Research Article  Open Access
The Finite Element Numerical Modelling of 3D Magnetotelluric
Abstract
The ideal numerical simulation of 3D magnetotelluric was restricted by the methodology complexity and the timeconsuming calculation. Boundary values, the variation of weighted residual equation, and the hexahedral mesh generation method of finite element are three major causes. A finite element method for 3D magnetotelluric numerical modeling is presented in this paper as a solution for the problem mentioned above. In this algorithm, a hexahedral element coefficient matrix for magnetoelluric finite method is developed, which solves largescale equations using preconditioned conjugate gradient of the firsttype boundary conditions. This algorithm is verified using the homogeneous model, and the positive landform model, as well as the low resistance anomaly model.
1. Introduction
Both 1D and 2D MT numerical simulation technologies have brought benefits to economy with their maturity. However, they are both the approximate processing of a 3D numerical simulation, which is the closest to the real geological body model [1–9].
With the development in computer science and computing technology, numerical simulation of 3D MT data has become the research focus. Shizhe [10] proposed the conjecture and theoretical basis of “Hexahedral mesh generation method for finite element” and “Boundary element method in 3D numerical simulation” [11]. However, there are only a few publications regarding successful scientific research on 3D numerical simulations [12–15]. The major difficulties lie in three aspects: insufficient computing capability due to limited CPU memory; immature parallel algorithm on multicore CPU’s; limited boundary element 3D MT numerical simulation on pure terrain uniform earth. Shu and Chen [16] proposed a 3D forward method in horizontal electric dipole under the magnetotelluric response by using a vector finite element method. After combining scalar finite elements and vector finite elements together, Mitsuhata and Uchida [17] conducted forward computation and error analysis for the two 3D COMMEMI models using formula, which verified the correctness of the program as well. Under the conditions of tetrahedral elements, Linping and Shikun [18] derived the analytical expression for the underground varying conductivity to calculate the threedimensional magnetotelluric finite element equation. Nam et al. [19] proposed the 3D magnetotelluric response simulation based on hexahedralvector finite element method and simulated the 3D terrain using isoparametric element method. As for the underground complex geological body, only a few papers are available from public sources [20–27].
This paper deduces the hexahedral element coefficient matrix of the magnetotelluric finite element method based on Xu Shizhe’s work. It uses preconditioned conjugate gradient method to solve largescale equations under the firsttype boundary conditions. This algorithm can significantly improve the computation efficiency. Via computing analysis of homogeneous model, undulating terrain model, and 3D model, the 3D low resistivity abnormal morphology can be clearly reflected. As the frequency decreases, the errors between the calculation results and analytical solutions are found gradually decreasing.
2. The Boundary Problem of 3D MT
A 3D geology space model is shown in Figure 1. The space is divided into two layers, air and underground, by an undulating (). The surface of ABCD is the infinite boundary of upper air which is about 100 km height, and the surface of EFGH is infinite boundary of underground which is about 30 km beneath ground. In addition, there are four infinite vertical boundary surfaces: ABFE, BFGC, DCGH and ADHE, all of which are about 30 km away from the center area of measurement.
The source of natural alternating electromagnetic field is located on the surface of ABCD. When the electromagnetic wave passes through the atmosphere and then enters the underground, the whole 3D geology space becomes the study field of MT method due to continuous electric field on the tangential direction and magnetic fields on the normal direction.
2.1. The Boundary Value Problem of MT Method
The electromagnetic waves from the magnetotelluric field source vertically incident into the underground as harmonic plane waves with a time harmonic factor . Maxwell coupled magnetotelluric field equations in frequency domain as where is the electric vector, is the magnetic vector, is angular frequency, is the medium permeability when the permeability of air is , is the medium conductivity or the reciprocal of medium resistivity, is the dielectric medium constant, and the dielectric constant of air is F/m.
Curling both sides of the electric equations (1), the differential electric equation can be obtained as follows: where
The equations of electric and magnetic have the same form that can be written in one unification equation. Substituting and for yields
The vector can be rewritten to the vector form with three components: where, , , and are the unit vectors in the directions of , , and .
2.1.1. When It Is Working in TE Model
(a)In the surface of ABCD shown in Figure 1, the field source is the electric vector . As the ratio of electric and magnetic, has no impact to the final result. Therefore, can be either zero or nonzero value. Here . and are all zero as well since there are no components of in and directions.(b)In the four vertical boundaries shown in Figure 1, the propagation direction of EM wave in magnetic field is vertical downward, being perpendicular to normal direction of the boundary, which is . Therefore, equals zero.(c)In the surface of EFGH in Figure 1, the underground can be assumed as a homogenous medium with a consideration that this surface is beyond the study area. The electromagnetic field attenuates in a normal way, which follows the index law during downward propagation. The vector has no value in directions and . where is a constant factor with any nonzero value, , and is the homogenous conductivity below the infinite surface EFGH. Derivative of (6) is obtained as follows:
2.1.2. When It Is Working in TM Model
The field source is one component of the magnetic vector . When magnetic field passes through the atmosphere, attenuation barely happens. Therefore, the boundary conditions of ABCD can be replaced by s in the TE model.
3. The Variation Problem of Weighted Residual Equation
Both sides of (4) are multiplied by and integrated on the whole region, showing the result as follows: where
According to the vector identities
Equation (8) will be
In which,
According to the boundary condition(a)in the surfaces ABCD and , due to fixed in these surfaces;(b)in the four infinite vertical surfaces, , because the reflection of the anomalous field can be ignored. Then the electric field and have one component only;(c)in the surface EFGH, .
Substituting all the boundary conditions in (12) yields
4. Hexahedral Mesh Generation
Hexahedral element mesh is used to make Figure 1 into a 3D geology space as shown in Figure 2. Obviously, the entire space of 3D geology is meshed into the amount of hexahedral elements.
The vertices of each hexahedral element are sorted as shown in Figure 3.
5. Unit Analysis
Using the finite element method to solve differential equations requires a mesh representation of the target area, such as the widely used hexahedral mesh. Figure 4(a) is the parent element of the hexahedron and Figure 4(b) is the subelement. The coordinate correspondences between them are where , , and is the center coordinate of sub element; , , is the lengths of three edges. The differential relations between them are
(a)
(b)
The shape function is defined as where , , are the coordinates of vertex in the parent unit.
The interpolation function is where , , , . Therefore where , , and are the variations of , , and .
6. The Form of Unit Coefficient Matrix
The regional integral of (13) can be decomposed into the integral of each unit:
In one unit where Substituting (20) into the first integral of (19) where Its matrix form is
The expressions of the elements in each matrix are listed as where
Substituting (18) into the second integral of (19): where
When the boundary surface unit 1234 is in the boundary surface EFGH, the boundary integral is where where , are the shape functions of quadrilateral plane element rather than the shape functions of hexahedral plane element. Its form is shown in the following:
Substituting (14) into (22) and (27), (31) into (29), respectively, each element of the matrix can then be calculated.
7. The Integration of the Coefficient Matrix
Integrating all the hexahedral elements obtained above gives the integration of the coefficient matrix which is shown below:
The arbitrary is not always zero, which gives the following largescale equations: where is the coefficient matrix and is the unknown variables.
8. The Computation of Apparent Resistivity
The expansions of (2) in the Cartesian coordinate system are presented below:
When , , and of each vertex have been obtained, , , and can be computed from the approximate values of each vertex’s differential quotient using the difference method. Therefore, the apparent resistivity equation is derived as:
9. Example Analysis
9.1. Homogeneous Model
Figure 5 shows a homogeneous model: the resistivity is ; the grid size is m^{2}; the dot pitch is 1000 m; the line spacing is 1000 m. The measuring frequency is 1000 Hz, 500 Hz, 100 Hz, and 50 Hz, and the observation points are the five points of the midline (2000 m, 3000 m, 4000 m, 5000 m, and 6000 m).
Table 1 lists the numerical computation results. According to the results, the average of the relative error is 2.81% in 1000 Hz and 0.16% in 100 Hz. Gradually decreasing relative error is observed as the frequency decreases.

9.2. Positive Landform Model
In Figure 6, a positive landform model has a resistivity of and the topographic fall is 60 m; the grid size is m^{2}; the dot pitch is 1000 m; and the line spacing is 1000 m. The measuring frequencies are 1000 Hz and 100 Hz, and the observation points are the nine points on the midline.
Results of the numerical computation are shown in Figure 7. The highest value is the pseudoabnormality in the positive landform. The distortion error is 39.5% at 1000 Hz and 12.8% at 100 Hz. With a decreasing frequency, the effect of topographic distortion decreases gradually.
9.3. The Model with Low Resistance Body
Figure 8 shows a model containing a low resistance body with resistivity; resistivity of the rest of the model is . The horizontal geometry of the anomalous body is ; upper surface is 250 m away from the ground and its height is 750 m; the grid size is m^{2}; the dot pitch is 1000 m; the line spacing is 1000 m (Figure 9). The measuring frequencies are 1000 Hz and 100 Hz, and the observation points are the nine points of the midline.
(a)
(b)
The result of numerical computation is shown in Figure 10 with the curves showing low resistivity abnormality at both 1000 Hz and 100 Hz.
10. Conclusions and Recommendations
During the research of magnetotelluric finite element numerical simulation algorithm, the boundary values of 3D magnetotelluric numerical simulations are analyzed; the preconditioned conjugate gradient is adopted for solving largescale equations under the firsttype boundary conditions; the stability and the iterative convergence speed are ensured in 3D magnetotelluric forward calculations. This paper provides an effective tool for theoretical studies on distribution and characteristics of magnetotelluric field response of a 3D geology structure. Meanwhile, it also has established critical foundation for future 3D inversion algorithm research.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge the great support from the National Key Scientific Instrument and Equipment Development Special Project “3D Frequency Domain Electromagnetic Signal Processing and Inversion Imaging Interpretation System (no. 2011YQ05006007)” and the Key Laboratory of Earth Exploration and Information Technology of Ministry of education in Chengdu University of Technology.
References
 I. d'Erceville and G. Kunetz, “The effect of a fault on the Earths natural electromagnetic field,” Geophysics, vol. 27, pp. 651–665, 1962. View at: Google Scholar
 E. Haber, U. M. Ascher, D. A. Aruliah, and D. W. Oldenburg, “Fast simulation of 3D electromagnetic problems using potentials,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 163, no. 1, pp. 150–171, 2000. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. L. Mackie, T. R. Madden, and P. E. Wannamaker, “Threedimensional magnetotelluric modeling using difference equations—theory and comparisons to integral equation solutions,” Geophysics, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 215–226, 1993. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. L. Mackie and T. R. Madden, “Conjugate direction relaxation solutions for 3D magnetotelluric modeling,” Geophysics, vol. 58, no. 7, pp. 1052–1057, 1993. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. T. Smith, “Conservative modeling of 3D electromagnetic fields, part I: properties and error analysis,” Geophysics, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 1308–1318, 1996. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. C. Ting and G. W. Hohmann, “Integral equation modeling of threedimensional magnetotelluric response,” Geophysics, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 182–197, 1981. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 P. E. Wannamaker, G. W. Hohmann, and W. A. Sanfilipo, “Electromagnetic modeling of threedimensional bodies in layered earths using integral equations,” Geophysics, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 60–74, 1984. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Z. Xiong, “Electromagnetic magnetotelluric modeling of 3D structures by the method of system iteration using integral equations,” Geophysics, vol. 57, no. 11, pp. 1556–1561, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
 M. S. Zhdanov and V. V. Spichak, Mathematical Modeling of Electromagnetic Fields in ThreeDimensional Inhomogeneous Media, Nauka Publishing House, Moscow, Russia, 1992.
 X. Shizhe, The Infinite Element Methods in Geophysics, Science Press, Beijing, China, 1994.
 X. Shizhe, R. Baiyao, Zhouhui et al., “3D terrain effects on magnetotelluric (MT) numerical simulations,” Science in China D, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 15–20, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
 C. Xiaobin, Z. Guoze, and M. Xiao, “Research on inversion of MT 3D modal approximately by 1D, 2D inversion method,” Chinese Journal of Engneering Geophysics, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 9–15, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
 H. Zuzhi and H. Xiangyun, “Review of threedimensional magnetotelluric inversion methods,” Progress in Geophysics, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 214–220, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
 B. Ruan, S. Xu, and Z. Xu, “Modeling the 3D terrain effect on MT by the boundary element method,” Earth Science—Journal of China University of Geosciences, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 130–134, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
 T. Handong, T. Tuo, L. Changhong et al., “Magnetotelluric threeDimensional modeling using the staggeredgrid finite difference method,” Chinese Journal of Geophysics, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 705–711, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
 Y. Shu and M. Chen, “Finite element solution of 3D geoelectric models in frequency magnetotelluric sounding excited by a horizontal electric dipole,” Coal Geology & Exploration, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 50–56, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
 Y. Mitsuhata and T. Uchida, “3D magnetotelluric modeling using the TΩ finiteelement method,” Geophysics, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 108–119, 2004. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. Linping and D. Shikun, “Finite element calculation method of 3D magnetotelluric field under complex condition,” Journal of China University of Geosciences, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 775–779, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
 M. J. Nam, H. J. Kim, Y. Song, T. J. Lee, J. Son, and J. H. Suh, “3D magnetotelluric modelling including surface topography,” Geophysical Prospecting, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 277–287, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 F. I. Zyserman and J. E. Santos, “Parallel finite element algorithm with domain decomposition for threedimensional magnetotelluric modelling,” Journal of Applied Geophysics, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 337–351, 2000. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. Yoshimura and N. Oshiman, “Edgebased finite element approach to the simulation of geoelectromagnetic induction in a 3D sphere,” Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 1039–1045, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
 T. Mogi, “Threedimensional modeling of magnetotelluric data using finite element method,” Journal of Applied Geophysics, vol. 35, no. 23, pp. 185–189, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
 H. A. van der Vorst, “BICGSTAB: a fast and smoothly converging variant of BICG for the solution of nonsymmetric linear systems,” SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 631–644, 1992. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 M. Lifeng, W. Xuben, and G. Yongcai, “The probability tomography results of MT and the improved methods,” Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 612–616, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
 X. Shi, J. Wang, S. Zhang, and X. Hu, “Multiscale genetic algorithm and its application in magnetotelluric sounding data inversion,” Chinese Journal of Geophysics, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 122–130, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
 W. Song, “Threedimensional Fourier transformation migration method of magnetotelluric data and its application,” Journal of the University of Petroleum China, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 21–25, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
 W. Wei, Y. Peng, and C. Liping, “Magnetoelectrotelluric full frequency segment migration imaging technique and its application,” Small Hydrocarbon Reservisions, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 25–28, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 Ligang Cao and Yun Liu. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.