Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2015, Article ID 685826, 13 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/685826
Research Article

Parametric Sensitivity Analysis for Importance Measure on Failure Probability and Its Efficient Kriging Solution

Institute of Aircraft Reliability Engineering, Department of Engineering Mechanics, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710129, China

Received 27 May 2014; Revised 23 September 2014; Accepted 23 September 2014

Academic Editor: Shaomin Wu

Copyright © 2015 Yishang Zhang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. Der Kiureghian, “Analysis of structural reliability under parameter uncertainties,” Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 351–358, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. S. Mahadevan, Probability, Reliability, and Statistical Methods in Engineering Design, John Wiley & Sons, 2000.
  3. G. I. Schuëller, “On the treatment of uncertainties in structural mechanics and analysis,” Computers and Structures, vol. 85, no. 5-6, pp. 235–243, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. P. Bjerager and S. Krenk, “Parametric sensitivity in first order reliability theory,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, vol. 115, no. 7, pp. 1577–1582, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. E. Castillo, R. Mínguez, and C. Castillo, “Sensitivity analysis in optimization and reliability problems,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, vol. 93, no. 12, pp. 1788–1800, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. L. J. Cui, Z. Z. Lü, and X. P. Zhao, “Moment-independent importance measure of basic random variable and its probability density evolution solution,” Science China Technological Sciences, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 1138–1145, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  7. L. Cui, Z. Lu, and Q. Wang, “Parametric sensitivity analysis of the importance measure,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 28, pp. 482–491, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. P. R. Haaker and P. J. T. Verheijen, “Local and global sensitivity analysis for a reactor design with parameter uncertainty,” Chemical Engineering Research and Design, vol. 82, no. 5, pp. 591–598, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. A. Saltelli, S. Tarantola, F. Campolongo, and M. Ratto, Sensitivity Analysis in Practice: A Guide to Assessing Scientific Models, John Wiley & Sons, 2004. View at MathSciNet
  10. A. Saltelli and J. Marivoet, “Non-parametric statistics in sensitivity analysis for model output: a comparison of selected techniques,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 229–253, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J. C. Helton and F. J. Davis, “Latin hypercube sampling and the propagation of uncertainty in analyses of complex systems,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 23–69, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. H. C. Frey and S. R. Patil, “Identification and review of sensitivity analysis methods,” Risk Analysis, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 553–578, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. H. Rabitz and Ö. F. Aliş, “General foundations of high-dimensional model representations,” Journal of Mathematical Chemistry, vol. 25, no. 2-3, pp. 197–233, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  14. A. Saltelli, M. Ratto, T. Andres et al., Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 2008. View at MathSciNet
  15. I. M. Sobol, “Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates,” Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, vol. 55, no. 1–3, pp. 271–280, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  16. W. Yu and T. J. Harris, “Parameter uncertainty effects on variance-based sensitivity analysis,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 596–603, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. E. Borgonovo, “Measuring uncertainty importance: investigation and comparison of alternative approaches,” Risk Analysis, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 1349–1361, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. E. Borgonovo, W. Castaings, and S. Tarantola, “Moment independent importance measures: new results and analytical test cases,” Risk Analysis, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 404–428, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. Q. Liu and T. Homma, “A new computational method of a moment-independent uncertainty importance measure,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, vol. 94, no. 7, pp. 1205–1211, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. L. Y. Li, Z. Z. Lu, J. Feng, and B. T. Wang, “Moment-independent importance measure of basic variable and its state dependent parameter solution,” Structural Safety, vol. 38, pp. 40–47, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. P. Wei, Z. Lu, and X. Yuan, “Monte Carlo simulation for moment-independent sensitivity analysis,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, vol. 110, pp. 60–67, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. D. R. Jones, M. Schonlau, and W. J. Welch, “Efficient global optimization of expensive black-box functions,” Journal of Global Optimization, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 455–492, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  23. I. Kaymaz, “Application of kriging method to structural reliability problems,” Structural Safety, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 133–151, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. B. J. Bichon, M. S. Eldred, L. P. Swiler, S. Mahadevan, and J. M. McFarland, “Efficient global reliability analysis for nonlinear implicit performance functions,” AIAA Journal, vol. 46, no. 10, pp. 2459–2468, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. B. J. Bichon, J. M. McFarland, and S. Mahadevan, “Efficient surrogate models for reliability analysis of systems with multiple failure modes,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, vol. 96, no. 10, pp. 1386–1395, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. B. Echard, N. Gayton, and M. Lemaire, “AK-MCS: an active learning reliability method combining Kriging and Monte Carlo simulation,” Structural Safety, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 145–154, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. S. N. Lophaven, H. B. Nielsen, and J. Søndergaard, “Dace-a Matlab Kriging Toolbox, Version 2.0,” 2002.
  28. V. Dubourg, B. Sudret, and J.-M. Bourinet, “Reliability-based design optimization using kriging surrogates and subset simulation,” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 673–690, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. X. F. Yang, Y. S. Liu, Y. Gao, and Y. S. Zhang, “An active learning Kriging model for hybrid reliability analysis with both random and interval variables,” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization. In press.
  30. T. Ishigami and T. Homma, “An importance quantification technique in uncertainty analysis for computer models,” in Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis, College Park, Md, USA, December 1990.