Research Article
Comparison of Two Quantitative Analysis Techniques to Predict the Evaluation of Product Form Design
Table 5
Performance evaluation of MLR prediction models.
| | Mean | Prediction | ER (EI/9) | Mean | Prediction | ER (EI/9) |
| |
Rakish |
Family | 1 | 5.23 | 5.10 | 12.8% | 7.70 | 6.59 | 17.6% | 2 | 2.77 | 2.88 | 12.8% | 6.33 | 5.81 | 15.0% | 3 | 5.23 | 4.99 | 17.1% | 7.57 | 7.20 | 11.1% | 4 | 2.33 | 2.49 | 14.3% | 8.43 | 8.49 | 8.0% | 5 | 1.77 | 4.56 | 31.9% | 6.23 | 6.56 | 13.6% | 6 | 6.80 | 7.08 | 13.3% | 6.37 | 5.97 | 14.6% | | Average ER = 17.03% | Average ER = 13.32% |
| |
Formal |
Classical | 1 | 4.33 | 5.07 | 21.0% | 3.40 | 4.91 | 22.0% | 2 | 6.63 | 5.42 | 21.6% | 5.53 | 5.72 | 13.2% | 3 | 5.10 | 5.01 | 14.2% | 4.53 | 5.77 | 23.6% | 4 | 6.47 | 6.41 | 15.4% | 5.40 | 4.74 | 18.0% | 5 | 4.73 | 3.27 | 22.4% | 3.20 | 3.95 | 12.1% | 6 | 3.47 | 4.89 | 20.5% | 4.93 | 5.29 | 20.1% | | Average ER = 19.18% | Average ER = 18.17% |
| |
Elegant |
Modern | 1 | 4.50 | 4.24 | 18.1% | 4.93 | 4.14 | 18.7% | 2 | 8.10 | 6.63 | 19.0% | 3.97 | 4.10 | 20.2% | 3 | 7.70 | 6.59 | 17.6% | 5.23 | 4.84 | 16.5% | 4 | 5.17 | 7.29 | 27.1% | 4.60 | 3.91 | 21.0% | 5 | 4.93 | 4.85 | 14.9% | 4.63 | 6.25 | 24.9% | 6 | 4.57 | 5.00 | 14.2% | 5.47 | 6.39 | 22.1% | | Average ER = 18.48% | Average ER = 20.57% |
|
|