Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 761818, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/761818
Research Article

Risk and Resilience Analysis of Complex Network Systems Considering Cascading Failure and Recovery Strategy Based on Coupled Map Lattices

School of Reliability and Systems Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China

Received 3 July 2015; Accepted 13 September 2015

Academic Editor: Mark Leeson

Copyright © 2015 Fuchun Ren et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. S. Boccaletti, V. Latora, Y. Moreno, M. Chavez, and D.-U. Hwang, “Complex networks: structure and dynamics,” Physics Reports, vol. 424, no. 4-5, pp. 175–308, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  2. R. Guimera, S. Mossa, A. Turtschi, and L. N. Amaral, “The worldwide air transportation network: anomalous centrality, community structure, and cities' global roles,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 102, no. 22, pp. 7794–7799, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  3. G. Caldarelli, Scale-Free Networks: Complex Webs in Nature and Technology, OUP Catalogue, 2007.
  4. United States-Canada Power System Outage Task Force, Final Report on the August 14th, 2003 Blackout in the United States and Canada: Causes and Recommendations, United States Department of Energy and Canadian Department of Natural Resources, 2004.
  5. P. Wallis and B. Nerlich, “Disease metaphors in new epidemics: the UK media framing of the 2003 SARS epidemic,” Social Science and Medicine, vol. 60, no. 11, pp. 2629–2639, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. E. Helleiner, “Understanding the 2007-2008 global financial crisis: Lessons for scholars of international political economy,” Annual Review of Political Science, vol. 14, pp. 67–87, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. W. H. Chen, Q. Y. Jiang, Y. J. Cao, and Z. Han, “Risk-based vulnerability assessment in complex power systems,” Power System Technology, vol. 29, no. 4, p. 3, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  8. E. Zio, “From complexity science to reliability efficiency: a new way of looking at complex network systems and critical infrastructures,” International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, vol. 3, no. 3-4, pp. 488–508, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. I. Dobson, B. A. Carreras, V. E. Lynch, and D. E. Newman, “Complex systems analysis of series of blackouts: cascading failure, critical points, and self-organization,” Chaos, vol. 17, no. 2, Article ID 026103, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. Lorenza, S. Battiston, and F. Schweitzer, “Systemic risk in a unifying framework for cascading processes on networks,” The European Physical Journal B, vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 441–460, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. L. Dueñas-Osorio and S. M. Vemuru, “Cascading failures in complex infrastructure systems,” Structural Safety, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 157–167, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. S. V. Buldyrev, R. Parshani, G. Paul, H. E. Stanley, and S. Havlin, “Catastrophic cascade of failures in interdependent networks,” Nature, vol. 464, no. 7291, pp. 1025–1028, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. K. Kaneko, “Overview of coupled map lattices,” Chaos. An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 279–282, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  14. X. F. Wang and J. Xu, “Cascading failures in coupled map lattices,” Physical Review E, vol. 70, no. 5, Article ID 056113, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. J. Xu and X. F. Wang, “Cascading failures in scale-free coupled map lattices,” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, vol. 349, no. 3-4, pp. 685–692, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. D. Cui, Z. Gao, and X. Zhao, “Cascades in small-world modular networks with CML'S method,” Modern Physics Letters B, vol. 21, no. 30, pp. 2055–2062, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  17. D. Cui, Z.-Y. Gao, and X.-M. Zhao, “Cascades with coupled map lattices in preferential attachment community networks,” Chinese Physics B, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 1703–1708, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. X. G. Chen, J. Zhou, and Z. T. Zhu, “Cascading failures study of urban traffic system based on CML,” Mathematics in Practices and Theory, vol. 39, no. 7, pp. 79–84, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  19. L. Zhao, K. Park, and Y.-C. Lai, “Attack vulnerability of scale-free networks due to cascading breakdown,” Physical Review E: Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, vol. 70, no. 3, Article ID 035101, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. J. Ash and D. Newth, “Optimizing complex networks for resilience against cascading failure,” Physica A, vol. 380, no. 1-2, pp. 673–683, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. M. Babaei, H. Ghassemieh, and M. Jalili, “Cascading failure tolerance of modular small-world networks,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs, vol. 58, no. 8, pp. 527–531, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. C. Liu, D. Li, E. Zio, and R. Kang, “A modeling framework for system restoration from cascading failures,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 12, Article ID e112363, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. M. Ouyang and Z. Wang, “Resilience assessment of interdependent infrastructure systems: with a focus on joint restoration modeling and analysis,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 141, pp. 74–82, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. D. J. Watts and S. H. Strogatz, “Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks,” Nature, vol. 393, no. 6684, pp. 440–442, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. V. Latora and M. Marchiori, “Is the Boston subway a small-world network?” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, vol. 314, no. 1–4, pp. 109–113, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. K. A. Seaton and L. M. Hackett, “Stations, trains and small-world networks,” Physica A, vol. 339, no. 3-4, pp. 635–644, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. J.-W. Wang and L.-L. Rong, “Cascade-based attack vulnerability on the US power grid,” Safety Science, vol. 47, no. 10, pp. 1332–1336, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. J.-W. Wang and L.-L. Rong, “Robustness of the western United States power grid under edge attack strategies due to cascading failures,” Safety Science, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 807–812, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. A.-L. Barabási and R. Albert, “Emergence of scaling in random networks,” Science, vol. 286, no. 5439, pp. 509–512, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus