Research Article

Storage Space Allocation of Inbound Container in Railway Container Terminal

Table 5

Comparison between OA and RAA in 7 days.

Planning periodOur approach (OA)Random allocation algorithm (RAA)GAP1GAP2
Imbalance amountsOverlapping amountsImbalance amountsOverlapping amounts

1327957.1%77.8%
278111436.4%42.9%
31114182138.9%33.3%
4810131738.5%41.2%
5215460.0%75.0%
61311172523.5%56.0%
71613221927.3%31.6%
8118141121.4%27.3%
900000.0%0.0%
103351140.0%72.7%
11159191721.1%47.1%
12137151513.3%53.3%
135011354.5%100.0%
1493171147.1%72.7%
151315242745.8%44.4%
16711192463.2%54.2%
17309466.7%100.0%
184681150.0%45.5%
191114151926.7%26.3%
2097211957.1%63.2%
21103266.7%100.0%
2265131353.8%61.5%
231917272629.6%34.6%
2494131630.8%75.0%
2500000.0%0.0%
2611519942.1%44.4%
271810222318.2%56.5%
28127181533.3%53.3%

Notes: GAP1 = (imbalance amounts obtained from RAA − imbalance amounts obtained from OA) * 100/imbalance amounts obtained from RAA.
GAP2 = (overlapping amounts obtained from RAA − overlapping amounts obtained from OA) * 100/overlapping amounts obtained from RAA.