Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2014, Article ID 704804, 16 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/704804
Research Article

Performance and Risk Assessment of Soil-Structure Interaction Systems Based on Finite Element Reliability Methods

School of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Xiamen University, Fujian 361005, China

Received 22 December 2013; Accepted 3 February 2014; Published 20 March 2014

Academic Editor: Hua-Peng Chen

Copyright © 2014 Quan Gu. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. O. C. Zienkiewicz and R. L. Taylor, The Finite Element Method, vol. 1, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK, 5th edition, 2000, The basis. View at MathSciNet
  2. T. J. R. Hughes, The Finite Element Method: Linear Static and Dynamic Finite Element Analysis, Prentice Hall Publishers, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1987. View at MathSciNet
  3. K. J. Bathe, Finite Element Procedures, Prentice Hall Publishers, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1996.
  4. R. D. Cook, D. S. Malkus, M. E. Plesha, and R. J. Witt, Concepts and Applications of Finite Element Analysis, Wiley, Chichester, UK, 2001.
  5. S. Mazzoni, F. McKenna, and G. L. Fenves, OpenSees Command Language Manual, Pacific Earth-quake Engineering Center, University of California, Berkeley, Calif, USA, 2005, http://opensees.berkeley.edu/.
  6. G. Mylonakis and G. Gazetas, “Seismic soil-structure interaction: beneficial or detrimental?” Journal of Earthquake Engineering, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 277–301, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. B. Jeremić, S. Kunnath, and F. Xiong, “Influence of soil-foundation-structure interaction on seismic response of the I-880 viaduct,” Engineering Structures, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 391–402, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. Y. Tang and J. Zhang, “Probabilistic seismic demand analysis of a slender RC shear wall considering soil-structure interaction effects,” Engineering Structures, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 218–229, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J. Stewart, R. Seed, and G. Fenves, “Seismic soil-structure interaction in buildings. II: empirical findings,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, vol. 125, no. 1, pp. 38–48, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. Der Kiureghian, “Structural reliability methods for seismic safety assessment: a review,” Engineering Structures, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 412–424, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. O. Ditlevsen and H. O. Madsen, Structural Reliability Methods, Wiley, New York, NY, USA, 1996.
  12. Q. Gu, Finite element response sensitivity and reliability analysis of soil-structure-interaction Systems [Ph.D. thesis], Department of Structural Engineering, University of California, San Diego, Calif, USA, 2008.
  13. O. Hagen and L. Tvedt, “Vector process out-crossing as parallel system sensitivity measure,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, vol. 117, no. 10, pp. 2201–2220, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. H. Koo, FORM, SORM and simulation techniques for nonlinear random vibrations [Ph.D. thesis], Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, Calif, USA, 2003.
  15. A. Ang and W. Tang, Probability Concepts in Engineering Planning and Design, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1975.
  16. A. der Kiureghian and J. B. Ke, “The stochastic finite element method in structural reliability,” Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 83–91, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. P. L. Liu and A. Der Kiureghian, “Optimization algorithms for structural reliability,” Structural Safety, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 161–177, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. T. Haukaas and A. Der Kiureghian, “Finite element reliability and sensitivity methods for performance-based engineering,” Report PEER 2003/14, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, Calif, USA, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  19. P. L. Liu and A. der Kiureghian, “Multivariate distribution models with prescribed marginals and covariances,” Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 105–112, 1986. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. A. M. Hasofer and N. C. Lind, “An Exact and Invariant First-order Reliability Format,” Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 111–121, 1974. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. R. Rackwitz and B. Flessler, “Structural reliability under combined random load sequences,” Computers and Structures, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 489–494, 1978. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. P. E. Gill, W. Murray, and M. A. Saunders, “SNOPT: an SQP algorithm for large-scale constrained optimization,” SIAM Review, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 99–131, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  23. Q. Gu, M. Barbato, J. P. Conte, P. E. Gill, and F. McKenna, “OpenSees-SNOPT framework for finite element-based optimization of structural and geotechnical systems,” Journal of Structural Engineering, no. 6, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  24. M. Kleiber and T. D. Hien, The Stochastic Finite Element Method: Basic Perturbation Technique and Computer Implementation, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, 1992, Basic perturbation technique and computer implementation, With a separately available computer disk. View at MathSciNet
  25. M. Kleiber, H. Antunez, T. D. Hien, and P. Kowalczyk, Parameter Sensitivity in Nonlinear Mechanics: Theory and Finite Element Computations, Wiley, New York, NY, USA, 1997.
  26. Y. Zhang and A. der Kiureghian, “Dynamic response sensitivity of inelastic structures,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 108, no. 1-2, pp. 23–36, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. J. P. Conte, “Finite element response sensitivity analysis in earthquake engineering,” Earthquake Engineering Frontiers in the New Millennium, Spencer & Hu, Swets & Zeitlinger, pp. 395–401, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  28. J. P. Conte, P. K. Vijalapura, and M. Meghella, “Consistent finite-element response sensitivity analysis,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, vol. 129, no. 12, pp. 1380–1393, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. J. P. Conte, M. Barabato, and E. Spacone, “Finite element response sensitivity analysis using force-based frame models,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 59, no. 13, pp. 1781–1820, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. Q. Gu, J. P. Conte, A. Elgamal, and Z. Yang, “Finite element response sensitivity analysis of multi-yield-surface J2 plasticity model by direct differentiation method,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 198, no. 30-32, pp. 2272–2285, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. Q. Gu, M. Barbato, and J. P. Conte, “Handling of constraints in finite-element response sensitivity analysis,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, vol. 135, no. 12, pp. 1427–1438, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. Q. Gu and G. Wang, “Direct differentiation method for response sensitivity analysis of a bounding surface plasticity soil model,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, vol. 49, pp. 135–145, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  33. S. K. Au and J. L. Beck, First Excursion Probabilities for Linear Systems by Very Efficient Importance Sampling, Division of Engineering and Applied Science, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, Calif, USA, 2001.
  34. S. O. Rice, “Mathematical analysis of random noise,” The Bell System Technical Journal, vol. 24, pp. 46–156, 1945. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  35. H. O. Madsen, S. Krenk, and N. C. Lind, Methods of Structural Safety, Prentice Hall Publishers, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1986.
  36. A. Der Kiureghian, “Geometry of random vibrations and solutions by FORM and SORM,” Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 81–90, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. J. P. Conte and P. K. Vijalapura, “Seismic safety analysis of concrete gravity dams accounting for both system uncertainty and excitation stochasticity,” A Report on Research Sponsored By the Italian National Power Board (ENEL-CRIS), Department of Civil Engineering, Rice University, Houston, Tex, USA, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  38. B. D. Scott, R. Park, and M. J. N. Priestley, “Stress-strain behavior of concrete confined by overlapping hoops at low and high strain rates,” Journal of the American Concrete Institute, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 13–27, 1982. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. W. M. John, “On structural fatigue under random loading,” Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences, vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 753–762, 1954. View at Google Scholar
  40. P. S. Thomas, Spacecraft Structures and Mechanisms: From Concept to Launch, Microcosm Publishers, Torrance, Ca, USA, 1995.