Research Article
Moving Object Detection and Shadow Removing under Changing Illumination Condition
Table 1
Comparison of moving object detection with different methods.
| Methods
| Campus | Intelligent room | Hallway | Highway I | (%) | (%) | Avg | (%) | (%) | Avg | (%) | (%) | Avg | (%) | (%) | Avg |
| chrMask | 74.84 | 38.59 | 56.72 | 95.84 | 67.56 | 81.70 | 95.81 | 82.44 | 89.14 | 77.65 | 68.38 | 73.01 | geoMask | 76.78 | 85.96 | 81.36 | 57.35 | 73.87 | 65.61 | 50.68 | 77.81 | 64.24 | 65.34 | 74.15 | 69.74 | lrTexMask | 41.31 | 99.18 | 70.24 | 81.97 | 96.75 | 89.36 | 97.13 | 97.01 | 97.07 | 60.21 | 93.94 | 77.07 | phyMask | 71.41 | 30.60 | 51.00 | 77.96 | 85.95 | 81.95 | 85.82 | 86.89 | 86.35 | 48.15 | 79.47 | 63.81 | srTexMask | 64.6 | 91.13 | 77.86 | 93.12 | 56.64 | 74.88 | 98.40 | 67.15 | 82.77 | 14.79 | 94.87 | 54.82 | proposed | 67.97 | 88.68 | 78.32 | 91.70 | 95.36 | 93.53 | 96.26 | 97.47 | 96.86 | 74.59 | 66.82 | 70.71 |
|
|