Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 612528, 14 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/612528
Research Article

Sensitivity Analysis of the Forward Electroencephalographic Problem Depending on Head Shape Variations

1Division of Applied Mathematics, Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece
2Institute of Chemical Engineering Sciences, Stadiou Street, P.O. Box 1414, 26504 Platani, Patras, Greece

Received 2 October 2014; Revised 22 December 2014; Accepted 31 December 2014

Academic Editor: Kalyana C. Veluvolu

Copyright © 2015 Michael Doschoris et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. F. Kariotou, “On the mathematics of EEG and MEG in spheroidal geometry,” Bulletin of the Greek Mathematical Society, vol. 47, pp. 117–135, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  2. F. Kariotou, “Electroencephalography in ellipsoidal geometry,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 290, no. 1, pp. 324–342, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  3. D. Yao, “Electric potential produced by a dipole in a homogeneous conducting sphere,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 47, no. 7, pp. 964–966, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. G. Dassios, “Electric and magnetic activity of the brain in spherical and ellipsoidal geometry,” in Mathematical Modeling in Biomedical Imaging I, H. Ammari, Ed., Lecture Notes in Mathematics, pp. 133–202, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. H. G. Wieser, K. Schindler, and D. Zumsteg, “EEG in Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease,” Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 117, no. 5, pp. 935–951, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. U. R. Acharya, S. V. Sree, G. Swapna, R. J. Martis, and J. S. Suri, “Automated EEG analysis of epilepsy: a review,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 45, pp. 147–165, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. B. N. Cuffin, “Effects of head shape on EEGs and MEGs,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 44–52, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. B. N. Cuffin, “Effects of local variations in skull and scalp thickness on EEG's and MEG's,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 42–48, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. N. Chauveau, X. Franceries, B. Doyon, B. Rigaud, J. P. Morucci, and P. Celsis, “Effects of skull thickness, anisotropy, and inhomogeneity on forward EEG/ERP computations using a spherical three-dimensional resistor mesh model,” Human Brain Mapping, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 86–97, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. F. Zanow and M. J. Peters, “Individually shaped volume conductor models of the head in EEG source localisation,” Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 582–588, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. N. von Ellenrieder, C. H. Muravchik, and A. Nehorai, “Effects of geometric head model perturbations on the EEG forward and inverse problems,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 421–429, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. N. Von Ellenrieder, C. H. Muravchik, M. Wagner, and A. Nehorai, “Effect of head shape variations among individuals on the EEG/MEG forward and inverse problems,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 587–597, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. B. Lanfer, M. Scherg, M. Dannhauer, T. R. Knösche, M. Burger, and C. H. Wolters, “Influences of skull segmentation inaccuracies on EEG source analysis,” NeuroImage, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 418–431, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. F. N. Wilson and R. H. Bayley, “The electric field of an eccentric dipole in a homogeneous spherical conducting medium,” Circulation, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 84–92, 1950. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. N. G. de Bruijn, Asymptotic Methods in Analysis, vol. 4 of Bibliotheca Mathematica, North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1958. View at MathSciNet
  16. R. Bellman, Perturbation Techniques in Mathematics, Engineering and Physics, Holt Rinehart & Winston, New York, NY, USA, 1966.
  17. G. Nolte and G. Curio, “Perturbative analytical solutions of the electric forward problem for realistic volume conductors,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 86, no. 5, pp. 2800–2811, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. D. B. Geselowitz, “On bioelectric potentials in an inhomogeneous volume conductor,” Biophysical Journal, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 1967. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. G. D. Murray, G. M. Teasdale, R. Braakman et al., “The European Brain Injury Consortium survey of head injuries,” Acta Neurochirurgica, vol. 141, no. 3, pp. 223–236, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. L. G. Farkas, Anthropometry of the Head and Face, Raven Press, New York, NY, USA, 1994.
  21. R. Ball, C. Shu, P. Xi, M. Rioux, Y. Luximon, and J. Molenbroek, “A comparison between Chinese and Caucasian head shapes,” Applied Ergonomics, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 832–839, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. R. Plonsey and D. B. Heppner, “Considerations of quasi-stationarity in electrophysiological systems,” The Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 657–664, 1967. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. J. A. Stratton, Electromagnetic Theory, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 1941.
  24. O. Gilad, L. Horesh, and D. S. Holder, “Design of electrodes and current limits for low frequency electrical impedance tomography of the brain,” Medical and Biological Engineering & Computing, vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 621–633, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. J.-F. P. J. Abascal, S. R. Arridge, D. Atkinson et al., “Use of anisotropic modelling in electrical impedance tomography; description of method and preliminary assessment of utility in imaging brain function in the adult human head,” NeuroImage, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 258–268, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. H. Hallez, B. Vanrumste, R. Grech et al., “Review on solving the forward problem in EEG source analysis,” Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, vol. 4, article 46, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. M. Doschoris and G. Dassios, “The influence of surface deformations on the source position and momentfor EEG,” in preparation.
  28. F. W. J. Olver, D. W. Lozier, R. F. Boisvert, and C. W. Clark, Eds., NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2010. View at MathSciNet