Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2014, Article ID 802976, 12 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/802976
Research Article

Evaluation of Green Port Factors and Performance: A Fuzzy AHP Analysis

1Department of Shipping and Transportation Management, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung 20224, Taiwan
2Department of Transportation Science, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung 20224, Taiwan

Received 4 October 2013; Revised 20 December 2013; Accepted 20 December 2013; Published 12 January 2014

Academic Editor: Ching-Ter Chang

Copyright © 2014 Rong-Her Chiu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), Review of Maritime Transport 2012, United Nations, Geneva, Switzerland, 2012.
  2. M. Gavrilescu and Y. Chisti, “Biotechnology: a sustainable alternative for chemical industry,” Biotechnology Advances, vol. 23, no. 7-8, pp. 471–499, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. G. Brundtland, Our Common Future, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 1987.
  4. B. Dalal-Clayton and S. Bass, Sustainable Development Strategies: A Resource Book, Earthscan, London, UK, 2002.
  5. H. Komiyama and S. Kraines, Vision 2050: Roadmap for a Sustainable Earth, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2008.
  6. C. Vezzoli and E. Manzini, Design and Innovation for Sustainability, Springer, London, UK, 2008.
  7. M. Luo and T. L. Yip, “Ports and the environment,” Maritime Policy and Management, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 401–403, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  8. R. M. Darbra, A. Ronza, T. A. Stojanovic, C. Wooldridge, and J. Casal, “A procedure for identifying significant environmental aspects in sea ports,” Marine Pollution Bulletin, vol. 50, no. 8, pp. 866–874, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. E. Peris-Mora, J. M. D. Orejas, A. Subirats, S. Ibáñez, and P. Alvarez, “Development of a system of indicators for sustainable port management,” Marine Pollution Bulletin, vol. 50, no. 12, pp. 1649–1660, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. Ashar, “The fourth revolution,” in Containerisation International, pp. 57–61, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  11. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), Maritime Transport and the Climate Change Challenge: Summary of Proceedings, United Nations, Geneva, Switzerland, (UNCTAD/DTL/TLB/2009/1), 2009.
  12. H. N. Psaraftis and C. A. Kontovas, “Balancing the economic and environmental performance of maritime transportation,” Transportation Research D, vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 458–462, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. S. Eide, Ø. Endresen, R. Skjong, T. Longva, and S. Alvik, “Cost-effectiveness assessment of CO2 reducing measures in shipping,” Maritime Policy and Management, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 367–384, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. H. Johnson, M. Johansson, K. Andersson, and B. Sodahl, “Will the ship energy efficiency management plan reduce CO2 emissions? A comparison with ISO, 50001 and the ISM code,” Maritime Policy and Management, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 177–190, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  15. C. Kontovas and A. H. N. Psaraftis, “Reduction of emissions along the maritime inter modal container chain: operational models and policies,” Maritime Policy and Management, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 451–469, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. J. K. Woo and D. S. H. Moon, “The effects of slow steaming on the environmental performance in liner shipping,” in Maritime Policy and Management, pp. 1–16, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. M. Tull, “The environmental impact of ports: an Australian case study,” in Proceedings of the 14th International Economic History Congress, Helsinki, Finland, August 2006.
  18. N. A. Braathen, Ed., Environmental Impacts of International Shipping: the Role of Ports, OECD Publishing, Paris, France, 2011.
  19. OECD, Environmental Impacts of International Shipping: A Case Study of the Port of Vancouver, OECD Publishing, Paris, France, 2009.
  20. D. Bailey and G. Solomon, “Pollution prevention at ports: clearing the air,” Environmental Impact Assessment Review, vol. 24, no. 7-8, pp. 749–774, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. M. Klopott, “Restructuring of environmental management in Baltic ports: case of Poland,” Maritime Policy and Management, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 439–450, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  22. W. Homsomba, T. L. Yip, H. Yang, and X. Fu, “Regional cooperation and management of port pollution,” Maritime Policy and Management, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 451–466, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  23. Y. T. Chang, “Environmental efficiency of ports: a data envelopment analysis approach,” Maritime Policy and Management, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 467–478, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  24. R. H. Chiu and I. C. Lai, “Green port measures: empirical case in Taiwan,” in Proceedings of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, vol. 8, pp. 1–15, The Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, Jeju, Republic of Korea, June 2011.
  25. T. L. Saaty, “A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures,” vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 234–281, 1977. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  26. T. L. Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill International Book, New York, NY, USA, 1980. View at MathSciNet
  27. C.-C. Chou and K.-W. Yu, “Application of a new hybrid fuzzy AHP model to the location choice,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2013, Article ID 592138, 12 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  28. G. Kabir and M. A. A. Hasin, “Comparative analysis of AHP and fuzzy AHP models for multicriteria inventory classification,” International Journal of Fuzzy Logic Systems, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–16.
  29. S. H. Ghodsypour and C. O'Brien, “A decision support system for supplier selection using an integrated analytic hierarchy process and linear programming,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 56-57, pp. 199–212, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. L. A. Zadeh, “Fuzzy sets,” Information and Computation, vol. 8, pp. 338–353, 1965. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  31. J. J. Buckley, “Fuzzy hierarchical analysis,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 233–247, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  32. A. Kaufmann and M. M. Gupta, Introduction to Fuzzy Arithmetic, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, NY, USA, 1991. View at MathSciNet
  33. C. K. Kwong and H. Bai, “A fuzzy AHP approach to the determination of importance weights of customer requirements in quality function deployment,” Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 367–377, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. L. C. Leung and D. Cao, “On consistency and ranking of alternatives in fuzzy AHP,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 124, no. 1, pp. 102–113, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. F. Tahriri, M. R. Osman, A. Ali, R. M. Yusuff, and A. Esfandiary, “AHP approach for supplier evaluation and selection in a steel manufacturing company,” Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 54–76, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  36. JOC, “Port news: The JOC Top 50 World Container Ports,” 2013, http://www.joc.com/port-news/joc-top-50-world-container-ports_20130815.html.
  37. T. L. Saaty and L. G. Vargas, The Analytic Hierarchy Process, vol. 7, Mcgraw-Hill, Ellsworth Avenue Pittsburgh, Pa, USA, 1994.
  38. T. L. Saaty and L. G. Vargas, Models, Methods, Concepts and Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston Mass, USA, 2000.
  39. L. A. Zadeh, “The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning. I,” vol. 8, pp. 199–249, 1975. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  40. S. T. Lu, S. H. Yu, D. S. Chang, and S. C. Su, “Using the Fuzzy Linguistic preference relation approach for assessing the importance of risk factors in a software development project,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2013, Article ID 376375, 9 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  41. OECD, “Interim Report of the Green Growth Strategy: Implementing our commitment for a sustainable future,” 2010, http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/42/46/45312720.pdf.