Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 190463, 12 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/190463
Research Article

Finite-Dimensional Hybrid Observer for Delayed Impulsive Model of Testosterone Regulation

1Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg 198504, Russia
2Information Technology, Uppsala University, 75105 Uppsala, Sweden

Received 4 June 2015; Revised 19 October 2015; Accepted 20 October 2015

Academic Editor: Yan-Wu Wang

Copyright © 2015 Diana Yamalova et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. S. L. Lightman and B. L. Conway-Campbell, “The crucial role of pulsatile activity of the HPA axis for continuous dynamic equilibration,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 710–718, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. J. D. Veldhuis, “Recent insights into neuroendocrine mechanisms of aging of the human male hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis,” Journal of Andrology, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. A. Churilov, A. Medvedev, and A. Shepeljavyi, “Mathematical model of non-basal testosterone regulation in the male by pulse modulated feedback,” Automatica, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 78–85, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  4. P. Mattsson and A. Medvedev, “Modeling of testosterone regulation by pulse-modulated feedback: an experimental data study,” in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Computational Models for Life Sciences (CMLS '13), vol. 1559, pp. 333–342, AIP Publishing, Sydney, Australia, November 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. B. C. Goodwin, “Oscillatory behavior in enzymatic control processes,” in Advances of Enzime Regulation, G. Weber, Ed., vol. 3, pp. 425–438, Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK, 1965. View at Google Scholar
  6. B. C. Goodwin, “An entrainment model for timed enzyme syntheses in bacteria,” Nature, vol. 209, no. 5022, pp. 479–481, 1966. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. S. Griffith, “Mathematics of cellular control processes I. Negative feedback to one gene,” Journal of Theoretical Biology, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 202–208, 1968. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. W. R. Smith, “Hypothalamic regulation of pituitary secretion of luteinizing hormone-II Feedback control of gonadotropin secretion,” Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 57–78, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. D. V. Efimov and A. L. Fradkov, “Oscillatority conditions for nonlinear systems with delay,” Journal of Applied Mathematics, vol. 2007, Article ID 72561, 12 pages, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  10. W. M. Haddad, V. Chellaboina, and S. G. Nersesov, Impulsive and Hybrid Dynamical Systems: Stability, Dissipativity, and Control, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  11. V. Lakshmikantham, D. D. Bainov, and P. S. Simeonov, Theory of Impulsive Differential Equations, World Scientific, Singapore, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  12. A. M. Samoilenko and N. A. Perestyuk, Impulsive Differential Equations, World Scientific Publishing Company, Singapore, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  13. T. Yang, Impulsive Control Theory, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 2001. View at MathSciNet
  14. I. Stamova, Stability Analysis of Impulsive Functional Differential Equations, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, Germany, 2009.
  15. W. S. Evans, L. S. Farhy, and M. L. Johnson, “Biomathematical modeling of pulsatile hormone secretion: a historical perspective,” in Methods in Enzymology: Computer methods, Volume A, M. L. Johnson and L. Brand, Eds., vol. 454, pp. 345–366, Elsevier, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  16. A. Churilov, A. Medvedev, and P. Mattsson, “Periodical solutions in a time-delay model of endocrine regulation by pulse-modulated feedback,” in Proceedings of the 51st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 362–367, Maui, Hawaii, USA, December 2012.
  17. A. Churilov, A. Medvedev, and P. Mattsson, “Finite-dimensional reducibility of time-delay systems under pulse-modulated feedback,” in Proceedings of the 52nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC '13), pp. 2078–2083, Florence, Italy, December 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. J. J. Walker, J. R. Terry, K. Tsaneva-Atanasova, S. P. Armstrong, C. A. McArdle, and S. L. Lightman, “Encoding and decoding mechanisms of pulsatile hormone secretion,” Journal of Neuroendocrinology, vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 1226–1238, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. W. R. Smith, “Qualitative mathematical models of endocrine systems,” American Journal of Physiology—Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, vol. 245, no. 4, pp. R473–R477, 1983. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. M. Cartwright and M. Husain, “A model for the control of testosterone secretion,” Journal of Theoretical Biology, vol. 123, no. 2, pp. 239–250, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. P. Das, A. B. Roy, and A. Das, “Stability and oscillations of a negative feedback delay model for the control of testosterone secretion,” BioSystems, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 61–69, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. D. M. Keenan and J. D. Veldhuis, “A biomathematical model of time-delayed feedback in the human male hypothalamic-pituitary-Leydig cell axis,” American Journal of Physiology—Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 275, no. 1, pp. E157–E176, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. S. Ruan and J. Wei, “On the zeros of a third degree exponential polynomial with applications to a delayed model for the control of testosterone secretion,” IMA Journal of Mathemathics Applied in Medicine and Biology, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 41–52, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. B. Mukhopadhyay and R. Bhattacharyya, “A delayed mathematical model for testosterone secretion with feedback control mechanism,” International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences, vol. 2004, no. 3, pp. 105–115, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  25. H. Ren, “Stability analysis of a simplified model for the control of testosterone secretion,” Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems B. A Journal Bridging Mathematics and Sciences, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 729–738, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  26. A. R. Teel, “Observer-based hybrid feedback: a local separation principle,” in Proceedings of the American Control Conference (ACC '10), pp. 898–903, Baltimore, Md, USA, July 2010. View at Scopus
  27. N. Cox, L. Marconi, and A. Teel, “High-gain observers and linear output regulation for hybrid exosystems,” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 1043–1063, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  28. A. Alessandri and P. Coletta, “Design of luenberger observers for a class of hybrid linear systems,” in Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control: 4th International Workshop, HSCC 2001 Rome, Italy, March 28–30, 2001 Proceedings, vol. 2034 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 7–18, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. M. L. Johnson, L. Pipes, P. P. Veldhuis et al., “AutoDecon: a robust numerical method for the quantification of pulsatile events,” in Methods in Enzymology: Computer Methods, Volume A, M. L. Johnson and L. Brand, Eds., vol. 454, pp. 367–404, Elsevier, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  30. J. D. Veldhuis, D. M. Keenan, and S. M. Pincus, “Motivations and methods for analyzing pulsatile hormone secretion,” Endocrine Reviews, vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 823–864, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. A. Churilov, A. Medvedev, and A. Shepeljavyi, “A state observer for continuous oscillating systems under intrinsic pulse-modulated feedback,” Automatica, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 1117–1122, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  32. D. Yamalova, A. Churilov, and A. Medvedev, “Hybrid state observer with modulated correction for periodic systems under intrinsic impulsive feedback,” in Proceedings of the 5th IFAC International Workshop on Periodic Control Systems (PSYCO '13), pp. 119–124, Caen, France, July 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. D. Yamalova, A. Churilov, and A. Medvedev, “Hybrid state observer for time-delay systems under intrinsic impulsive feedback,” in Proceedings of the 21st International Symposium on Mathematical Theory of Networks and Systems (MTNS '14), pp. 977–984, Groningen, The Netherlands, July 2014.
  34. T. Raff and F. Allgöwer, “An impulsive observer that estimates the exact state of a linear continuous-time system in predetermined finite time,” in Proceedings of the Mediterranean Conference on Control & Automation (MED '07), pp. 1–3, IEEE, Athens, Greece, July 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. T. Raff and F. Allgower, “Observers with impulsive dynamical behavior for linear and nonlinear continuous-time systems,” in Proceedings of the 46th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC '07), pp. 4287–4292, New Orleans, La, USA, December 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. W.-H. Chen, D.-X. Li, and X. Lu, “Impulsive observers with variable update intervals for lipschitz nonlinear time-delay systems,” International Journal of Systems Science, vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 1934–1947, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  37. W.-H. Chen, W. Yang, and W. X. Zheng, “Adaptive impulsive observers for nonlinear systems: revisited,” Automatica, vol. 61, pp. 232–240, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  38. D. Yamalova, A. Churilov, and A. Medvedev, “State estimation in a delayed impulsive model of testosterone regulation by a finite-dimensional hybrid observer,” in Proceedings of the 14th European Control Conference (ECC '15), pp. 1444–1449, Linz, Austria, July 2015.
  39. D. M. Fargue, “Réducibilité des systèmes héréditaires a des systèmes dynamiques,” Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences, Paris, Série B, vol. 277, pp. 471–473, 1973. View at Google Scholar
  40. D. M. Fargue, “Reductibilite des systemes hereditaires,” International Journal of Non linear Mechanics, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 331–338, 1974. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  41. J. D. Murray, Mathematical Biology. I. An Introduction, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 3rd edition, 2002. View at MathSciNet