Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2014, Article ID 903056, 13 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/903056
Research Article

Adopting De Novo Programming Approach on IC Design Service Firms Resources Integration

Department of Business Administration, Asia University, No. 500, Lioufeng Road, Wufeng, Taichung 41354, Taiwan

Received 28 September 2013; Revised 23 December 2013; Accepted 23 December 2013; Published 18 February 2014

Academic Editor: Ching-Ter Chang

Copyright © 2014 James K. C. Chen. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. Varadarajan, “Outsourcing: think more expansively,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 62, no. 11, pp. 1165–1172, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. G. Forgionne and Z. Guo, “Internal supply chain coordination in the electric utility industry,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 196, no. 2, pp. 619–627, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. R. George and R. Kabir, “Business groups and profit redistribution: a boon or bane for firms?” Journal of Business Research, vol. 61, no. 9, pp. 1004–1014, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. L. Duckstein and S. Opricovic, “Multiobjective optimization in river basin development,” Water Resources Research, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 14–20, 1980. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. Zeleny, “A case study in multiple objective design: De Novo programming,” in Multiple Criteria Analysis, Operational Methods, vol. 1, pp. 37–52, 1981. View at Google Scholar
  6. M. Zeleny, “Optimal system design with multiple criteria: De Novo programming approach,” Engineering Costs and Production Economics, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 89–94, 1986. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. S. Christophersona, M. Kitsonb, and J. Michiec, “Innovation, networks and knowledge exchange,” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 165–173, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. H. W. Chesbrough, Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Mass, USA, 2003.
  9. J. B. Barney, “Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage,” Advances in Strategic Management, vol. 17, pp. 203–227, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. B. Wernerfelt, “A resource-based view of the firm,” Strategic Management Journal, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 171–180, 1984. View at Google Scholar
  11. T. R. Holcomb and M. A. Hitt, “Toward a model of strategic outsourcing,” Journal of Operations Management, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 464–481, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. D. J. Collis, “A resource-based analysis of global competition: the case of the bearings industry,” Strategic Management Journal, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 49–68, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  13. E. Penrose, The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1959.
  14. E. Anderson and H. Gatignon, “Modes of foreign entry: a transaction cost analysis and propositions,” Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 1–26, 1986. View at Google Scholar
  15. J. Chimhanzi and R. E. Morgan, “Explanations from the marketing/human resources dyad for marketing strategy implementation effectiveness in service firms,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 787–796, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. J. Fahy, “A resource-based analysis of sustainable competitive advantage in a global environment,” International Business Review, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 57–78, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. M. A. Harrison, R. E. Hoskisson, and D. Ireland, “Synergies and post acquisition performance: differences versus similarities in resource allocations,” Journal of Management, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 173–190, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  18. D. J. Teece, G. Pisano, and A. Shuen, “Dynamic capabilities and strategic management,” Strategic Management Journal, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 509–533, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. V. A. Varma, J. F. Pekny, G. E. Blau, and G. V. Reklaitis, “A framework for addressing stochastic and combinatorial aspects of scheduling and resource allocation in pharmaceutical R&D pipelines,” Computers and Chemical Engineering, vol. 32, no. 4-5, pp. 1000–1015, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. R. Kolisch, “Efficient priority rules for the resource-constrained project scheduling problem,” Journal of Operations Management, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 179–192, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. R. Kolisch and S. Hartmann, “Experimental investigation of heuristics for resource-constrained project scheduling: an update,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 174, no. 1, pp. 23–37, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. M. J. Leiblein, “The choice of organizational governance form and performance: predictions from transaction cost, resource-based, and real options theories,” Journal of Management, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 937–961, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. G. C. Moore and I. Benbasat, “Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation,” Information Systems Research, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 192–222, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. R. E. Hoskisson, M. A. Hitt, W. P. Wan, and D. Yiu, “Theory and research in strategic management: swings of a pendulum,” Journal of Management, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 417–456, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. C. C. Miller and L. B. Cardinal, “Strategic planning and firm performance: a synthesis of more than two decades of research,” Academy of Management Journal, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 1649–1665, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  26. S. D. Hunt, A General Theory of Competition, Sage, Thousand Oaks, Calif, USA, 2000.
  27. S. Hart and C. Banbury, “How strategy-making processes can make a difference,” Strategic Management Journal, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 251–269, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  28. E. Drakopoulos, “Enterprise network planning and design: methodology and application,” Computer Communications, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 340–352, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. V. Kumar, B. Maheshwari, and U. Kumar, “ERP systems implementation: best practices in Canadian government organizations,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 147–172, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. W. R. Lewis, “Strategic planning,” Hospital Materiel Management Quarterly, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 57–63, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. D. Wainwright and T. Waring, “Three domains for implementing integrated information systems: redressing the balance between technology, strategic and organisational analysis,” International Journal of Information Management, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 329–346, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. M. Zeleny, “Optimal system design with multiple criteria: De Novo programming approach,” Engineering Costs and Production Economics, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 89–95, 1986. View at Google Scholar
  33. M. Zeleny, “Optimal given system versus designing optimal system: the De Novo programming approach,” International Journal of General System, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 295–307, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  34. Y. M. Zhang, G. H. Huang, and X. D. Zhang, “Inexact de Novo programming for water resources systems planning,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 199, no. 2, pp. 531–541, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  35. M. Zeleny, “Trade-offs free management via De Novo programming,” International Journal Operations and Quantitative Management, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 3–13, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  36. H. Chesbrough, W. Anhaverbeke, and J. West, Eds., Open innovation: Researching a New Paradigm, Oxford University Press, 2006.
  37. J. West and S. Gallagher, “Challenges of open innovation: the paradox of firm investment in open-source software,” R & D Management, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 319–331, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. E. H. Kessler, P. E. Bierly, and S. Gopalakrishnan, “Internal versus external learning in new product development: effects on speed, costs and competitive advantage,” R & D Management, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 213–223, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. O. Gassmann and E. Enkel, “Towards a theory of open innovation: three core process archetypes,” in Proceedings of the R&D Management Conference (RADMA '04), Lisbon, Portugal, 2004.
  40. L. V. Kantorovich and T. C. Koopmans, Problems of Application of Optimization Methods in Industry, Federation of Swedish Industry, 1976.
  41. T. K. Das and B.-S. Teng, “A resource-based theory of strategic alliances,” Journal of Management, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 31–61, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. Z. Babic and I. Pavic, “Multicriterial production planning by De Novo programming approach,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 59–66, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. J. K. C. Chen and G. H. Tzeng, “Perspective strategic alliance and resource allocation in supply chain systems through the De Novo programming approach,” International Journal Sustainable Strategic Management, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 320–339, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  44. J.-J. Huang, G.-H. Tzeng, and C.-S. Ong, “Motivation and resource-allocation for strategic alliances through the De Novo perspective,” Mathematical and Computer Modelling, vol. 41, no. 6-7, pp. 711–721, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  45. J.-J. Huang, G.-H. Tzeng, and C.-S. Ong, “Choosing best alliance partners and allocating optimal alliance resources using the fuzzy multi-objective dummy programming model,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 57, no. 10, pp. 1216–1223, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. R. M. Grant, “The resource-based theory competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation,” California Management Review, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 114–135, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  47. K. A. Artto and K. Wikström, “What is project business?” International Journal of Project Management, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 343–353, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. J. Söderlund, “On the broadening scope of the research on projects: a review and a model for analysis,” International Journal of Project Management, vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 655–667, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. B. Cova, P. Ghauri, and R. Salle, Project Marketing, Beyond Competitive Bidding, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, 2002.
  50. T. Mandjàk and Z. Veres, “The D-U-C model and the stages of the project marketing process,” in Proceedings of the 14th IMP Annual Conference Proceedings, H. K. Nummela, Ed., pp. 471–490, 1998.
  51. Q. Meng, Y. Huang, and R. L. Cheu, “Competitive facility location on decentralized supply chains,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 196, no. 2, pp. 487–499, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  52. H.-M. Hsu and W.-P. Wang, “Dynamic programming for delayed product differentiation,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 156, no. 1, pp. 183–193, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet