Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 197306, 11 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/197306
Research Article

Adaptive CGFs Based on Grammatical Evolution

College of Information System and Management, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China

Received 29 July 2015; Revised 23 November 2015; Accepted 26 November 2015

Academic Editor: Andrzej Swierniak

Copyright © 2015 Jian Yao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. NATO, “Human behavior representation in constructive simulation,” Tech. Rep. RTO-TR-HFM-128, NATO RTO, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  2. S. J. E. Taylor, A. Khan, K. L. Morse, A. Tolk, L. Yilmaz, and J. Zander, “Grand challenges on the theory of modeling and simulation,” in Proceedings of the Symposium on Theory of Modeling & Simulation—DEVS Integrative M&S Symposium (DEVS '13), p. 34, San Diego, Calif, USA, April 2013.
  3. S. Mittal, M. J. Doyle, and A. M. Portrey, “Human in the loop in System of Systems (SoS) modeling and simulation,” in Modeling and Simulation Support for System of Systems Engineering Applications, chapter 16, pp. 415–451, John Wiley & Sons, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  4. S. Mittal, M. J. Doyle, and E. Watz, “Detecting intelligent agent behavior with environment abstraction in complex air combat systems,” in Proceedings of the 7th Annual IEEE International Systems Conference (SysCon '13), pp. 662–670, IEEE, Orlando, Fla, USA, April 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. O'Neill and C. Ryan, Grammatical Evolution, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2003.
  6. M. Mitchell, An Introduction to Genetic Algorithms, MIT press, 1998.
  7. A. Champandard, “Behavior trees for next-gen game AI,” in Proceedings of the Game Developers Conference (GDC '07), Audio Lecture, December 2007.
  8. I. Millington and J. Funge, Artificial Intelligence for Games, CRC Press, 2012.
  9. Teledyne Brown Engineering Incorporated, EADSIM Executive Summary, Teledyne Brown Engineering Incorporated, 2012.
  10. R. Kerchner, “The TAC BRAWLER air combat simulation analyst manual (rev. 3.0),” Decision Science Application Report 668, 1985. View at Google Scholar
  11. P. Kerbusch and P. Eigeman, “Flexible and reusable tactical behaviour models for combat aircraft,” Technical Report, DTIC Document, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  12. J. E. Laird, K. J. Coulter, O. M. Jones, P. G. Kenny, F. Koss, and P. E. Nielsen, “Integrating intelligent computer generated forces in distributed simulation: TacAir-Soar,” in Proceedings of the Simulation Interoperability Workshop (STOW '98), Orlando, Fla, USA, March 1998.
  13. J. Laird, The Soar Cognitive Architecture, MIT Press, 2012.
  14. A. Toubman, J. J. Roessingh, P. Spronck, A. Plaat, and J. van den Herik, “Dynamic scripting with team coordination in air combat simulation,” in Modern Advances in Applied Intelligence: 27th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Other Applications of Applied Intelligent Systems, IEA/AIE 2014, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, June 3–6, 2014, Proceedings, Part I, vol. 8481 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 440–449, Springer, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. A. Toubman, J. J. Roessingh, P. Spronck, A. Plaat, and J. van den Herik, “Improving air-to-air combat behavior through transparent machine learning,” in Proceedings of the Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation & Education Conference (I/ITSEC '14), Orlando, Fla, USA, 2014.
  16. T.-H. Teng, A.-H. Tan, Y.-S. Tan, and A. Yeo, “Self-organizing neural networks for learning air combat maneuvers,” in Proceedings of the Annual International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN '12), pp. 1–8, IEEE, Brisbane, Australia, June 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. J. Roessingh, R. Rijken, R. Merk et al., “Modelling CGFs for tactical air-to-air combat training motivation-based behaviour and machine learning in a common architecture,” Tech. Rep. NLR-TP-2011-540, National Aerospace Laboratory NLR, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  18. K. Virtanen, J. Karelahti, and T. Raivio, “Modeling air combat by a moving horizon influence diagram game,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 1080–1091, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. J. S. McGrew, J. P. How, B. Williams, and N. Roy, “Air-combat strategy using approximate dynamic programming,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 1641–1654, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. M. J. Doyle and A. M. Portrey, “Rapid adaptive realistic behavior modeling is viable for use in training,” in Proceedings of the 23rd Conference on Behavior Representation in Modeling and Simulation (BRIMS '14), pp. 73–80, Washington, DC, USA, April 2014.
  21. O. Petter, “Increasing modularity of UAV control systems using computer game behavior trees,” in Proceedings of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, AIAA 2012-4458, Minneapolis, Minn, USA, August 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. M. Colledanchise and P. Ögren, “How Behavior Trees modularize robustness and safety in hybrid systems,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS '14), pp. 1482–1488, Chicago, Ill, USA, September 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. R. L. Shaw, Fighter Combat: Tactics and Maneuvering, Naval Institute Press, 1985.
  24. M. Nicolau and I. Dempsey, “Introducing grammar based extensions for grammatical evolution,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC '06), pp. 648–655, July 2006. View at Scopus
  25. Y.-L. Lei, Q. Li, F. Yang, W.-P. Wang, and Y.-F. Zhu, “A composable modeling framework for weapon systems effectiveness simulation,” System Engineering Theory & Practice, vol. 33, no. 11, pp. 2954–2966, 2013. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. DMSO, “VV & A recommended practices guide,” Tech. Rep., Defense Modeling and Simulation Office, 2015, http://www.msco.mil/VVA_RPG.html. View at Google Scholar