Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2015, Article ID 573894, 15 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/573894
Research Article

A Class of Parameter Estimation Methods for Nonlinear Muskingum Model Using Hybrid Invasive Weed Optimization Algorithm

1College of Computer Science and Electronic Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha, Hunan 410082, China
2School of Information Science and Engineering, Hunan City University, Yiyang, Hunan 413000, China
3Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Chizhou College, Chizhou, Anhui 247000, China
4College of Mathematics and Information Science, Guangxi University, Nanning, Guangxi 530004, China

Received 27 January 2015; Revised 7 May 2015; Accepted 18 May 2015

Academic Editor: Gisele Mophou

Copyright © 2015 Aijia Ouyang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. Yoon and G. Padmanabhan, “Parameter estimation of linear and nonlinear Muskingum models,” Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, vol. 119, no. 5, pp. 600–610, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. J. Chen and X. Yang, “Optimal parameter estimation for Muskingum model based on Gray-encoded accelerating genetic algorithm,” Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 849–858, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. A. Ouyang, Z. Tang, K. Li, A. Sallam, and E. Sha, “Estimating parameters of muskingum model using an adaptive hybrid PSO algorithm,” International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, vol. 28, no. 1, Article ID 1459003, 29 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. S. Mohan, “Parameter estimation of nonlinear muskingum models using genetic algorithm,” Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, vol. 123, no. 2, pp. 137–142, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. Z. W. Geem, “Parameter estimation for the nonlinear Muskingum model using the BFGS technique,” Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, vol. 132, no. 5, pp. 474–478, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. H.-J. Chu and L.-C. Chang, “Applying particle swarm optimization to parameter estimation of the nonlinear muskingum model,” Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 1024–1027, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. Luo and J. Xie, “Parameter estimation for nonlinear muskingum model based on immune clonal selection algorithm,” Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, vol. 15, no. 10, Article ID 006010QHE, pp. 844–851, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. Z. W. Geem, “Parameter estimation of the nonlinear muskingum model using parameter-setting-free harmony search,” Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 684–688, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. R. Barati, “Parameter estimation of nonlinear muskingum models using nelder-mead simplex algorithm,” Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 946–954, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. D.-M. Xu, L. Qiu, and S.-Y. Chen, “Estimation of nonlinear muskingum model parameter using differential evolution,” Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 348–353, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. H. Karahan, G. Gurarslan, and Z. Geem, “Parameter estimation of the nonlinear muskingum flood-routing model using a hybrid harmony search algorithm,” Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 352–360, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  12. M. Niazkar and S. H. Afzali, “Assessment of modified honey bee mating optimization for parameter estimation of nonlinear muskingum models,” Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, vol. 20, no. 4, Article ID 04014055, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. A. R. Mehrabian and C. Lucas, “A novel numerical optimization algorithm inspired from weed colonization,” Ecological Informatics, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 355–366, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. S. Peng, A. Ouyang, and J. J. Zhang, “An adaptive invasive weed optimization algorithm,” International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, vol. 29, no. 2, Article ID 1559004, pp. 1–20, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. D. Kundu, K. Suresh, S. Ghosh, S. Das, and B. K. Panigrahi, “Multi-objective optimization with artificial weed colonies,” Information Sciences, vol. 181, no. 12, pp. 2441–2454, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  16. M. Ahmadi and H. Mojallali, “Chaotic invasive weed optimization algorithm with application to parameter estimation of chaotic systems,” Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, vol. 45, no. 9-10, pp. 1108–1120, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. D. I. Abu-Al-Nadi, O. M. Alsmadi, Z. S. Abo-Hammour, M. F. Hawa, and J. S. Rahhal, “Invasive weed optimization for model order reduction of linear MIMO systems,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 4570–4577, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  18. A. Basak, D. Maity, and S. Das, “A differential invasive weed optimization algorithm for improved global numerical optimization,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 219, no. 12, pp. 6645–6668, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  19. Z. D. Zaharis, C. Skeberis, T. D. Xenos, P. I. Lazaridis, and J. Cosmas, “Design of a novel antenna array beamformer using neural networks trained by modified adaptive dispersion invasive weed optimization based data,” IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting, pp. 455–460, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  20. Z. D. Zaharis, P. I. Lazaridis, J. Cosmas, C. Skeberis, and T. D. Xenos, “Synthesis of a near-optimal high-gain antenna array with main lobe tilting and null filling using taguchi initialized invasive weed optimization,” IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 120–127, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. B. Saravanan, E. R. Vasudevan, and D. P. Kothari, “Unit commitment problem solution using invasive weed optimization algorithm,” International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, vol. 55, pp. 21–28, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. M. Ghasemi, S. Ghavidel, E. Akbari, and A. A. Vahed, “Solving non-linear, non-smooth and non-convex optimal power flow problems using chaotic invasive weed optimization algorithms based on chaos,” Energy, vol. 73, pp. 340–353, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. Y. Zhou, H. Chen, and G. Zhou, “Invasive weed optimization algorithm for optimization no-idle flow shop scheduling problem,” Neurocomputing, vol. 137, pp. 285–292, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. Y. Zhou, Q. Luo, H. Chen, A. He, and J. Wu, “A discrete invasive weed optimization algorithm for solving traveling salesman problem,” Neurocomputing, vol. 151, no. 3, pp. 1227–1236, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  25. A. K. Barisal and R. C. Prusty, “Large scale economic dispatch of power systems using oppositional invasiveweed optimization,” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 29, pp. 122–137, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  26. G. T. McCarthy, “The unit hydrograph and flood routing,” in Proceedings of the Conference of North Atlantic Division, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Providence, RI, USA, 1938.
  27. M. A. Gill, “Flood routing by the Muskingum method,” Journal of Hydrology, vol. 36, no. 3-4, pp. 353–363, 1978. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. V. P. Singh and P. D. Scarlatos, “Analysis of nonlinear Muskingum flood routing,” Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, vol. 113, no. 1, pp. 61–79, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. M. M. Chawla, M. A. Al-Zanaidi, and D. J. Evans, “Generalized trapezoidal formulas for parabolic equations,” International Journal of Computer Mathematics, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 429–443, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  30. Z. Sheng, A. Ouyang, L.-B. Liu, and G. Yuan, “A novel parameter estimation method for muskingum model using new newton-type trust region algorithm,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2014, Article ID 634852, 7 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  31. G. Pan, K. Li, A. Ouyang, X. Zhou, and Y. Xu, “A hybrid clustering algorithm combining cloud model IWO and k-means,” International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, vol. 28, no. 6, Article ID 1450015, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. J. A. Nelder and R. Mead, “A simplex method for function minimization,” The Computer Journal, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 308–313, 1965. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. X. Ren, R. Hao, Z. Sun, and B. Shi, “Quantum behaved particle swarm optimization algorithm based on simplex method,” Microelectronics & Computer, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 154–157, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  34. A. Ouyang, K. Li, T. K. Truong, A. Sallam, and E. H. Sha, “Hybrid particle swarm optimization for parameter estimation of Muskingum model,” Neural Computing & Applications, vol. 25, no. 7-8, pp. 1785–1799, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. Y. Wang and C. Dang, “An evolutionary algorithm for global optimization based on level-set evolution and latin squares,” IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 579–595, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus