A Hybrid Global Optimization Algorithm Based on Wind Driven Optimization and Differential Evolution

<div>Comparison of performance of algorithms for minimization of <svg height="12.7178pt" id="M661" style="vertical-align:-3.42947pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -9.28833 16.2406 12.7178" width="16.2406pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M619 670C619 686 593 712 555 712S459 686 410 634S335 504 320 430H250L219 400L222 388H312L258 73C223 -133 201 -166 187 -180C175 -191 158 -199 140 -199C123 -199 88 -188 74 -172C68 -166 63 -164 54 -171C38 -185 23 -201 23 -215C23 -236 60 -261 93 -261C122 -261 161 -247 207 -200C268 -138 300 -71 337 94C365 220 376 277 394 387L501 399L521 430H401C432 623 464 665 501 665C524 665 544 651 567 627C577 617 583 618 592 625C601 631 619 651 619 670Z" id="g113-103"></path><glyph.data ascent="3473" descent="-2876" horiz-adv-x="642" vert-adv-y="642"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,6.721,3.132)"><path d="M389 0V32C297 37 291 46 291 118V635C234 612 176 595 109 583V556L161 554C203 551 207 548 207 497V118C207 46 201 37 110 32V0H389Z" id="g58-47"></path><glyph.data ascent="1007" descent="-369" horiz-adv-x="487" vert-adv-y="487"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,11.153,3.132)"><path d="M389 0V32C297 37 291 46 291 118V635C234 612 176 595 109 583V556L161 554C203 551 207 548 207 497V118C207 46 201 37 110 32V0H389Z" id="g58-47"></path><glyph.data ascent="1007" descent="-369" horiz-adv-x="487" vert-adv-y="487"></glyph.data></g></svg> (<svg height="8.68572pt" id="M662" style="vertical-align:-0.0498209pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -8.6359 31.2817 8.68572" width="31.2817pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M743 375C743 570 607 650 407 650H136L130 622C214 612 220 606 204 526L125 122C110 43 105 36 24 27L17 0H250C382 0 482 23 571 76C680 141 743 248 743 375ZM644 379C644 188 520 36 305 36C277 36 249 38 229 46C205 55 202 71 212 126L293 553C300 588 306 600 317 606C330 613 356 617 390 617C547 617 644 537 644 379Z" id="g113-69"></path><glyph.data ascent="3473" descent="-2876" horiz-adv-x="766" vert-adv-y="766"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,13.59,0)"><path d="M535 323V373H52V323H535ZM535 138V188H52V138H535Z" id="g117-34"></path><glyph.data ascent="3473" descent="-2876" horiz-adv-x="587" vert-adv-y="587"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,24.853,0)"><path d="M412 140C382 77 369 73 315 73H129L270 222C362 320 402 379 402 466C402 571 322 635 234 635C177 635 130 609 99 576L42 495L64 475C90 514 133 568 201 568C274 568 318 519 318 435C318 349 255 267 193 193C144 135 87 78 32 23V0H405C417 45 427 89 440 131L412 140Z" id="g113-51"></path><glyph.data ascent="3473" descent="-2876" horiz-adv-x="480" vert-adv-y="480"></glyph.data></g></svg>).</div>

Mathematical Problems in Engineering

fig11

Figure 11

Figure 11: A Hybrid Global Optimization Algorithm Based on Wind Driven Optimization and Differential Evolution 