An Effective Transform Unit Size Decision Method for High Efficiency Video Coding

Table 8

Results of comparison between NNZ-ETDA and proposed method.

Sequence; (QP = 22)	NNZ-ETDA			Proposed			Comparison
	Bit rate; (kb/s)	PSNR; (dB)	Time; (sec)	Bit rate; (kb/s)	PSNR; (dB)	Time; (sec)	ΔBit rate; (%)	ΔPSNR; (dB)	ΔTime; (%)
Traffic	15525	41.68	3671	15644	41.66	3152	0.77	−0.02	14.15
People on street	34076	40.23	9024	34491	40.19	7201	1.22	−0.04	20.20
Kimono	6152	41.87	3848	6233	41.86	2860	1.32	−0.01	25.69
Park scene	8603	40.02	2245	8669	40.01	1936	0.77	−0.01	13.78
Cactus	22833	38.47	2725	23195	38.46	2306	1.59	−0.01	15.39
Basketball drive	13667	39.81	2608	14175	39.80	2134	3.72	−0.01	18.19
BQ terrace	44175	38.04	3571	44540	38.03	2926	0.83	−0.01	18.05
Average	20719	40.02	3956	20992	40.00	3216	1.46	−0.01	17.92