Research Article
Deep Extreme Learning Machine and Its Application in EEG Classification
Table 2
Performance comparison of DELM with ELM, KELM, and MLELM on UCI datasets.
| Dataset | Algorithm | # | Training accuracy | Testing accuracy | Training time (s) | Testing time (s) |
| Ionosphere | Basic ELM | Average | 0.9207 ± 0.0151 | 0.9342 ± 0.0222 | 0.0044 ± 0.0074 | 0.0013 ± 0.0048 | Best | 0.9500 | 0.9735 | — | — | KELM | — | 0.9900 | 0.9735 | 0.0064 | 0.0017 | ML-ELM | Average | 0.9112 ± 0.0159 | 0.9447 ± 0.0216 | 0.0115 ± 0.0116 | 0.0014 ± 0.0050 | Best | 0.9500 | 0.9801 | — | — | DELM | Average | 0.9503 ± 0.0111 | 0.9474 ± 0.0292 | 0.0164 ± 0.0079 | 0.0045 ± 0.0064 | Best | 0.9750 | 0.9934 | — | — |
| Diabetes | Basic ELM | Average | 0.7983 ± 0.0062 | 0.7725 ± 0.0129 | 0.0072 ± 0.0132 | 0.0034 ± 0.0098 | Best | 0.8125 | 0.8021 | — | — | KELM | — | 0.7899 | 0.7917 | 0.6818 | 0.0314 | ML-ELM | Average | 0.7666 ± 0.0207 | 0.7522 ± 0.0324 | 0.0091 ± 0.0143 | 0.0044 ± 0.0109 | Best | 0.7951 | 0.8177 | — | — | DELM | Average | 0.7871 ± 0.0079 | 0.7580 ± 0.0422 | 0.0641 ± 0.0143 | 0.0112 ± 0.0086 | Best | 0.8038 | 0.8229 | | |
|
|