Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 875918, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/875918
Research Article

Cost-Sensitive Attribute Reduction in Decision-Theoretic Rough Set Models

1School of Information and Software Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, China
2School of Mathematics and Statistics, Minnan Normal University, Zhangzhou 363000, China
3School of Computer Science, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China

Received 23 October 2013; Revised 12 January 2014; Accepted 12 January 2014; Published 27 February 2014

Academic Editor: Matjaž Perc

Copyright © 2014 Shujiao Liao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. von Neumann and O. Morgenstern, Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 1944. View at MathSciNet
  2. D. Fudenberg and J. Tirole, Game Theory, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1991. View at MathSciNet
  3. M. Perc and A. Szolnoki, “Coevolutionary games—a mini review,” BioSystems, vol. 99, no. 2, pp. 109–125, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. Perc, J. G. Gómez-Gardeñes, A. Szolnoki, L. M. Floría, and Y. Moreno, “Evolutionary dynamics of group interactions on structured populations: a review,” Journal of the Royal Society Interface, vol. 10, no. 80, Article ID 20120997, 17 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. M. Perc and P. Grigolini, “Collective behavior and evolutionary games–-an introduction,” Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, vol. 56, pp. 1–5, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  6. A. Szolnoki, M. Perc, and G. Szabó, “Defense mechanisms of empathetic players in the spatial ultimatum game,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 109, Article ID 078701, 4 pages, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  7. A. Szolnoki, M. Perc, and G. Szabó, “Accuracy in strategy imitations promotes the evolution of fairness in the spatial ultimatum game,” Europhysics Letters, vol. 100, no. 2, Article ID 28005, 6 pages, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  8. Z. Pawlak, “Rough sets,” International Journal of Computer & Information Sciences, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 341–356, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  9. Z. Pawlak and A. Skowron, “Rough sets: some extensions,” Information Sciences, vol. 177, no. 1, pp. 28–40, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  10. Z. Pawlak and A. Skowron, “Rudiments of rough sets,” Information Sciences, vol. 177, no. 1, pp. 3–27, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  11. W. Ziarko, “Variable precision rough set model,” Journal of Computer and System Sciences, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 39–59, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  12. Y. Y. Yao, S. K. M. Wong, and P. Lingras, “A decision-theoretic rough set model,” in Methodologies for Intelligent Systems, 5 (Knoxville, TN, 1990), pp. 17–24, North-Holland, New York, NY, USA, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  13. Y. Y. Yao and S. K. M. Wong, “A decision theoretic framework for approximating concepts,” International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 793–809, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. S. Greco, B. Matarazzo, and R. Slowinski, “Rough set approach to decisions under risk,” in Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing (RSCTC '00), vol. 2005 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 160–169, 2001.
  15. S. Greco, B. Matarazzo, and R. Slowinski, “Rough sets theory for multicriteria decision analysis,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 129, no. 1, pp. 1–47, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. A. Skowron, S. Ramanna, and J. F. Peters, “Conflict analysis and information systems: a rough set approach,” Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Rough Sets and Knowledge Technology (RSKT '06), vol. 4062, pp. 233–240, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. Y. Yao and Y. Zhao, “Attribute reduction in decision-theoretic rough set models,” Information Sciences, vol. 178, no. 17, pp. 3356–3373, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  18. Y. Zhao, S. K. M. Wong, and Y. Yao, “A note on attribute reduction in the decision-theoretic rough set model,” in Transactions on Rough Sets XIII, vol. 6499 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 260–275, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. H. Li, X. Zhou, J. Zhao, and D. Liu, “Attribute reduction in decision-theoretic rough set model: a further investigation,” in Proceedings of 6th International Conference on Rough Sets and Knowledge Technology (RSKT '11), vol. 6954 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 466–475, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. X. Jia, W. Liao, Z. Tang, and L. Shang, “Minimum cost attribute reduction in decision-theoretic rough set models,” Information Sciences, vol. 219, pp. 151–167, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  21. F. Min and Q. Liu, “A hierarchical model for test-cost-sensitive decision systems,” Information Sciences, vol. 179, no. 14, pp. 2442–2452, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  22. F. Min, H. He, Y. Qian, and W. Zhu, “Test-cost-sensitive attribute reduction,” Information Sciences, vol. 181, no. 22, pp. 4928–4942, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. F. Min, Q. Hu, and W. Zhu, “Feature selection with test cost constraint,” International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol. 55, no. 1, part 2, pp. 167–179, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  24. S. Liao, J. Liu, F. Min, and W. Zhu, “Minimal-test-cost reduct problem on neighborhood decision systems,” Journal of Information and Computational Science, vol. 9, no. 14, pp. 4083–4098, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  25. F. Min and W. Zhu, “Attribute reduction of data with error ranges and test costs,” Information Sciences, vol. 211, pp. 48–67, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  26. H. Zhao, F. Min, and W. Zhu, “Test-cost-sensitive attribute reduction of data with normal distribution measurement errors,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2013, Article ID 946070, 12 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  27. F. Min, W. Zhu, H. Zhao, and G. Pan, “Coser: cost-senstive rough sets,” 2011, http://grc.fjzs.edu.cn/~fmin/coser/.
  28. C. L. Blake and C. J. Merz, “UCI repository of machine learning databases,” 1998, http://www.ics.uci.edu/~mlearn/mlrepository.html.
  29. H. Zhao, F. Min, and W. Zhu, “Cost-sensitive feature selection of numeric data with measurement errors,” Journal of Applied Mathematics, vol. 2013, Article ID 754698, 13 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. Y. Yao, “Three-way decisions with probabilistic rough sets,” Information Sciences, vol. 180, no. 3, pp. 341–353, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  31. Y. Yao, “The superiority of three-way decisions in probabilistic rough set models,” Information Sciences, vol. 181, no. 6, pp. 1080–1096, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus