Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2014, Article ID 954040, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/954040
Research Article

Pairwise Comparison and Distance Measure of Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets

1Department of Tourism and MICE, Chung Hua University, Hsinchu 30012, Taiwan
2Luoyang Electronic Equipment Test Center, Luoyang, Henan 471003, China

Received 10 April 2014; Accepted 3 July 2014; Published 4 August 2014

Academic Editor: Ker-Wei Yu

Copyright © 2014 Han-Chen Huang and Xiaojun Yang. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. L. A. Zadeh, “Fuzzy sets,” Information and Control, vol. 8, pp. 338–353, 1965. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  2. M. Mizumoto and K. Tanaka, “Some properties of fuzzy sets of type 2,” Information and Control, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 312–340, 1976. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  3. J. M. Mendel and R. I. B. John, “Type-2 fuzzy sets made simple,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 117–127, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. M. Mendel and H. Wu, “Type-2 fuzzistics for symmetric interval type-2 fuzzy sets: part 1, forward problems,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 781–792, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. D. Dubois and H. Prade, Fuzzy Sets and Systems: Theory and Applications, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1980. View at MathSciNet
  6. K. T. Atanassov, “Intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 87–96, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  7. K. T. Atanassov, “More on intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 37–45, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  8. K. T. Atanassov and G. Gargov, “Interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 343–349, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  9. W. Gau and D. J. Buehrer, “Vague sets,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 610–614, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  10. H. Bustince and P. Burillo, “Vague sets are intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 403–405, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  11. R. R. Yager, “On the theory of bags,” International Journal of General Systems, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 23–37, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  12. S. Miyamoto, “Remarks on basics of fuzzy sets and fuzzy multisets,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 156, no. 3, pp. 427–431, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  13. J. M. Garibaldi, M. Jaroszewski, and S. Musikasuwan, “Nonstationary fuzzy sets,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 1072–1086, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. D. Li, J. Han, X. Shi, and M. C. Chan, “Knowledge representation and discovery based on linguistic atoms,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 431–440, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. D. Li, C. Liu, and W. Gan, “A new cognitive model: cloud model,” International Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 357–375, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. X. Yang, L. Zeng, F. Luo, and S. Wang, “Cloud hierarchical analysis,” Journal of Information & Computational Science, vol. 7, no. 12, pp. 2468–2477, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. X. Yang, L. Zeng, and R. Zhang, “Cloud Delphi method,” International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowlege-Based Systems, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 77–97, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. X. Yang, L. Yan, and L. Zeng, “How to handle uncertainties in AHP: the Cloud Delphi hierarchical analysis,” Information Sciences, vol. 222, pp. 384–404, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  19. V. Torra, “Hesitant fuzzy sets,” International Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 529–539, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  20. V. Torra and Y. Narukawa, “On hesitant fuzzy sets and decision,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, pp. 1378–1382, Jeju Island, Korea, August 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. L. A. Zadeh, “The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning—I,” Information Sciences, vol. 3, pp. 199–249, 1975. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  22. L. A. Zadeh, “The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning—II,” Information Sciences, vol. 4, pp. 301–357, 1975. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  23. L. A. Zadeh, “The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning—III,” Information Sciences, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 43–80, 1975. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  24. J. Ma, D. Ruan, Y. Xu, and G. Zhang, “A fuzzy-set approach to treat determinacy and consistency of linguistic terms in multi-criteria decision making,” International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 165–181, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  25. G. Bordogna and G. Pasi, “A fuzzy linguistic approach generalizing boolean information retrieval: a model and its evaluation,” Journal of the American Society for Information Science, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 70–82, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  26. G. Bordogna and G. Pasi, “An ordinal information retrieval model,” International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 9, supplement 1, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  27. J. Kacprzyk and S. Zadrozny, “Linguistic database summaries and their protoforms: towards natural language based knowledge discovery tools,” Information Sciences, vol. 173, no. 4, pp. 281–304, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  28. E. Herrera-Viedma and A. G. López-Herrera, “A model of an information retrieval system with unbalanced fuzzy linguistic information,” International Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 1197–1214, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  29. H. Ishibuchi, T. Nakashima, and M. Nii, Classification and Modeling with Linguistic Information Granules: Advanced Approaches to Linguistic Data Mining, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2004.
  30. R. Degani and G. Bortolan, “The problem of linguistic approximation in clinical decision making,” International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 143–162, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. E. Sanchez, “Truth-qualification and fuzzy relations in natural languages, application to medical diagnosis,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 155–167, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  32. H. Lee, “Applying fuzzy set theory to evaluate the rate of aggregative risk in software development,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 323–336, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. L. Martínez, “Sensory evaluation based on linguistic decision analysis,” International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 148–164, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. L. Martínez, J. Liu, D. Ruan, and J. Yang, “Dealing with heterogeneous information in engineering evaluation processes,” Information Sciences, vol. 177, no. 7, pp. 1533–1542, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. J. Lu, Y. Zhu, X. Zeng, L. Koehl, J. Ma, and G. Zhang, “A linguistic multi-criteria group decision support system for fabric hand evaluation,” Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 395–413, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  36. R. de Andrés, M. Espinilla, and L. Martínez, “An extended hierarchical linguistic model for managing integral evaluation,” International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 486–500, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. D. Wu and J. M. Mendel, “Computing with words for hierarchical decision making applied to evaluating a weapon system,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 441–460, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. F. Herrera and E. Herrera-Viedma, “Choice functions and mechanisms for linguistic preference relations,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 120, no. 1, pp. 144–161, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  39. F. Herrera, E. Herrera-Viedma, and L. Martínez, “A fusion approach for managing multi-granularity linguistic term sets in decision making,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 114, no. 1, pp. 43–58, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  40. F. Herrera and L. Martínez, “A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 746–752, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  41. B. Arfi, “Fuzzy decision making in politics: a linguistic fuzzy-set approach,” Political Analysis, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 23–56, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. V. Huynh and Y. Nakamori, “A satisfactory-oriented approach to multiexpert decision-making with linguistic assessments,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics B: Cybernetics, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 184–196, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. D. Ben-Arieh and Z. Chen, “Linguistic group decision-making: opinion aggregation and measures of consensus,” Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 371–386, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  44. J. L. García-Lapresta, “A general class of simple majority decision rules based on linguistic opinions,” Information Sciences, vol. 176, no. 4, pp. 352–365, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  45. J. Wang and J. Hao, “Fuzzy linguistic PERT,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 133–144, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. T. C. Wang and Y. H. Chen, “Applying fuzzy linguistic preference relations to the improvement of consistency of fuzzy AHP,” Information Sciences, vol. 178, no. 19, pp. 3755–3765, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  47. Y. Dong, Y. Xu, and S. Yu, “Linguistic multiperson decision making based on the use of multiple preference relations,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 160, no. 5, pp. 603–623, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  48. P. D. Liu, “A novel method for hybrid multiple attribute decision making,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 388–391, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. Y. Dong, W. Hong, Y. Xu, and S. Yu, “Selecting the individual numerical scale and prioritization method in the analytic hierarchy process: a 2-Tuple fuzzy linguistic approach,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 13–25, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. L. A. Zadeh, “Fuzzy logic = computing with words,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 103–111, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. J. M. Mendel, “Fuzzy sets for words: a new beginning,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International conference on Fuzzy Systems, pp. 37–42, St. Louis, Mo, USA, May 2003. View at Scopus
  52. J. M. Mendel, “Computing with words and its relationships with fuzzistics,” Information Sciences, vol. 177, no. 4, pp. 988–1006, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  53. F. Liu and J. M. Mendel, “Encoding words into interval type-2 fuzzy sets using an interval approach,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 1503–1521, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. S. Coupland, J. M. Mendel, and D. Wu, “Enhanced interval approach for encoding words into interval type-2 fuzzy sets and convergence of the word FOUs,” in Proceedings of the 6th IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence (WCCI '10), pp. 1–8, Barcelona, Spain, July 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. L. Martínez and F. Herrera, “An overview on the 2-tuple linguistic model for computing with words in decision making: extensions, applications and challenges,” Information Sciences, vol. 207, pp. 1–18, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  56. R. M. Rodriguez, L. Martinez, and F. Herrera, “Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets for decision making,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 109–119, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. E. Szmidt and J. Kacprzyk, “Distances between intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 114, no. 3, pp. 505–518, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  58. P. Grzegorzewski, “Distances between intuitionistic fuzzy sets and/or interval-valued fuzzy sets based on the Hausdorff metric,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 148, no. 2, pp. 319–328, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  59. W. Wang and X. Xin, “Distance measure between intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” Pattern Recognition Letters, vol. 26, no. 13, pp. 2063–2069, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. Z. S. Xu and J. Chen, “An overview of distance and similarity measures of intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 529–555, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  61. Z. S. Xu, “A method based on distance measure for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making,” Information Sciences, vol. 180, no. 1, pp. 181–190, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. Z. Xu and M. Xia, “Distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy sets,” Information Sciences, vol. 181, no. 11, pp. 2128–2138, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  63. Z. Xu and M. Xia, “On distance and correlation measures of hesitant fuzzy information,” International Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 410–425, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  64. Z. S. Xu, “Deviation measures of linguistic preference relations in group decision making,” Omega, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 249–254, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. Y. Xu and H. Wang, “Distance measure for linguistic decision making,” Systems Engineering Procedia, vol. 1, pp. 450–456, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  66. Y. M. Wang, J. B. Yang, and D. L. Xu, “A preference aggregation method through the estimation of utility intervals,” Computers and Operations Research, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 2027–2049, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  67. H. Liao, Z. Xu, and X. Zeng, “Distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and their application in multi-criteria decision making,” Information Sciences, vol. 271, pp. 125–142, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  68. B. Zhu, Z. Xu, and M. Xia, “Hesitant fuzzy geometric Bonferroni means,” Information Sciences, vol. 205, pp. 72–85, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  69. M. Xia and Z. Xu, “Hesitant fuzzy information aggregation in decision making,” International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 395–407, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  70. X. Gu, Y. Wang, and B. Yang, “A method for hesitant fuzzy multiple attribute decision making and its application to risk investment,” Journal of Convergence Information Technology, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 282–287, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. M. Xia, Z. Xu, and N. Chen, “Some hesitant fuzzy aggregation operators with their application in group decision making,” Group Decision and Negotiation, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 259–279, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. G. Wei, “Hesitant fuzzy prioritized operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 31, pp. 176–182, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. B. Zhu, Z. Xu, and M. Xia, “Dual hesitant fuzzy sets,” Journal of Applied Mathematics, vol. 2012, Article ID 879629, 13 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus