Landing Impact Analysis of a Bioinspired Intermittent Hopping Robot with Consideration of Friction

<div>Effect of  <svg height="9.39034pt" id="M358" style="vertical-align:-3.42943pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -5.96091 12.6652 9.39034" width="12.6652pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M538 96L524 119C492 88 454 63 446 63C439 63 434 70 440 101C463 223 491 341 518 448H508L433 422L401 276C355 192 240 56 188 56C163 56 154 89 163 133C184 233 207 338 235 443L230 448L152 424L58 17C40 -60 23 -143 23 -185C23 -241 42 -261 63 -261C92 -261 117 -241 125 -227L124 -221C109 -209 89 -165 89 -103C89 -55 96 -13 105 26H107C121 -3 134 -12 151 -12C172 -12 194 -5 221 16C279 61 330 124 384 194H386C381 159 377 141 368 105C343 3 363 -12 383 -12C416 -12 486 35 538 96Z" id="g113-234"></path><glyph.data ascent="3473" descent="-2876" horiz-adv-x="555" vert-adv-y="555"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,6.89,3.132)"><path d="M538 684C542 703 539 710 529 710C512 710 455 682 363 674L361 644H396C444 644 448 642 438 594L405 438C373 450 347 451 336 451C288 451 200 416 147 374C69 312 24 207 24 113C24 29 60 -12 94 -12C126 -12 156 4 196 30C231 53 296 100 346 166H348L328 81C311 10 325 -12 348 -12C380 -12 450 24 512 98L495 125C466 97 431 70 417 70C408 70 408 80 411 98L538 684ZM390 373L361 240C336 196 210 56 145 56C132 56 113 73 113 131C113 216 156 338 220 379C243 394 266 402 303 402C331 402 375 388 390 373Z" id="g50-101"></path><glyph.data ascent="3443" descent="-2856" horiz-adv-x="564" vert-adv-y="564"></glyph.data></g></svg> on the kinetic energy loss <svg height="8.68572pt" id="M359" style="vertical-align:-0.0498209pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -8.6359 16.5019 8.68572" width="16.5019pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M600 0V24L339 665L311 657L43 24V0H600ZM497 50H107L303 539L497 50Z" id="g113-133"></path><glyph.data ascent="3473" descent="-2876" horiz-adv-x="641" vert-adv-y="641"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,8.327,0)"><path d="M593 650H142L136 622C219 616 224 611 209 531L130 120C114 39 108 34 23 28L17 0H501C518 32 557 130 568 158L540 169C519 132 495 93 469 70C439 43 409 35 332 35C272 35 241 37 225 50C211 61 211 89 222 149L253 320H350C441 320 443 312 441 239H471L510 434H481C455 366 448 358 360 358H260L303 572C311 613 312 615 348 615H431C509 615 522 603 532 581C544 555 546 531 545 491L574 493C583 555 592 631 593 650Z" id="g113-70"></path><glyph.data ascent="3473" descent="-2876" horiz-adv-x="616" vert-adv-y="616"></glyph.data></g></svg> and the rotation velocity <svg height="11.6425pt" id="M360" style="vertical-align:-0.2063999pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -11.4361 12.2203 11.6425" width="12.2203pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M615 290C615 392 563 448 529 448C511 448 491 441 484 434L483 425C518 400 546 349 546 273C546 158 504 46 417 46C381 46 356 77 356 142C356 184 380 293 392 334L387 340L307 323C305 288 296 228 287 188C265 94 221 52 180 52C144 52 112 89 112 171C112 278 164 372 241 430L226 454C106 394 23 288 23 155C23 40 79 -12 139 -12C184 -12 245 32 285 85C292 31 322 -12 376 -12C423 -12 470 18 501 45C570 104 615 184 615 290Z" id="g113-246"></path><glyph.data ascent="3473" descent="-2876" horiz-adv-x="638" vert-adv-y="638"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,8.295,-5.741)"><path d="M310 541L304 571C290 586 211 619 185 610L80 76L131 52L310 541Z" id="g50-31"></path><glyph.data ascent="3443" descent="-2856" horiz-adv-x="361" vert-adv-y="361"></glyph.data></g></svg>.</div>

Mathematical Problems in Engineering

fig8

Figure 8

Figure 8: Landing Impact Analysis of a Bioinspired Intermittent Hopping Robot with Consideration of Friction 