Research Article

Graph Regularized Nonnegative Matrix Factorization with Sparse Coding

Table 2

Optimal average recognition rates ±   on YALE database with different number of training samples of each person (dimensions = 50).

Method

NMF62.8% ± 5.7%64.4% ± 3.5%67.7% ± 4.0%76.3% ± 1.0%80.8% ± 2.0%
LNMF61.5% ± 1.0% 68.9% ± 1.0% 70.7% ± 1.5% 79.0% ± 2.0% 83.1% ± 2.0%
SNMF63.6% ± 3.5% 65.3% ± 2.5% 70.0% ± 2.0% 77.7% ± 2.0% 82.2% ± 2.0%
GNMF63.8% ± 2.9% 66.7% ± 2.0% 72.0% ± 2.0% 80.0% ± 1.5% 83.1% ± 2.0%
FMD-NMF65.3% ± 2.0%68.5% ± 1.8%71.7% ± 3.0%79.8% ± 3.0%82.2% ± 3.0%
S-GRNMF_SC67.0% ± 1.5% 70.2% ± 3.0% 73.3% ± 2.0% 83.3% ± 1.5% 85.4% ± 2.0%