Research Article
Graph Regularized Nonnegative Matrix Factorization with Sparse Coding
Table 2
Optimal average recognition rates ±
on YALE database with different number of training samples of each person (dimensions = 50).
| Method | | | | | |
| NMF | 62.8% ± 5.7% | 64.4% ± 3.5% | 67.7% ± 4.0% | 76.3% ± 1.0% | 80.8% ± 2.0% | LNMF | 61.5% ± 1.0% | 68.9% ± 1.0% | 70.7% ± 1.5% | 79.0% ± 2.0% | 83.1% ± 2.0% | SNMF | 63.6% ± 3.5% | 65.3% ± 2.5% | 70.0% ± 2.0% | 77.7% ± 2.0% | 82.2% ± 2.0% | GNMF | 63.8% ± 2.9% | 66.7% ± 2.0% | 72.0% ± 2.0% | 80.0% ± 1.5% | 83.1% ± 2.0% | FMD-NMF | 65.3% ± 2.0% | 68.5% ± 1.8% | 71.7% ± 3.0% | 79.8% ± 3.0% | 82.2% ± 3.0% | S-GRNMF_SC | 67.0% ± 1.5% | 70.2% ± 3.0% | 73.3% ± 2.0% | 83.3% ± 1.5% | 85.4% ± 2.0% |
|
|