Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2015, Article ID 640305, 13 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/640305
Research Article

Generalized Finite Difference Time Domain Method and Its Application to Acoustics

1School of Computer Software, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
2Tianjin Key Laboratory of Cognitive Computing and Application, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
3Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Ishikawa 923-1292, Japan

Received 28 August 2014; Revised 11 January 2015; Accepted 11 January 2015

Academic Editor: Shaofan Li

Copyright © 2015 Jianguo Wei et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. N. O. Sadiku, Numerical Techniques in Electromagnetics, CRC Press, 2000.
  2. D. M. Sullivan, Electromagnetic Simulation Using the FDTD Method, John Wiley & Sons, 2013.
  3. J. W. Swegle and S. W. Attaway, “On the feasibility of using Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics for underwater explosion calculations,” Computational Mechanics, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 151–168, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. T. Belytschko, Y. Krongauz, D. Organ, M. Fleming, and P. Krysl, “Meshless methods: an overview and recent developments,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 139, no. 1–4, pp. 3–47, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. G. R. Johnson, R. A. Stryk, and S. R. Beissel, “SPH for high velocity impact computations,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 139, no. 1-4, pp. 347–373, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. N. Perrone and R. Kao, “A general finite difference method for arbitrary meshes,” Computers & Structures, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 45–57, 1975. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. P. S. Jensen, “Finite difference techniques for variable grids,” Computers & Structures, vol. 2, no. 1-2, pp. 17–29, 1972. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. T. Liszka and J. Orkisz, “The finite difference method at arbitrary irregular grids and its application in applied mechanics,” Computers and Structures, vol. 11, no. 1-2, pp. 83–95, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J. J. Benito, F. Urea, and L. Gavete, “Influence of several factors in the generalized finite difference method,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 25, no. 12, pp. 1039–1053, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. L. Gavete, M. L. Gavete, and J. J. Benito, “Improvements of generalized finite difference method and comparison with other meshless method,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 27, no. 10, pp. 831–847, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J. J. Benito, F. Urena, and L. Gavete, “Solving parabolic and hyperbolic equations by the generalized finite difference method,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 209, no. 2, pp. 208–233, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  12. C.-M. Fan and P.-W. Li, “Generalized finite difference method for solving two-dimensional Burgers’ equations,” Procedia Engineering, vol. 79, pp. 55–60, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. J. J. Benito, F. Ureña, L. Gavete, E. Salete, and A. Muelas, “A GFDM with PML for seismic wave equations in heterogeneous media,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 252, pp. 40–51, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  14. Y. L. Chen, K. B. Huang, and X. Yu, “Numerical study of detonation shock dynamics using generalized finite difference method,” Science China: Physics, Mechanics and Astronomy, vol. 54, no. 10, pp. 1883–1888, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J. F. Lee, R. Lee, and A. Cangellaris, “Time-domain finite-element methods,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 430–442, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  16. G. M. Zhang and R. C. Batra, “Modified smoothed particle hydrodynamics method and its application to transient problems,” Computational Mechanics, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 137–146, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. M U Guide, The mathworks Inc., Natick, Mass, USA, 2013.
  18. G. Mur, “Absorbing boundary conditions for the finite-difference approximation of the time-domain electromagnetic-field equations,” IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 377–382, 1981. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. T. Yokota, S. Sakamoto, and H. Tachibana, “Visualization of sound propagation and scattering in rooms,” Acoustical Science and Technology, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 40–46, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. S. Sakamoto, H. Nagatomo, A. Ushiyama, and H. Tachibana, “Calculation of impulse responses and acoustic parameters in a hall by the finite-difference time-domain method,” Acoustical Science and Technology, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 256–265, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus