Research Article
Applying a Hybrid MCDM Model for Six Sigma Project Selection
Table 4
The total-influence matrix
and influence given/received for dimensions.
| | | | | | | | | Dimensions | | | | |
| | 0.78 | 0.80 | 0.77 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 0.71 | 4.60 | Strategy () | 4.60 | 4.76 | 9.36 | −0.16 | | 0.79 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 4.57 | Feasibility () | 4.57 | 4.80 | 9.36 | −0.23 | | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 4.55 | Impact on customers () | 4.55 | 4.61 | 9.16 | −0.05 | | 0.84 | 0.85 | 0.81 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.75 | 4.85 | Impact on finance () | 4.85 | 4.65 | 9.49 | 0.20 | | 0.80 | 0.81 | 0.77 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 4.62 | Impact on operations () | 4.62 | 4.54 | 9.16 | 0.09 | | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.67 | 4.43 | Impact on employees () | 4.43 | 4.28 | 8.71 | 0.16 |
| | 4.76 | 4.80 | 4.61 | 4.65 | 4.54 | 4.28 | | | | | | |
|
|