Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2015, Article ID 183705, 12 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/183705
Research Article

A Thrust Allocation Method for Efficient Dynamic Positioning of a Semisubmersible Drilling Rig Based on the Hybrid Optimization Algorithm

1Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea
2Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Research Institute of Marine System Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea

Received 7 April 2015; Revised 3 August 2015; Accepted 5 August 2015

Academic Editor: Chunlin Chen

Copyright © 2015 Luman Zhao and Myung-Il Roh. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. J. Sørensen, “A survey of dynamic positioning control systems,” Annual Reviews in Control, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 123–136, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. T. A. Johansen and T. I. Fossen, “Control allocation—a survey,” Automatica, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 1087–1103, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. C. Y. Duan, S. J. Zhang, Y. F. Zhao, and X. R. Kong, “Robust control allocation among overactuated spacecraft thrusters under ellipsoidal uncertainty,” Abstract and Applied Analysis, vol. 2014, Article ID 950127, 12 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. O. Härkegård, “Dynamic control allocation using constrained quadratic programming,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 1028–1034, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. C. D. Wit, Optimal thrust allocation methods for dynamic positioning of ships [M.S. thesis], Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands, 2009.
  6. C. C. Liang and W. H. Cheng, “The optimum control of thruster system for dynamically positioned vessels,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 97–110, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. T. A. Johansen, T. I. Fossen, and S. P. Berge, “Constrained nonlinear control allocation with singularity avoidance using sequential quadratic programming,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 211–216, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. Y. Parikshit, Analysis, design and optimization of offshore power system network [Ph.D. thesis], National University of Singapore, Singapore, 2013.
  9. D.-W. Zhao, F.-G. Ding, J.-F. Tan, Y.-Q. Liu, and X.-Q. Bian, “Optimal thrust allocation based GA for dynamic positioning ship,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation (ICMA '10), pp. 1254–1258, Xi’an, China, August 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. K.-Y. Lee, S. Cho, and M.-I. Roh, “An efficient global-local hybrid optimization method using design sensitivity analysis,” International Journal of Vehicle Design, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 300–317, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. M. Bernitsas, D. Ray, and P. Kinley, “KT, KQ, and efficiency curves for the Wageningen B-series propellers,” Tech. Rep., University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich, USA, 1981. View at Google Scholar
  12. D. T. Brown and L. Ekstrom, “Vessel thruster-thruster interactions during azimuthing operations,” in Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, pp. 991–996, Halkidiki, Greece, June 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. D. E. Goldberg, Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass, USA, 1989.
  14. L. Davis, Handbook of Genetic Algorithms, Van Nostrand-Reinhold, 1991.
  15. J. S. Arora, Introduction to Optimum Design, Elsevier, 3rd edition, 2012.
  16. G. Vanderplaats, Numerical Optimization Techniques for Engineering Design, McGraw-Hill, 1984.
  17. C. Stork and T. Kusuma, “Hybrid genetic autostatics: new approach for large-amplitude statics with noisy data,” in Proceedings of the 62nd Anniversary International Meeting, pp. 1127–1131, The Society of Exploration Geophysicists, New Orleans, La, USA, 1992.
  18. M. J. Porsani, P. L. Stoffa, M. K. Sen, R. K. Chunduru, and W. T. Wood, “A combined genetic and linear inversion algorithm for waveform inversion,” in Proceedings of the 63rd Anniversary International Meeting, pp. 692–695, The Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Washington, DC, USA, 1993.
  19. K. Albarado, R. Hartfield, W. Hurston, and R. Jenkins, “Solid rocket motor design using hybrid optimization,” International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, vol. 2012, Article ID 987402, 9 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. E. Deniz Ülker, A. Haydar, and K. Dimililer, “Application of hybrid optimization algorithm in the synthesis of linear antenna array,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2014, Article ID 686730, 7 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. F.-Z. Oujebbour, A. Habbal, R. Ellaia, and Z. Zhao, “Multicriteria shape design of a sheet contour in stamping,” Journal of Computational Design and Engineering, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 187–193, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. H. Willi and S. Klaus, Test Examples for Nonlinear Programming Codes, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1981.
  23. J. J. Grefenstette, “Optimization of control parameters for genetic algorithms,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 122–128, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus