBased IPRM Is Spectrally Convergent
Spectral approximations have been widely implemented in the approximation of signals [20, 21]. The kernel functions very commonly used in spectral partial sum approximations are Fourier, Cosine, Legendre, Chebyshev, and Gegenbauer, and so forth. Sometimes, nonclassical kernel functions have been proven to be very useful for specific purposes. This important reason leads us directly to discuss the possibility of representing a signal from a limited number of expansion coefficients of COSHAD/FrCOSHAD with high accuracy.
The overshoot of an approximation to a function near the discontinuity or the domain boundaries will occur for most approximations based on standard orthogonal expansions [22]. Many effective algorithms have been developed to overcome the overshoot and to improve the spectral accuracy [23–25]. For obtaining IPRM in the discrete COSHAD domain, let us first introduce the explicit expression of the COSHAD kernel function as follows: with In the above, the symbol represents the th row and th column elements of the Hadamard kernel function, “mod” represents a modulo operation, and “[·]” represents the ceiling function. Thus, applying (29), the COSHAD expansion of an unknown function using standard inner product can be obtained; that is where Using (32), the truncated series expansion of a signal using only the first terms of the COSHAD coefficients is given by where
Assume that the original function is analytic and this original function can be expanded in Gegenbauer orthogonal polynomials as follows: where are the Gegenbauer coefficients defined on the Gegenbauer transform domain with is the Gegenbauer polynomial of order with parameter , and is mapped as to satisfy the domain of the Gegenbauer orthogonal polynomials. The purpose of the COSHADbased IPRM method is to find a finite approximation for the unknown function as So the error defined in the following: is orthogonal to the COSHAD transform domain. That is, where By substituting in (32) with from (39), we have By defining the matrix as with matrix elements given by Equation (43) can be rewritten as Equation (46) can also be written in matrix form as where the vectors and are respectively. Under the constraint we can obtain the following Gegenbauer coefficients through the pseudoinversion of by
To prove the convergence of the proposed COSHADbased IPRM, we define the truncation error and the regularisation error as follows
Lemma 4. If satisfies , then
Proof. According to (40)(41), one can obviously obtain Thus, Combining (52) and (56), one has Thus, The lemma is, thus, proven.
Lemma 5. Let be an analytic function. Then, there exists a constant that is independent of , so that the regularisation error function defined in (52) satisfies the following inequality:
Because the IPRM is independent on the basis function [26], we can choose the Chebyshev polynomial in (37) with . Thus, the proof of Lemma 5 can easily be obtained by the same procedure as in [27].
Theorem 6 (spectral convergence). 1D IPRM for the discrete COSHAD expansion is spectrally convergent.
Proof. By Lemmas 4 and 5, if , Let denote the COSHAD approximation of . Using , Therefore, with (31), we have with Due to , for any number , and , for , therefore, Theorem 6 is, thus, proven. Similar methods could be adapted to prove the spectral convergence of 1D FrCOSHADbased IPRM without difficulty.
5. Experimental Results
5.1. Energy Compaction
The purpose of this subsection is to evaluate the coding efficiency of the proposed FrCOSHAD transforms and to compare them with the other transforms. The coding gain [28] of the 1D and 2D cases will be investigated in this subsection. As mentioned above, understanding whether parameters and have an important influence over the coding gain. We first examine the fractional order with two examples where and 3 shown in Figures 3(a) and 3(b), respectively. This figure shows that the higher fractional order would generate a greater coding gain.
(a)
(b)
(c)
In the following experiment, we discuss the influence of parameter on the energy compaction. According to the constraints imposed on the parameters , , , indicated by (1) and (2), we have systematically chosen the parameters as in this experiment where the value of fractional order is fixed at 0.95, and only parameter is adjustable. The plots of coding gain are depicted in Figure 3(c). From this figure, the fifth choice () gives the highest coding gain among all of the test cases. In contrast to fractional order , parameter does not have as obvious an impact on the energy compaction. Only a limited decrease of the coding gain can be observed to respond to the decrease of parameter .
Based on the above test results, we found that the energy compactions of the FrCOSHAD kernel matrix are significantly affected by order and are moderately affected by . This result can be explained because the smaller the value offractional order , the less the effect of the FrCOSHAD transform. The FrCOSHAD kernel function has not fully played a role in the process of transformation. So far as parameter is concerned, the choice of a relatively large corresponding to the case where the emphasis of the kernel function is the DCT properties rather than the Hadamard properties gives a high coding gain. Comparing the DCT and the Hadamard transforms, the DCT transform has a strong energy of compaction property, a wellknown fact. Therefore, this is the main reason why we use such a choice of parameters and, as far as possible, big parameter for compressing the representations of images.
For comparison purposes, we calculated the coding gain with for the several transforms while correlation coefficient is varied from 0.6 to 0.95. Figure 4(a) show that the energy compaction capabilities from high to low in order is DCT, COSHAD, FrCOSHAD, DHT, and the Hadamard transforms. The fractional order of the FrCOSHAD is in this experiment.
(a)
(b)
(c)
A comparison of the results in terms of the 2D coding gains between the traditional 2D transforms (DCT, DHT, and Hadamard) and the proposed transforms as increases is shown in Figures 4(b) and 4(c). The block sizes chosen for the experiment were 16 × 16. Regardless of whether the covariance is separable, the DCT transform consistently presents high coding gains in comparison with all of the other transforms. Both COSHAD and FrCOSHAD transforms had a higher coding efficiency than DHT and Hadamard transforms. The Hadamard transform yields poorer performance than all of the other transforms.
5.2. Applications of the Proposed Transforms to Colour Image Compression
In this subsection, we will compare the reconstructed results from the proposed transforms against QDCT [29], QDHT, and QHadamard. The purpose is to confirm the theoretical analysis regarding the energy compaction. The experiments were conducted on two colour test images (size: 512 × 512) shown in Figures 1(b) and 1(c). We performed all simulations for these images within Matlab 7.11.0 (2010b) under Window environment on an Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU 2.67 GHz processor with 3 GB RAM.
Test images are first divided into equalsized blocks, and each block is then transformed by using the kernel functions. Consequently, we arrange the absolute value of all of the transform coefficients in downward order and take the most significant part according to compression ratio (Cr) to get a recovered image. The universal image quality index (UQI) [30] values of the reconstructed images with respect to the original images “Lena” and “Pepper” are listed in Tables 2 and 3, where denotes the block size used in experiment. According to the theoretical analysis of coding gain illustrated above, the fractional orders in the 2D FrCOSHAD transform were chosen as , . Tables 2 and 3 show that the qualities of the QDCT transform are overall higher than the qualities of the other transforms when Cr is 1 : 2 or 1 : 8. The reconstructed images using the proposed transform with perform not only better than the QCOSHAD/FrCOSHAD with but also better than the QDHT and the QHadamard transforms. We think this is because the effect of the DCT on the FrCOSHAD method with is more obvious because the DCT has nearly optimal properties compared with the statistically optimal KL transform. The QHadamard transform gives the worst reconstructions for all of the test images. Figure 5 shows that the images we cut out from the reconstructed images have no manipulation of any sort, only for viewing more clearly. In spite of having the same , Cr, and , the reconstructed images are quite different: the QDCT, the QCOSHAD, and the QFrCOSHAD transforms produced good results.


(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
The computation times required for reconstruction of colour image “Pepper” are listed in Figure 6. Because of the simplicity of the blockbased strategy, these algorithms can produce fast reconstructions along with relatively good visual qualities. In this test, is chosen for the QCOSHAD/QFrCOSHAD transforms. However, the FrCOSHAD has a moderately computational burden for large block size due to the complexity of the algorithm. Similar results will be obtained with all other choices of the parameters , , and . We omit discussing them, considering the space limit.
Generally speaking, the image representation quality can be severely affected by image noise. For the sake of evaluating the robustness of the proposed transforms against the negative effects of different types of noise, two experiments were conducted using noisecontaminated images. The first type of noise is the salt and pepper noise (5%), while the second type of noise is the Gaussian white noise with zero mean and variance 0.01. We conducted a few comparisons between the proposed approaches and the other schemes. The visual quality of the reconstructed image “Pepper” is measured using PSNR demonstrated in Table 4. Compared with the QDHT and the QHadamard transforms, both the QCOSHAD and the QFrCOSHAD produce a slightly higher PSNR under the same conditions. However, the QDCT produces the highest PSNR of the transforms in all cases with the presence of either Gaussian noise or salt and pepper noise.

In the following experiment, we evaluate the influence of and over the proposed QFrCOSHAD transform for the case of noise. Gaussian white noises with zero mean and variance 0.01 are taken into account in this test. Figure 7 shows the corresponding PSNR values when and vary from 0.5 up to 1. This figure shows that with the increase of fractional orders and , the values of PSNR tend to rise gradually as expected. This example also proves once again that the effectiveness of the FrCOSHAD is severely affected by the fractional order: relatively large and leads to much better reconstructed results.
5.3. Local Representation by the IPRM
In this subsection, we attach three numerical examples that verify the accuracy of the proposed IPRM in the multiintervals. Without loss of generality, we first consider a window function with length on the three subintervals depicted in Figure 8
(a)
(b)
In fact, the generalisation to more than three domains (or one axis) is also straightforward. If the length of signal is not a power of two, zero padding is needed to meet the constraint of the COSHAD kernel matrix (see (1) and (2)). In Figure 8, we show the original function in the solid black line, the approximation through the COSHAD/FrCOSHAD partial sum with in the square dashed line. The COSHAD/FrCOSHAD partial sum approximation is obviously not accurate.
Next, we implement the proposed FrCOSHADbased IPRM method in the following way. The original function is first split into three pieces and solved for the smoother parts of the function in each small interval, and then the approximations are glued together to recover the original function in the full interval. Parameter of the Gegenbauer polynomials was fixed as 0.5 in all numerical examples. We get explicitly the approximate Gegenbauer coefficient , defined in (51) as follows.
For the left interval: , , , and : For the middle interval: , , , and : For the right interval: , , , and : Once the approximate Gegenbauer coefficient is obtained, one can compute the approximation to by directly summing by using (39). If we let , , and note the finite approximation for function in the three subintervals, respectively, we can obtain the following approximation: Similarly, using all of these parameters and only setting fraction order , the approximation to using the IPRM in the discrete COSHAD domain can be computed as follows:
Using the present methods, the solutions are obtained for three subintervals shown in Figure 8. The present strategies clearly provide an exact numerical solution rather than that obtained in the approximation through the COSHAD/FrCOSHAD partial sum methods. To understand the convergence behaviour of the current methods whether independent of the parameters and , the same calculation is conducted using other values. Here, the error, in the maximum norm, between the exact and the reconstructed solution as defined by is used to demonstrate the numerical efficiency and convergence. Table 5 illustrates the logarithmic pointwise errors using present methods with respect to parameters and . There is better convergence behaviour for all of the parameter selections.

The second example considers a more complex piecewise smooth signal with length given by and there are two subintervals of equal length. The solid black line in Figure 9 shows the original piecewise function. Function has the point of discontinuity at 128. The partial sums of the COSHAD/FrCOSHAD series with and can be found in Figure 9. The values of parameters and are chosen as for the COSHAD and and