Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 675895, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/675895
Research Article

Undesirable Outputs’ Presence in Centralized Resource Allocation Model

Department of Mathematics, Islamic Azad University, Central Branch, Tehran, Iran

Received 15 July 2014; Revised 25 August 2014; Accepted 28 August 2014; Published 15 September 2014

Academic Editor: Vikas Kumar

Copyright © 2014 Ghasem Tohidi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. Charnes, W. W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes, “Measuring the efficiency of decision making units,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 429–444, 1978. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  2. R. D. Banker, A. Charnes, and W. W. Cooper, “Some methods for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis,” Management Science, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 1078–1092, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. A. Charnes, W. W. Cooper, B. Golany, L. Seiford, and J. Stutz, “Foundations of data envelopment analysis for Pareto-Koopmans efficient empirical production functions,” Journal of Econometrics, vol. 30, no. 1-2, pp. 91–107, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  4. K. Tone, “A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 130, no. 3, pp. 498–509, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  5. K. Allen, “DEA in the ecological context an overview,” in Data Envelopment Analysis in the Service Sector, G. Wesermann, Ed., pp. 203–235, Gabler, Wiesbaden, Germany, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  6. T. C. Koopman, “Analysis of production as an efficient combination of activities,” in Activity Analysis of Production and Allocation, Cowles Commission, T. C. Koopmans, Ed., pp. 33–97, Wiley, New York, NY, USA, 1951. View at Google Scholar
  7. A. Iqbal Ali and L. M. Seiford, “Translation invariance in data envelopment analysis,” Operations Research Letters, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 403–405, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  8. J. T. Pastor, “Translation invariance in data envelopment analysis: a generalization,” Annals of Operations Research, vol. 66, pp. 93–102, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  9. H. Scheel, “Undesirable outputs in efficiency valuations,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 132, no. 2, pp. 400–410, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. L. M. Seiford and J. Zhu, “Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 142, no. 1, pp. 16–20, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  11. B. Golany and Y. Roll, “An application procedure for DEA,” Omega, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 237–250, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. C. A. K. Lovell and J. T. Pastor, “Units invariant and translation invariant DEA models,” Operations Research Letters, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 147–151, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  13. H. Scheel, “Efficiency measurement system: DEA for windows,” Software, Operations Research and Wirtschafts-informatik, Univeritat Dortmund, 1998,.
  14. W. Liu and J. Sharp, “DEA models via goal programming,” in Data Envelopment Analysis in the Service Sector, G. Westermann, Ed., pp. 79–101, Deutscher Universitatsverlag, Wiesbaden, Germany, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  15. S. Lozano and G. Villa, “Centralized resource allocation using data envelopment analysis,” Journal of Productivity Analysis, vol. 22, no. 1-2, pp. 143–161, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. C. Mar-Molinero, D. Prior, M.-M. Segovia, and F. Portillo, “On centralized resource utilization and its reallocation by using DEA,” Annals of Operations Research, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. P. Korhonen and M. Syrjänen, “Resource allocation based on efficiency analysis,” Management Science, vol. 50, no. 8, pp. 1134–1144, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  18. J. Du, L. Liang, Y. Chen, and G. B. Bi, “DEA-based production planning,” Omega, vol. 38, no. 1-2, pp. 105–112, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. M. Asmild, J. C. Paradi, and J. T. Pastor, “Centralized resource allocation BCC models,” Omega, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 40–49, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, A. A. Noora, G. R. Jahanshahloo, J. Gerami, and M. R. Mozaffari, “Centralized resource allocation for enhanced Russell models,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 235, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  21. M.-M. Yu, C.-C. Chern, and B. Hsiao, “Human resource rightsizing using centralized data envelopment analysis: evidence from Taiwan's airports,” Omega, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 119–130, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. A. Hadi Vencheh, R. Kazemi Matin, and M. Tavassoli Kajani, “Undesirable factors in efficiency measurement,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 163, no. 2, pp. 547–552, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  23. G. R. Jahanshahloo, F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, N. Shoja, G. Tohidi, and S. Razavyan, “Undesirable inputs and outputs in DEA models,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 169, no. 2, pp. 917–925, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  24. J. Wu and D. Guo, “A complete ranking of DMUs with undesirable outputs using restrictions in DEA models,” Mathematical and Computer Modelling, vol. 58, no. 5-6, pp. 1102–1109, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. A. Amirteimoori, S. Kordrostami, and M. Sarparast, “Modeling undesirable factors in data envelopment analysis,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 180, no. 2, pp. 444–452, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus