Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2015, Article ID 797953, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/797953
Research Article

Planning Tunnel Construction Using Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC)

1Departamento de Ingeniería en Minas, Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Santiago, Chile
2Departamento de Engenharia de Minas, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil

Received 10 April 2015; Revised 9 June 2015; Accepted 14 June 2015

Academic Editor: Zdeněk Kala

Copyright © 2015 Juan P. Vargas et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. F. S. Hillier and G. Lieberman, “Markov chain,” in Introduction to Operations Research, pp. 675–682, McGraw-Hill, 9th edition, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  2. S. P. Singh and P. Xavier, “Causes, impact and control of overbreak in underground excavations,” Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 63–71, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. F. T. Suorineni, P. K. Kaiser, and J. G. Henning, “Safe rapid drifting—support selection,” Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 682–699, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. Gobierno de Chile, Código del Trabajo, Capítulo IV ‘De la jornada de trabajo’, Gobierno de Chile, 2012.
  5. N. Metropolis and S. Ulam, “The Monte Carlo method,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 44, no. 247, pp. 335–341, 1949. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. H. T. Chiwaye and T. R. Stacey, “A comparison of limit equilibrium and numerical modelling approaches to risk analysis for open pit mining,” Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, vol. 110, no. 10, pp. 571–580, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. E. Ghasemi, K. Shahriar, M. Sharifzadeh, and H. Hashemolhosseini, “Quantifying the uncertainty of pillar safety factor by Monte Carlo simulation—a case study,” Archives of Mining Sciences, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 623–635, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. R. Khalokakaie, P. A. Dowd, and R. J. Fowell, “Incorporation of slope design into optimal pit design algorithms,” Transactions of the Institution of Mining and Metallurgy Section A: Mining Technology, vol. 109, no. 2, pp. A70–A76, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. M. A. Morin and F. Ficarazzo, “Monte Carlo simulation as a tool to predict blasting fragmentation based on the Kuz-Ram model,” Computers & Geosciences, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 352–359, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. Sari, C. Karpuz, and C. Ayday, “Estimating rock mass properties using Monte Carlo simulation: ankara andesites,” Computers and Geosciences, vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 959–969, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. I. M. Sobol, A Primer for the Monte Carlo Method, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla, USA, 1994. View at MathSciNet
  12. X. Chen, “Resuing shrinkage stoping,” Engineering & Mining Journal, vol. 199, no. 10, pp. 34–36, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  13. Z. R. Bieniawski, “Rock mass classification in rock engineering,” in Proceedings of the Exploration for Rock Engineering, pp. 97–106, A.A. Balkema, Cape Town, South Africa, 1976.