Research Article
Comparison of Two Quantitative Analysis Techniques to Predict the Evaluation of Product Form Design
Table 6
Performance evaluation of NN prediction model.
| | Mean | Prediction | ER (EI/9) | Mean | Prediction | ER (EI/9) |
| |
Rakish |
Rakish | 1 | 5.23 | 5.71 | 13.8% | 7.70 | 8.18 | 13.6% | 2 | 2.77 | 3.73 | 16.5% | 6.33 | 6.52 | 14.0% | 3 | 5.23 | 4.17 | 20.8% | 7.57 | 6.89 | 12.7% | 4 | 2.33 | 4.12 | 24.4% | 8.43 | 7.84 | 10.3% | 5 | 1.77 | 3.02 | 16.2% | 6.23 | 6.84 | 14.7% | 6 | 6.80 | 5.72 | 20.4% | 6.37 | 6.88 | 15.0% | | Average ER = 16.30% | Average ER = 13.38% |
| |
Rakish |
Rakish | 1 | 4.33 | 5.13 | 21.3% | 3.40 | 5.07 | 23.4% | 2 | 6.63 | 5.97 | 18.4% | 5.53 | 5.12 | 13.8% | 3 | 5.10 | 5.37 | 14.5% | 4.53 | 6.33 | 27.7% | 4 | 6.47 | 5.97 | 16.3% | 5.40 | 6.11 | 18.2% | 5 | 4.73 | 4.37 | 15.9% | 3.20 | 3.72 | 12.4% | 6 | 3.47 | 5.03 | 21.7% | 4.93 | 5.18 | 19.8% | | Average ER = 18.02% | Average ER = 19.22% |
| |
Rakish |
Rakish | 1 | 4.50 | 4.23 | 18.1% | 4.93 | 4.53 | 17.1% | 2 | 8.10 | 6.99 | 15.6% | 3.97 | 4.44 | 20.9% | 3 | 7.70 | 8.02 | 13.1% | 5.23 | 4.58 | 17.5% | 4 | 5.17 | 7.66 | 30.8% | 4.60 | 4.03 | 20.6% | 5 | 4.93 | 5.67 | 17.0% | 4.63 | 5.03 | 17.9% | 6 | 4.57 | 4.81 | 13.6% | 5.47 | 5.12 | 20.0% | | Average ER = 18.03% | Average ER = 19.00% |
|
|