Research Article  Open Access
Xiujun Lei, Jie Guo, Chang’an Zhu, "VisionBased Faint Vibration Extraction Using Singular Value Decomposition", Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2015, Article ID 306865, 14 pages, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/306865
VisionBased Faint Vibration Extraction Using Singular Value Decomposition
Abstract
Vibration measurement is important for understanding the behavior of engineering structures. Unlike conventional contacttype measurements, visionbased methodologies have attracted a great deal of attention because of the advantages of remote measurement, nonintrusive characteristic, and no mass introduction. It is a new type of displacement sensor which is convenient and reliable. This study introduces the singular value decomposition (SVD) methods for video image processing and presents a vibrationextracted algorithm. The algorithms can successfully realize noncontact displacement measurements without undesirable influence to the structure behavior. SVDbased algorithm decomposes a matrix combined with the former frames to obtain a set of orthonormal image bases while the projections of all video frames on the basis describe the vibration information. By means of simulation, the parameters selection of SVDbased algorithm is discussed in detail. To validate the algorithm performance in practice, sinusoidal motion tests are performed. Results indicate that the proposed technique can provide fairly accurate displacement measurement. Moreover, a sound barrier experiment showing how the highspeed rail trains affect the sound barrier nearby is carried out. It is for the first time to be realized at home and abroad due to the challenge of measuring environment.
1. Introduction
Vibration measurement is an important step for understanding the behavior of engineering structures. Traditional measurement devices, such as accelerometer [1] and global positioning systems [2, 3], have been widely used in the industry. However, these contacttype measurements have several limitations. For example, the introduction of a sensor may affect the behavior of structures. In many situations, such as remote measurement, high temperature, and magnetic fields, installation of a sensor is difficult and the measurement accuracy may be interfered.
Therefore, significant interest has been given to the development of noncontact measuring techniques, such as speckle photography [4], hologram interferometry [5], and laser Doppler vibrometer [6]. Meanwhile, the visionbased technique offers an effective alternative to noncontact displacement measurement. This technique benefits from the progress in image acquisition and computer vision with the advantages of remote measurement, nonintrusive characteristic, and no mass introduction. Hence, this technique has been applied in several areas, including structures monitoring [7–11], human motion [12], and underwater measurement [13]. Lee and Shinozuka [10] used image processing techniques, such as texture recognition and projections of the captured image, to accomplish realtime displacement measurement of a flexible bridge. Jurjo et al. [11] presented an experimental methodology for the dynamic analysis of slender structures based on the digital image acquisition and processing techniques. Trigo et al. [13] implemented a combined computer vision and adaptive Kalman filter approach to identify the coordinates of control points in underwater environment. Reference [14] of Park et al. realized 3D displacement measurement model for health monitoring of structures using a motion capture system.
In essence, these visionbased methodologies are based on a series of image processing techniques for realizing video vibration extraction, including edge detection, image segmentation, and feature tracking. However, effective features are complex and difficult to find. In addition several parameters and thresholds must be adjusted in each step of the process to ensure a good performance. In this work, an alternative methodology is proposed, which introduces the singular value decomposition (SVD) methods for vibration extraction. The SVD method is a common matrixfactorization algorithm in linear algebra that is equivalent to coordinate transform in high dimensional space and can therefore reveal the internal data structure and achieve dimensionality reduction. The SVD method has been widely used in many fields, such as principal component analysis [15, 16], noise reduction [17], faint signal extraction [18, 19], and machine condition monitoring [20].
This work explores the SVD method for video vibration extraction, and the vibrationextracted SVDbased algorithms are presented. Methodology of SVDbased extraction algorithm is investigated in detail in Section 2. A motion simulation of a black circle is introduced to show how the selection of parameters affects the measurement precision. The experiments, sinusoidal motion of a point and train excitation of sound barrier are development. In experiment part, the only needed preparation in advance is one adhesive marker having a negligible mass with respect to the vibrating structure. The additional marker especially can be omitted when the structure has distinct surface patterns, such as textures or edges. In addition, a modification for improving the matching accuracy is reported. The procedure for the SVDbased algorithm is simple, practical, and pervasive and requires little expert interference. The performance of the algorithm is validated by both simulation and experimental examples. The results show that it can accurately extract vibrating signals of large civil structures.
2. Methodology of SVDBased Extraction Algorithm
SVD is a common matrixfactorization algorithm in linear algebra that can be defined as follows. For a matrix , two orthogonal matrices and exist to meet the following form:where is an rectangular diagonal matrix with nonnegative real numbers on the diagonal, , or its transposition decided by or , while is a zero matrix . The diagonal entries are known as the singular values of . The columns of and the columns of are called the leftsingular vectors and rightsingular vectors of , respectively.
To reveal the essence of SVD, (1) can be converted to another form of column vectors and :where , , and . According to the SVD theory, the vectors , orthonormal to one another, form the orthonormal basis of the dimensional space; the vectors , orthonormal to one another, form the orthonormal basis of dimensional space. From (2), the SVD breaks a matrix into simple and meaningful pieces, whereas the magnitudes of represent the energy distribution of the pieces. The front singular values are large, which point to where the interesting information is, whereas the latter values are nearly close to zero, which can be regarded as noise. Thus, the former pieces can be truncated as the approximation of the original matrix as follows:
The SVD provides an approach for factoring the matrix into a series of linear approximations that expose the underlying structure and discover the redundancy of the matrix. As a result, dimensionality reduction and information extraction can be realized. In this work, the SVD technique is applied to analyze motion video and extract the vibration signals behind the video. Unlike traditional image processing techniques, the SVDbased extraction algorithm does not need any image manipulation, such as edge detection, image segmentation, and feature tracking, which require the adjustment of several parameters and threshold values. The extraction procedure mainly contains two steps: matrix decomposition and image projection. A set of orthonormal image bases (OIB) is obtained by decomposing a matrix created from the former video frames, which exposes the vibrating structure of the video. The vibration information is then revealed in some component signals after projecting all the frames on the OIB.
From the brief procedure, the SVDbased extraction algorithm is simple and straightforward. Based on the intrinsic characteristics of SVD, the algorithm is robust to noise and can always obtain smooth extracted results. The algorithm principle is explained in Section 2.1. More details about the use of the algorithm, such as the meaning of the component signals and the discussion of the algorithm parameters, are discussed in Sections 2.2 and 2.3.
2.1. Principle of the SVDBased Algorithm
Given a video containing frames, each frame is an image, denoted by , . Before applying the SVDbased extraction algorithm, a scope is first selected in the video image. The selection of the scope must ensure that the video in the scope always focuses on the moving object or feature. Therefore, the information hidden in the scope is all about the vibration and SVD can reveal the reliable signals.
Suppose that the height of the scope is and the width is . The subimages truncated from the video frames are denoted by , . The subimages to column vectors are transformed and the former vectors are combined into a global matrix, which can be described as using MATLAB code for explaining conveniently.
The matrix is then decomposed by SVD, and matrices , , and are then obtained. In the diagonal matrix , the former significant singular values are reserved, whereas the rest are set to zero. Thus, the decomposition can be expressed as follows:where and ; the definitions of , , and are similar to (1). In (4), the vectors are orthonormal to one another and form the orthonormal basis of dimensional space. Given the length of the vector is , can be rewritten as matrix form, denoted by . Thus, the matrices form a set of OIB. According to the SVD theory, this set of OIB may reveal some characteristics of the video. Given that the subimages forming the matrix all reflect the vibration of the same object, the OIB may expose the underlying vibration structure of the video, which is verified later by the motion simulation of black circle.
Corresponding to the th component, the vector is a coordinate of the projection of the global matrix on the basis vector (or ):orwhere and the operation is defined as follows: given two matrices of the same dimension, and , . Thus, is the projection of on and is the projection signal of the subimages on , which reveals the vibration information of the former frames on the th principal direction.
Similar to (6), all the subimages can be projected on the set of OIB, and the th projection signal can be considered as principal component :where . These component signals reflect the vibration information of the whole video.
The procedure of the SVDbased extraction algorithm is listed as follows:(a)A fixed scope with the size of is selected from the video image, in which the subimage always focuses on the moving object or feature.(b)The subimages in the scope is truncated from the video, and the former subimages are combined to form a global matrix .(c)The SVD is then applied to , and the key singular values are retained with the corresponding orthonormal vectors reshaped as matrices that represent a set of OIB.(d)All the subimages are projected on the set of OIB and the component signals are obtained, which reflect the vibration information of the video.
For easy understanding, the procedure is illustrated in Figure 1 by applying the method to a simulation example. The SVDbased algorithm is then applied to extract the path coordinates. For conciseness, the motion equations, whose shape is an ellipse, are expressed as follows:where the vibration frequency Hz and the sampling frequency Hz. The algorithm parameters are set as and . The extraction results with their spectra are shown in Figure 2.
The first component signal has small variation around a high level, which may be assumed as the brightness information of the subimages. The second and third components have the same spectrum peak as the input frequency, indicating that these two signals may be related to the video vibration. Compared with the input motion in (8), the second component signal is similar to the input, and the third is similar to the input. Moreover, the other components vibrate faster with high harmonic spectra, and their amplitudes are small compared with the former components. Thus, the latter components can be regarded as disturbance terms introduced by the computational accuracy error, which can be explained by the fact that the former three components account for more than 98% of the total signal energy. In practice, only the former three singular values and their corresponding orthonormal vectors are calculated to save computing time, which can be conveniently realized by the function svds.
The results show that the SVDbased extraction algorithm is similar to dimension reduction. Although the pixels of the video image can be considered as features reflecting the video vibration, the extraction algorithm can remarkably reduce the feature dimension and obtain only the component signals, which reveal the vibration information hidden behind the video. OIB has an important role in the process and deeply exposes the underlying vibration structure of the video. The brief processes and the results demonstrate that the SVDbased extraction algorithm is efficient and effective. Similar to the NCCbased algorithm, the SVDbased method is robust to different lighting conditions because it directly extracts the brightness information as the first component signal.
However, with regard to the actual physical significance of the components, an explicit conclusion based on the theoretical analysis above is difficult to achieve, while the NCCbased algorithm can be used to help explain the process from the numerical simulation perspective.
2.2. Significance Analysis of the Component Signals
From the decomposition in (4), the global matrix is composed of component matrices, which can be expressed aswhere , . Equation (9) shows that each component matrix is equivalent to a vibration subvideo containing frame images whose sizes are . In other words, the vibration in the original video can be decomposed into vibration components in the subvideos, whereas each subvideo corresponds with the corresponding singular value or the component signal. The physical significance of the component signals can be realized by reconstructing the subvideos and analyzing these components through the NCCbased algorithm. However, the reconstructed subvideos showed that obtaining the obvious vibration intuitively is difficult. The reason is that the first component signal, variating slightly on a high level, is a reflection of image average brightness, so the corresponding subvideo contains all brightness information, whereas the other subvideos only display extra difference about vibration free from brightness, thereby bringing difficulty to the significance analysis. Therefore, we reconstruct the subvideos by another way: , , and consider as the th subvideo. The reconstitution procedure is illustrated as in Figure 3.
After obtaining the subvideos, the SVDbased algorithm is performed by considering the first frame of the original video as the source image and the subvideo frames as the template images. The results of the simulation example in Section 2.1 are shown in Figures 4(a) and 4(b).
(a)
(b)
(c)
The results showed that the SVDextracted signals in the direction are constant, except for the second subvideo, whose direction signal is a standard cosine signal similar to that of the input in (8). The signals in the direction are constant, except for the third subvideo, whose direction signal is a standard sine signal similar to that of the input in (8). Therefore, the second and third components signals are related to the simulation inputs and , respectively, and both reflect the vibration information of the original video, whereas the other components are not related to the vibration status. In practice, only the former three component signals are needed in performing the SVDbased extraction algorithm because the first component signal represents the brightness variation of video, while the second and third components reveal all the vibration information.
The trajectories of the second and third subvideos are plotted in Figure 4(c). These two trajectories are overall orthogonal, which can be interpreted by the decomposition irrelevance of SVD. Thus, the SVDbased extraction algorithm provides two orthonormal image bases: and . When the original video is projected on these two bases, the vibration in original video is decomposed into two orthogonal vibration, which are simple and easy to analyze and contained in the subvideos.
To further exhibit the algorithm effect, another simulation example with a complicated vibrating path is provided with the inputs
The results obtained by applying the SVDbased algorithm for significance analysis are shown in Figure 5. Only the second and third components reflect the video vibration information, whereas the others are not related to the vibration. Although the complexity of the inputs increases, the orthogonality between the trajectories is still satisfied. The only difference is that the two trajectories are globally rotated with an angle compared with the simple example.
(a)
(b)
(c)
2.3. Selection of Algorithm Parameters
Several parameters must be chosen in applying the SVDbased algorithm, including the size and shape of the scope and the count of frames used in the decomposition of SVD. Instead of using width and height to describe the scope, the scope area and widthheight ratio are used as the representation of size and shape. The selection of these parameters influences the performance and computing time. The extent of the influence of these parameters is discussed in this section.
Considering the simulation in Section 2.1 as an example, and by performing the SVDbased algorithm in the case of one parameter varying and the others fixed, the algorithm performance along the varying parameter is obtained. The curve of the performance provides an idea on the selection of algorithm parameters. The variation ranges of the parameters are shown in Table 1.

Two criteria are proposed for evaluating the performance: the Correlation Coefficient (CC), used to determine the waveshape matching degree, and the RootMeanSquare Ratio (RMSR) between the extracted signal and real input, used to measure the recovering accuracy, which are defined as follows:where is the extracted signal; is the real input; is the mean value of ; and is the mean value of . The CC ranges from 0 to 1, where 0 means no correlation and 1 indicates perfect correlation.
2.3.1. Influence of the Parameter
Let the parameter range from 5 to 100, whereas the scope is set as , , as shown in the first line of Table 1. Applying the SVDbased algorithm, the results are shown in Figure 6. The red curves marked by circle markers are the CC and RMSR criteria between the second component signal and the input , whereas the blue curves marked by square markers are the criteria between the third component signal and the input . Figure 6(c) displays the computing time of different .
(a)
(b)
(c)
When is small, the CC and RMSR increase gradually. After a value about 46, CC gets close to 1 and RMSR tends towards stability, indicating that large is needed to ensure good performance. The tendency of RMSR, which is not to 1, indicates that the amplitude of extracted signal is unequal to the real input. Thus, the magnitude of the extracted signals does not have physical significance. Figure 6(c) shows that the computing time increases linearly along with . Thus, the selection of needs balance between the computing time and the algorithm performance.
2.3.2. Influence of the Parameter
The area changes under the condition of and ; that is, the scope is square. Suppose that the side length of square scope ranges from 3 to 100. The results are shown in Figure 7.
(a)
(b)
(c)
Figure 7 shows that the CC criterion remains unchanged around 1 and the RMSR increases linearly along with the side length, indicating that the scope area has little effect on the algorithm performance, except for enlarging the signal amplitude. However, the scope area has a significant impact on computing time, which increases quadratically.
2.3.3. Influence of the Parameter
Assuming and , the widthheight ratio changes from 0.05 to 20. Notably, when is small, the corresponding relationship changes to the extracted results: the second component corresponds to the input instead of , whereas input is reflected by the third component. Thus, adjustments are made by inverting the order of the two components at small in Figures 8(a) and 8(b).
(a)
(b)
(c)
The results show that the widthheight ratio also has little impact on the CC criterion, except for the inversion of the corresponding relationship. The RMSR result shows that the amplitude of the component signals changes along with . When is small, the vibration signal in the horizontal direction is suppressed so that the extracted result has a small amplitude. Meanwhile, the signal in the vertical direction is promoted to obtain a large amplitude. Thus, the direction signal switches to the third component and the direction signal switches to the second. When is large, the result is opposite. Therefore, the amplitude of the results is decided by both the area and the widthheight ratio; that is, the SVDbased algorithm has directivity. When the scope has emphasis in one direction, the vibration on this direction is easier to extract and may have a larger amplitude. The circular scope may be more suitable for use despite its complexity, which is not further studied in this work. In addition, the computing time does not significantly change because the size of scope is constant, as shown in Figure 8(c).
In conclusion, (a) the matching degree is only related to and is related to neither the scope, the size, nor the shape. Large is helpful for extracting the vibration signals accurately but also increases computing time. (b) The amplitude of the extracted signals is not equal to the practical inputs, which depends on the size and shape of the scope. Large area and long direction increase the amplitude. (c) The computing time is related to and the scope area, except for the scope shape. The impact of the scope area is greater than , indicating that the calculated amount of the matrix decomposition in (4) is decided by and the scope area . Finally, the selection of parameters can be summarized as follows:(a)A larger is better, but the selection needs balance between the performance and the computing time.(b)The size of the scope should not be too large.(c)Square scope is simple and suitable.(d)To ensure good results, can be set large at the price of decreasing the area.
3. Experimental Verification
3.1. Grating Ruler Shake Table Test
In order to evaluate the performance of the SVDbased vibration extraction technique, the pixel level accuracy, and the target track ability of a dynamic response, a laboratory test was carried out using a grating ruler which called incremental grating displacement sensor moving table subjected to sinusoidal excitation. In this experiment, the grating ruler was fixed in the moving table so that it can accurately track the motion signals of moving table. The sampling frequency of the grating ruler is 20 Hz and the grating pitch is 0.02 mm with 1 um resolving power. One target was fixed on a table which could be programmed to move in one direction with an arbitrary amplitude and frequency. As shown in Figure 9(a), video camera was placed at about 3 m away from the table and stood at comfortable height so that the shake table exists in camera plane. It should be better that the image plane be parallel to the object plane but not necessary.
(a)
(b)
In this experiment, the camera captures the target panel with 200 frames per second and detects the motion of target on a connected computer as shown in Figure 9(b). The actual pixel size of a digital image was measured by predesigned target panel; the size of a pixel was calibrated such that 1 pixel corresponds to about 0.185 mm. The shake table was programmed to move along direction in sinusoidal motion of 1.5 mm amplitude, with a frequency of 0.5 Hz. The whole measurement was taken for 10 seconds. In the whole process of experiment, the displacement obtained by vision system was compared with that measured by the grating ruler. The size of the captured image was ; the algorithm parameters are set as ; and the scope is square with the size of which covers part of the white circular target panel. Some postprocessing is necessary because the vibration signal obtained directly by SVDbased algorithm cannot agree with grating ruler data. Figure 10 shows horizontal displacement time histories measured by the visionbased system and the grating ruler.
(a)
(b)
The maximum error is 0.15 mm and basically within error limit of 0.1 mm. The extraction precision between these two algorithms is almost the same while the SVDbased algorithm costs less computation time than the NCCbased algorithm. Therefore, both algorithms can successfully accomplish the vibration extraction and obtain the same conclusion. However, the difference is that the SVDbased algorithm concentrates all the vibration information in the second component, whereas the NCCbased algorithm divides the information into two signals. The SVDbased algorithm finds a principal direction of vibration different from the  and directions, and the results of NCC are the projections of the principal direction on and similar to rotation of coordinates. Thus, the SVDbased algorithm reveals the vibration essence, whereas the NCCbased algorithm obtains results with actual physical meaning and the unit of results is pixel. Altogether, the visionbased vibration extraction using singular value decomposition is available.
3.2. Measurement of Sound Barrier Experiment
An attempt to extract the vibration of sound barrier is reported to validate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithms in field. Sound barrier, also called soundwall or noise barrier, is a platy structure designed to protect inhabitants on both sides of the railway from noise pollution. It has been found that sound barrier is the most effective method of mitigating roadway, railway, and industrial noise sources.
However, with the increase in the train speed, strong suction and impact are introduced when highspeed trains pass by the section installed with sound barriers, leading to violent vibrations of the barriers that may cause the fatigue of materials and loose assembly. In addition, when the sound barriers are damaged and fall on the railway track, disastrous consequences may occur. Thus, to improve the performance of sound barriers, the vibration course when the highspeed train passes should be first measured. However, traditional measurement methods are difficult to use because of the inconvenience to install the barriers at the working train line. Therefore, visionbased measurement has been put forward to solve such problem.
The viaduct installed with sound barriers is located in Kunshan, as shown in Figure 11(a). The experiment is set up below the viaduct in Figure 11(b). The setup mainly includes a PC and a highspeed camera, which are used to capture the displacement vibration video. When a highspeed train passed by, a video containing the vibration of sound barrier is shot at 232 frames per second. One image of the video is displayed in Figure 11(c). In practice, the assumption that the deformation of barrier is negligible relative to the vibration is acceptable. Although the barrier is shot at a certain elevation, the vibration in the video can be considered as the projection of the actual movements on the imaging plane of the camera, which has no effect on the extraction of vibration properties.
Applying the SVDbased extraction algorithm to the barrier video, the second and third components signals with their corresponding spectrum are shown in Figure 12. The algorithm parameters are set as ; the scope is square with the size of , whose position is displayed as the red frame in Figure 11(c). The second component clearly indicates the moment of train arrival, and three obvious spectral peaks can be observed in its spectrum at 10.42, 21.07, and 45.77 Hz, which can be considered as the characteristic frequencies of the sound barrier. The third component signal indicates the moment of train arrival; however, its spectrum implies that it is more similar to white noise. Thus, the vibration information of the barrier comes together in the second component.
Actually, comparing the proposed method with traditional measurements is difficult because of assembling inconvenience. However, the trends of vibration are obvious when the train arrives and accord with standard signal of sound barriers. The accuracy of SVDbased algorithms is proved in measurement of harmonic motion experiment. In a word, the vision technique can successfully accomplish the vibration extraction of sound barrier.
4. Conclusions
In this study, a simple and effective algorithm based on the SVD methods was investigated for vibration extraction. The algorithms realized the noncontact and remote measurements requiring little expert interference and extra preparation. The SVDbased algorithm skillfully obtains a set of OIB by performing a simple matrix decomposition; the projections of the video frames on this OIB represent the vibration information. Further, through the study of simulation, we found that only the second and third components signals contain the vibration information, which are orthogonal. Thus, the algorithm can be sped up using the SVD function to calculate only the former three singular values. It can be observed obviously that the SVDbased algorithm spends far less time than the traditional NCCbased algorithm in the measurement of harmonic motion experiments. The selection of algorithm parameters was also discussed, providing the foundation for making better use of the SVDbased algorithm. In addition, it is the first time to measure the vibration of highspeed rail trains sound barrier. Both the simulation and experimental study validated the effectiveness of the proposed algorithms. The experimental example also showed the reliable ability to accurately extract vibrating signals in practice. The visionbased techniques can accomplish vibration measurement of large civil structures, where access for installation of conventional instrumentation is difficult.
Further work is under way to research the theoretical explanation of the OIB. Moreover, the obtaining of OIB requires the participation of the former frames and impedes the realtime extraction of vibration, which needs further improvement.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Key Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) under Grant no. 2014CB049500 and the Key Technologies R&D Program of Anhui Province under Grant no. 1301021005.
References
 W. Zhou and D. Chelidze, “Blind source separation based vibration mode identification,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 3072–3087, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Meo, G. Zumpano, X. L. Meng, E. Cosser, G. Roberts, and A. Dodson, “Measurements of dynamic properties of a medium span suspension bridge by using the wavelet transforms,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 1112–1133, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 L. Xu, J. J. Guo, and J. J. Jiang, “Timefrequency analysis of a suspension bridge based on GPS,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 254, no. 1, pp. 105–116, 2002. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Z. Yuanpeng, Z. Huaning, Z. Wenling, and L. Hefei, “Application of the fourier transform in electronic speckle photography,” Experimental Mechanics, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 18–24, 2002. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. L. Valin, E. Gonçalves, F. Palacios, and J. R. Pérez, “Methodology for analysis of displacement using digital holography,” Optics and Lasers in Engineering, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 99–111, 2005. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. H. Nassif, M. Gindy, and J. Davis, “Comparison of laser Doppler vibrometer with contact sensors for monitoring bridge deflection and vibration,” NDT & E International, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 213–218, 2005. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Zhao, J. Lin, J. Yao, and J. Ding, “Twodimensional impact reconstruction method for rail defect inspection,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2014, Article ID 236574, 9 pages, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J.W. Zhou, D.H. Liu, L.Y. Shao, and Z.L. Wang, “Application of digital image correlation to measurement of packaging material mechanical properties,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2013, Article ID 204875, 8 pages, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 B. H. Kim, “Extracting modal parameters of a cable on shaky motion pictures,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 49, no. 12, pp. 3–12, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. J. Lee and M. Shinozuka, “Realtime displacement measurement of a flexible bridge using digital image processing techniques,” Experimental Mechanics, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 105–114, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 D. L. B. R. Jurjo, C. Magluta, N. Roitman, and P. B. Gonçalves, “Experimental methodology for the dynamic analysis of slender structures based on digital image processing techniques,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 1369–1382, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 P. J. Figueroa, N. J. Leite, and R. M. L. Barros, “Tracking soccer players aiming their kinematical motion analysis,” Computer Vision and Image Understanding, vol. 101, no. 2, pp. 122–135, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 F. C. Trigo, F. P. R. Martins, A. T. Fleury, and H. C. Silva Jr., “Identification of a scaledmodel riser dynamics through a combined computer vision and adaptive Kalman filter approach,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 43, no. 12, pp. 124–140, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. W. Park, H. S. Park, J. H. Kim, and H. Adeli, “3D displacement measurement model for health monitoring of structures using a motion capture system,” Measurement, vol. 59, pp. 352–362, 2015. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. de Leeuw, “Principal component analysis of binary data by iterated singular value decomposition,” Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 21–39, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 K.C. Lee, J.S. Ou, and M.C. Fang, “Application of SVD noisereduction technique to PCA based radar target recognition,” Progress in Electromagnetics Research, vol. 81, pp. 447–459, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Bydder and J. Du, “Noise reduction in multipleecho data sets using singular value decomposition,” Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 849–856, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. AlZaben and A. AlSmadi, “Extraction of foetal ECG by combination of singular value decomposition and neurofuzzy inference system,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 137–143, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 X. Z. Zhao and B. Y. Ye, “Selection of effective singular values using difference spectrum and its application to fault diagnosis of headstock,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 1617–1631, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. Cempel, “Generalized singular value decomposition in multidimensional condition monitoring of machines—a proposal of comparative diagnostics,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 701–711, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 Xiujun Lei et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.