Research Article
Evaluation and Satisfaction Survey on the Interface Usability of Online Publishing Software
Table 1
Users needed and main advantage for different usability methods.
| Method name | Users needed | Main advantages | Main disadvantages |
| Heuristic evaluation | None | Finding individual usability problems. Addressing expert user issues. | Not involving real users, so not finding “surprises” relating to their needs. |
| Performance measures | At least 10 | Hard numbers. Results easy to compare. | Not finding individual usability problems. |
| Thinking aloud | 3–5 | Pinpointing user misconceptions. Cheap test. | Unnatural for users. Hard for expert users to verbalize. |
| Observation | 3 or more | Ecological validity; revealing users’ real tasks. Suggesting functions and features. | Appointments hard to set up. No experimenter control. |
| Questionnaires | At least 30 | Finding subjective user preferences. Easy to repeat. | Pilot work needed (to prevent misunderstandings). |
| Interviews | 5 | Flexible, in-depth attitude, and experience probing. | Time consuming. Hard to analyze and compare. |
| Focus groups | 6–9 per group | Spontaneous reactions and group dynamics. | Hard to analyze. Low validity. |
| Logging actual use | At least 20 | Finding highly used (or unused) features. Running continuously. | Analysis programs needed for huge mass of data. Violation of users’ privacy. |
| User feedback | Hundreds | Tracking changes in user requirements and views. | Special organization needed to handle replies. |
|
|
Source: [1].
|