Optimized PID Position Control of a Nonlinear System Based on Correlating the Velocity with Position Error

<div>Comparison of three ball position responses obtained with objective function OF2 and fixed values of <svg height="12.4257pt" id="M105" style="vertical-align:-3.427751pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -8.99795 14.5462 12.4257" width="14.5462pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.0135,0,0,-0.0135,0,0)"><path d="M743 650H503L496 622L527 618C563 613 564 603 532 573C449 495 371 431 323 392C301 374 272 355 246 346L280 522C297 609 300 614 379 622L385 650H135L129 622C209 614 215 609 198 522L124 133C106 39 99 35 23 28L17 0H271L277 28C193 35 192 39 208 133L239 316C264 328 280 325 303 288C368 183 435 90 502 0H652L659 28C602 34 584 43 543 94C495 154 403 283 347 369L574 554C634 603 659 612 735 624L743 650Z" id="g113-76"></path><glyph.data ascent="3473" descent="-2876" horiz-adv-x="755" vert-adv-y="755"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0095,0,0,-0.0095,9.619,3.264)"><path d="M219 86C216 168 211 250 206 337C201 410 189 448 163 448C131 448 79 396 43 344L60 322C91 359 110 375 118 375S132 358 136 298C141 238 152 81 155 -12H182C242 62 331 177 390 258C435 321 451 360 451 391C450 424 432 448 408 448C390 448 372 435 366 419C362 410 362 401 366 394C373 383 376 367 376 350C376 283 262 138 221 86H219Z" id="g185-40"></path><glyph.data ascent="989" descent="-303" horiz-adv-x="447" vert-adv-y="447"></glyph.data></g></svg>.</div>

Mathematical Problems in Engineering

fig8

Figure 8

Figure 8: Optimized PID Position Control of a Nonlinear System Based on Correlating the Velocity with Position Error 