Research Article  Open Access
Performance Analysis of the Multiband Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing UltraWideband Systems for Multipath Fading and Multiuser Interference Channels
Abstract
This paper presents the performance analysis of the multiband orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (MBOFDM) ultrawideband (UWB) systems for multipath fading and multiuser interference channels. A closed form approximation of the BER performance of the MBOFDM UWB system with multiple interferences is proposed. Based on the derived approximation, the effects on the BER performance for the choice of the codeword constraint lengths of the convolutional encoder, the length of the cyclic prefix, and the multiuser environments of two or more interferers are thoroughly discussed. Four UWB multipath fading channels are also investigated for the BER performance of the MBOFDM UWB system. The simulated results provide us with useful information to appropriately choose the parameters of the MBOFDM UWB system for the sake of achieving the BER performance that conforms to requirement of the FCC standards.
1. Introduction
Ultrawideband (UWB) technology [1–4], operated in frequencies between 3.1 GHz and 10.6 GHz, is an emerging short distance, high bandwidth, and high data rate wireless communication system. The general design approach for UWB wireless system includes the narrow timedomain pulsed, pulsed multiband, and multiple band orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (MBOFDM) [5–7] modulation. According to previous literatures [8–11], the main disadvantage of the narrow timedomain pulsed UWB system is the high complexity of the RF circuits that capture the significant multipath energy [12–14]. The pulsed multiband UWB system also has the same difficulty in its RF chain design. However, the MBOFDM UWB system has several advantages, including the ability to efficiently capture multipath energy, the insensitivity to group delay variations, the ability to deal with narrowband interferers, and the fewer requirements of the bandtiming switching [15, 16]. The drawback of the MBOFDM UWB system is the high peaktoaverage power ratio (PAPR) of the transmitted signals. The MBOFDM UWB systems provide the data rates from 53.3 to 480 Mbit/s by utilizing different spreading gain factors and different schemes of the forward error correction (FEC) coding and timefrequency coding (TFC). The FEC coding with a convolutional code provides the code rates of 1/3, 11/32, 1/2, 5/8, and 3/4.
Multipath energy collection is the key factor of the robustness and range of the wireless communication systems. The cyclic prefix (CP) length of the OFDM system determines the received multipath energy and reduces the intercarrier interference (ICI) and intersymbol interference for multipath fading channels. However, the CP structure would lead to a serious ripple problem in the power spectral density (PSD) of the transmitted signals. The MBOFDM UWB systems use a zeropadded prefix (ZPP) instead of the CP to reduce the ripple problem of the PSD and extend the transmission range of the system.
The channel models specified in IEEE 802.15.3a standard [17, 18] were based upon SalehValenzuela (SV) model [19], which was characterized by the cluster arrival rate, ray arrival rate within clusters, and cluster and ray decay factors. The gain coefficients of these channel models are assumed to be Rayleigh distributed. The performances of MBOFDM UWB and DSUWB systems are evaluated in [20]. A general framework for the performance analysis of MBOFDM UWB system is provided in [21]. All of these works are based on the assumption of perfect frequency and timing synchronization. In addition, the cyclic prefix of OFDM system is assumed to be longer than the channel multipath delays. Hence, the systems would not suffer from the ISI and ICI. Since the multiuser interference would significantly affect the performance of the MBOFDM UWB system, it is not appropriate to simply consider the multiuser interference as AWGN. In this paper, the multiuser interferences are modeled as a summation of flat Rayleighfading and unsynchronized OFDM signals.
In this paper, we propose an analytical model and a closed form BER performance equation of the MBOFDM UWB systems with multiuser interferences for LOS and NLOS multipath fading channels. The effects on the BER performance for the choice of the codeword constraint lengths (CCL) of the convolutional encoder, the length of the cyclic prefix, and the multiuser environments of two or more interferers are thoroughly discussed. Four UWB multipath fading channels are also investigated for the BER performance of the MBOFDM UWB system. The simulated results give us valuable information to obtain the BER performance that conforms to requirement of the FCC standards by appropriately choosing the parameters of the MBOFDM UWB systems.
2. System Model and BER Analysis
Figure 1 shows the block diagram of the MBOFDM UWB system. In this system, the convolutional coded QPSK/QAMOFDM based modulation is combined with a multibanding approach, which divides the spectrum into several subbands. Each subband has 528 MHz bandwidth. The transmitted OFDM symbols are timeinterleaved and across the subbands by using a predefined timefrequency code. Various information data rates can be achieved by puncturing the convolutional encoder. The transmitted signal of shown in Figure 1 can be expressed as [22–24]where is the energy per coded bit, is the symbol duration, is the total number of OFDM subcarriers, and is the coded data transmitted at the th subcarrier. The transmitted interference signal from the th MBOFDM interferer can be described aswhere is the energy per interference bit, is the transmitted coded data of the th interference user at the th subcarrier, and . All the interferences are assumed to be synchronized during the theoretical analysis. And later we will show that the performance would be almost the same when the interferences are unsynchronized.
Based on the above description, the received signal can be expressed aswhere is the index of the MBOFDM interference, is the total number of interferences, is the received signal at the th subcarrier, and denotes the complex white Gaussian noise, whose doublesided PSD is Watt/Hz. We denote by the channel impulse response between the MBOFDM transmitter and the MBOFDM receiver and the channel impulse response between the th interference and the MBOFDM receiver. These channels are assumed to be slow fading Rayleigh channels, which means these channels could be considered constant over the symbol interval, but would vary from symbol to symbol. The multipath channels are independent of each other and the channel phase correction is assumed to be perfect. Based on Lampe's paper [8], UWB channel can be approximated as Rayleigh fading channel [11]. Hence, the channel responses could be modeled aswhere the channel gains and at any given frequency are Rayleigh distributed and the channel phases and are uniformly distributed between 0 and . Hence, the frequency response at the th subcarrier, , is obtained as where is the channel frequency response at frequency . Substituting (5) into (3), we obtain the received signal at the th subcarrierIn a similar way, the channel frequency response at th subcarrier between the th interference and the MBOFDM receiver can be represented asThe received interference caused by the th interference, hence, can be expressed as
The received signal after OFDM demodulation and phase compensation can be written in the form [25]where is the multiuser interference term, , and represents the noise term, which has the same statistical characteristic as . Since the channel is static during the symbol interval, we can assume that the ICI of the OFDM is zero. Note that the phases and in (5) and (8) are modeled as random variables uniformly distributed between 0 and . It is easy to prove that is also a random variable uniformly distributed between 0 and .
To simplify the derivation of the probability of error for the MBOFDM UWB system, the linearity property of the convolutional codes is used. That is, we assume that the allzero sequence is transmitted and we determine the probability of error in deciding in favor of another sequence. Note that and . The input to the Viterbi decoder can be expressed aswhere is the real white noise, whose doublesided PSD is . The probability of error in the pairwise comparison of the metrics for path 0 (the allzero path) and path 1 (a path differs by bits interval) is
In order to simplify the derivation process, we introduce the random variables X and Y defined asOwing to the large bandwidth of the MBOFDM system and the interleaving used to this system, all and could be considered independent from each other over the bits interval. From the central limit theorem, the random variables and can be approximated as Gaussian random variables with means and variances given byHence, the probability of error in (11) can be reduced towhere . This equation gives us an approximation on the expected probability of deciding in favor of a path of Hamming distance d from the transmitted allzero path. An approximation on the BER of the MBOFDM UWB system then can be calculated aswhere is the code rate for the MBOFDM UWB system, is the minimum free distance of the convolutional code used, and is the distance spectra of the code. SINR denotes signal to interference plus noise ratio, which is defined as Note that the BER performance of the MBOFDM UWB system can be easily computed by substituting the particular SINR into (15). This relatively simple formula could give us good insights into the performance of the MBOFDM systems in practical channels with multiple interferences.
3. Simulation and Discussion
Since the system model in Figure 1 includes multiuser interferers (some other MBOFDM UWB signals), multipath fading channels, and Viterbi convolution encoder/decoder for various information data rates, the system model is too complicated and timeconsuming to perform computer simulation. According to the derivation in Section 2, we know that it is relatively simple for us to evaluate the BER performance of MBOFDM UWB systems by substituting the particular SINR into (15). Based on this method, we perform some simulation to investigate the effects on the BER performance of MBOFDM UWB system for the choice of the CCL of the convolutional encoder, the length of the cyclic prefix, and the multiuser environments of two or more interferers.
The parameters of the simulated MBOFDM systems are summarized in Table 1 [5]. Four SalehValenzuela (SV) channel models, CM1~CM4, are used in our BER performance simulations. According to the documents provided by the IEEE 802.15.3a group, the parameters of these simulation channels are listed in Table 2 [17, 18]. Among these channel models, CM1 model is based on lineofsight (LOS) measurements and CM2~CM4 are based on nonLOS (NLOS) measurements. By using the simulation parameters listed in Tables 1 and 2, we could easily calculate values of , , and , that is, the transmitting energy per coded bit, the energy per interference bit, and the doublesided PSD of white Gaussian noise, respectively. The transmitting power of each interferer is assumed to be the same in our simulations.


3.1. The Effect of the CCL of the Convolutional Encoder
In the multiuser environments, since users adopt the different timefrequency code (TFC), the bandwidth of the transmitting signals will not be overlap. We assume the transmitting power and data rate are the same among the multiple users and the transmitted signals are synchronous. The value of the SINR depends on the transmitting power of interference users, the distance between interferer and receiver, and the distance between transmitter and receiver. In general, the package error rate (PER) of the wireless communication systems should be lower than 8% to comply with FCC regulations. This PER corresponds to the bit error rate (BER) of 8.1424 10^{−5} (10^{−4.09}) in the MBOFDM UWB systems. Figures 2 and 3 show the effects of the different CCL of the convolutional code used in the MBOFDM UWB systems. From Figure 2, we can see that BER conforms to the requirement of the FCC regulations under the condition of and dB for the MBOFDM UWB system with data rate of 110 Mbit/s. If the data rate of the MBOFDM UWB system increases up to 480 Mbit/s, the system needs and dB to conform to the BER requirement of the FCC regulations, as shown in Figure 3. The BER of the system would be decreased if the longer length of the CCL is used, due to the longer buffer space of convolutional encoder, at the cost of more complexities of the encoding/decoding circuits of the convolutional code. Therefore, we need carefully to choose the CCL for the MBOFDM UWB systems.
3.2. The Received Multipath Energy for Multipath Fading Channels
Four SV channel models, CM1~CM4, are used in our BER performance simulations. The more the receiver length is, the more the energy of fading paths is collected at the receiver. For the MBOFDM UWB systems, the length of cyclic prefix determines the energy level of the paths collected at the receiver. Figure 4 shows the curves of received multipath energy versus the length of the cyclic prefix for four SV channel models. From Figure 4, we can see that if the receiver length is set to 10 nsec, the received multipath energy can reach 100%, 97%, 84%, and 63% for CM1, CM2, CM3, and CM4, respectively. Figure 5 shows the BER performance for different levels of received multipath energy in the cases of CCL = 7 and the data rate of 110 Mbit/s. As shown in Figure 5, the MBOFDM UWB system with the received multipath energy of 60% reaches the BER of 10^{−4.09} at the SINR = 9 dB. Figure 6 shows the BER performance for different levels of received multipath energy in the cases of CCL = 7 and the data rate of 480 Mbit/s. From this figure, we can see that all the curves do not satisfy the BER requirement of the FCC regulations. Therefore, the level of multipath energy collection should be carefully chosen according to the channel conditions of the MBOFDM UWB system.
3.3. Multiuser Interference Environment: Two Users, One Receiver and One Interferer
Figure 7 shows the relative positions of the multiuser environments for two users. User_{0} is assumed to be the receiver of interest and user_{1} is interferer. The distance between the user_{0} and user_{1} is . The average received interference power of user_{0} from the interferer decays as a power law of the distance of . Hence, the equation of SINR could be changed to [25]where is the path loss exponent, which typically ranges from 2 to 4 in wireless communication systems. From the channel model used in our analysis, is assumed to be 1.7 for LOS channels and for NLOS channels. The BER performances for different distances of and in the MBOFDM UWB systems with data rates of 110 and 480 Mbit/s are shown in Figures 8 and 9, respectively. As shown in Figure 8, we can see that the BER performance is less than 10^{−4.09}, which is conformed to FCC standards, for m in the systems with the data rate of 110 Mbit/s and CCL = 7. However, as shown in Figure 9, the MBOFDM UWB systems with data rate of 480 Mbit/s and CCL = 7 have the best BER performance of about 10^{−3} for m and m in NLOS channels. In this situation, the MBOFDM UWB system would not be able to comply with FCC standards.
3.4. Multiuser Interference Environment: Two Users, One Receiver and Nine Interferers
Figure 10 shows the relative positions of the multiuser environments for ten users. We assume these users are located on the halfcircle with the radius of . User_{0} is assumed to be the receiver of interest and the other users are interferers. The propagation distances between user_{0} and interferers are denoted by , respectively. m is set for the simulations of the MBOFDM UWB system with the data rate of 110 Mbit/s and CCL = 7. Figure 11 shows the BER performance of the MBOFDM UWB system versus the number of the interference sources for LOS and NLOS channels. The distances of are increased incrementally with the value of 0.1 m.
From Figure 11, we can see that, for the transmitting distance m and LOS channels, the MBOFDM UWB system conforms to the BER performance requirement of the FCC standard with a maximum number of interference sources of 5. In NLOS channels, the MBOFDM UWB system could conform to the FCC BER performance requirement for 9 interference sources and m. The BER performance of the MBOFDM UWB system with data rate of 480 Mbit/s and CCL = 7 is shown in Figure 12. In this simulation, the distance of is chosen to be 0.5 m according to the simulation results of the twouser case as shown in Figure 9. From this figure, we can see that, for NLOS channels, the BER performance of the MBOFDM UWB system would be almost the same, as the number of interference sources is increased. However, for LOS channels, the BER performance of the MBOFDM UWB system would increase, as the number of interference sources is increased. The MBOFDM UWB systems with the data rate of 480 Mbit/s and CCL = 7 have the best BER performance of about 10^{−3} for NLOS channels.
4. Conclusion
The formula of the BER performance of the MBOFDM UWB systems with multiuser interferences is proposed for LOS and NLOS multipath fading channels. We have discussed the effects on the BER performance for the choice of the CCL of the convolutional encoder, the length of the cyclic prefix, and the multiuser environments of two or more interferers. From the simulation results, we can see that the longer CCL would cause better BER performance of the MBOFDM UWB systems, however, at the cost of more complexities of the encoding/decoding circuits. It also could be noted from these simulation results that the higher data rates would increase the BER of the MBOFDM UWB system. Four UWB multipath fading channels and the choice of the cyclic prefix have been investigated for the BER performance of the MBOFDM UWB system. The simulated results demonstrate that we can obtain the BER performance that conforms to the requirements of the FCC standards by appropriately choosing the length of the cyclic prefix of the system. The BER performances for the multiuser environments with LOS and NLOS channels are also investigated in this paper. These simulation results provide us with useful information for choosing the parameters of the MBOFDM UWB system for multiuser interference and multipath fading channels.
Disclosure
The authors have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interests; and expert testimony or patentlicensing arrangements) or nonfinancial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge, or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this paper.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.
Authors’ Contribution
All authors participated in the data analysis and/or interpretation. Yuan Ouyang and ChuanChih Liu contributed to the conception and design of study. WenPiao Lin and ChuanChih Liu contributed to the acquisition of data (laboratory or clinical). Yuan Ouyang and WenPiao Lin drafted the paper, made critical revision, and approved the final version of the paper.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge the support of the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) of the Republic of China under Grants NSC 1022221E182065MY3, NSC 1012221E182048MY2, and MOST 1032221E182013. The authors also wish to acknowledge the facilities and financial support from High Speed Intelligent Communication (HSIC) Research Center in Chang Gung University, Taiwan.
References
 High Rate Ultra Wideband PHY and MAC Standard, ECMA Standard 368, 3rd edition, 2008.
 K. Siwiak and D. McKeown, UltraWideband Radio Technology, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 2004. View at: Publisher Site
 A. Mehbodniya and S. Aïssa, “Ultra wideband technologies coexistence in Nakagamim fading channels,” IET Communications, vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 1081–1088, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Ghildiyal, B. Godara, K. Amara, R. Dalmolin, and A. Amara, “UWB for low power, short range, inbody medical implants,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Wireless Information Technology and Systems (ICWITS '10), pp. 1–4, IEEE, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, September 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 P. Gupta and D. K. Mehra, “Kalman filterbased channel estimation and ICI suppression for highmobility OFDM systems,” International Journal of Communication Systems, vol. 21, no. 10, pp. 1075–1090, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 E. Saberinia, J. Tang, A. H. Tewfik, and K. K. Parhi, “PulsedOFDM modulation for ultrawideband communications,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 720–726, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 IEEE802.15 Task Group 3a, “Multiband OFDM physical layer proposal for wireless personal area networks,” Doc. no. P802.1503/268r3, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
 L. Lampe, A. Nasri, and R. Schober, “Interference from MBOFDM UWB systems: exact, approximate, and asymptotic analysis,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on UltraWideband (ICUWB '06), pp. 261–267, September 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Mehbodniya and S. Aïssa, “Effects of MBOFDM system interference on the performance of DSUWB,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 58, no. 8, pp. 4665–4669, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H.Y. Chan, H.T. Li, C.W. Chao, and W.P. Lin, “Bidirectional MBOFDM ultrawideband WDM access networks using a time frequency code scheme,” in Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Electrical Engineering/Electronics, Computer, Telecommunications and Information Technology (ECTICON '09), vol. 2, pp. 980–982, Pattaya, Thailand, May 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. M. R. Islam and K. S. Kwak, “WinnerHopf interpolation aided kalman filterbased channel estimation for MBOFDM UWB systems in time varying dispersive fading channel,” in Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT '10), vol. 2, pp. 1184–1188, February 2010. View at: Google Scholar
 E. Manasseh, S. Ohno, and M. Nakamoto, “Preamble based channel and CFO estimation for MIMOOFDM systems with null subcarriers,” IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics, Communications and Computer Sciences, vol. 94, no. 11, pp. 2271–2278, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 D.H. Kim, K.M. Kang, and C. Lee, “A multiband OFDM ultrawideband SoC in 90 nm CMOS technology,” IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 1064–1070, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Z. Li, W. Zou, B. Li, Z. Zhou, and X. Huang, “Analysis on coexistence of ultra wideband with OFDMbased communication systems,” IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 823–830, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. M. S. Sadough, M. M. Ichir, P. Duhamel, and E. Jaffrot, “Waveletbased semiblind channel estimation for ultrawideband OFDM systems,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 1302–1314, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Z. Wang, Y. Xin, G. Mathew, and X. Wang, “A lowcomplexity and efficient channel estimator for multiband OFDMUWB systems,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 1355–1366, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Foester, “Channel modeling subcommittee report final,” IEEE 802.1502/490r1SG3, IEEE, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
 A. F. Molisch, J. R. Foerster, and M. Pendergrass, “Channel models for ultrawideband personal area networks,” IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 14–21, 2003. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. A. M. Saleh and R. A. Valenzuela, “A statistical model for indoor multipath propagation,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 128–137, 1987. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 O.S. Shin, S. S. Ghassemzadeh, L. J. Greenstein, and V. Tarokh, “Performance evaluation of MBOFDM and DSUWB systems for wireless personal area networks,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on UltraWideband (ICU '05), pp. 214–219, IEEE, September 2005. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 W. P. Siriwongpairat, W. Su, and K. J. R. Liu, “Performance characterization of multiband UWB communication systems using poisson cluster arriving fading paths,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 745–751, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 F. C. B. F. Müller, A. Klautau, and C. R. C. M. Da Silva, “Performance analysis of a multiband OFDM UWB system in the presence of narrowband interference,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (GLOBECOM '09), pp. 1–5, December 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. Kaneko and F. Maehara, “Theoretical derivation of bit error rate in MBOFDM UWB system,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Wireless Telecommunications Symposium (WTS '09), pp. 1–5, IEEE, Prague, Czech Republic, April 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Li, J. M. Rabaey, and A. SangiovanniVincentelli, “Analysis of interference effects in MBOFDM UWB systems,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC '08), pp. 165–170, April 2008. View at: Google Scholar
 G. Zeng, F. A. Cassara, and P. Voltz, “Probability of error for MBOFDM system in the presence of multipath fading and multiuser interference,” in Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT '07), vol. 3, pp. 2079–2084, GangwonDo, Republic of Korea, February 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 Yuan Ouyang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.