Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2015, Article ID 828979, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/828979
Research Article

Limit Theorems for Local Cumulative Shock Models with Cluster Shock Structure

School of Management, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China

Received 29 November 2014; Revised 12 February 2015; Accepted 27 February 2015

Academic Editor: Daniela Boso

Copyright © 2015 Jianming Bai et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. G. K. Agrafiotis and M. Z. Tsoukalas, “On excess-time correlated cumulative processes,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 46, no. 10, pp. 1269–1280, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. J.-M. Bai, Z.-H. Li, and X.-B. Kong, “Generalized shock models based on a cluster point process,” IEEE Transactions on Reliability, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 542–550, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. A. Gut, “Cumulative shock models,” Advances in Applied Probability, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 504–507, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  4. A. Gut, “Mixed shock models,” Bernoulli, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 541–555, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  5. A. Gut and J. Hüsler, “Extreme shock models,” Extremes, vol. 2, pp. 293–305, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  6. N. Igaki, U. Sumita, and M. Kowada, “Analysis of Markov renewal shock models,” Journal of Applied Probability, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 821–831, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  7. G. Skoulakis, “A general shock model for a reliability system,” Journal of Applied Probability, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 925–935, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  8. M. Finkelstein and F. Marais, “On terminating Poisson processes in some shock models,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, vol. 95, no. 8, pp. 874–879, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. S. Mercier and H. H. Pham, “A bivariate random shock model for a two-component system with dependence,” in Proceedings of the Workshop ANR AMMSI, INSA, Toulouse, France, January 2014.
  10. E. Omey and R. Vesilo, “Local limit theorems for shock models,” HUB Research Papers 2011/23, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  11. U. Sumita and J. S. Zuo, “Correlated multivariate shock models associated with a renewal sequence and its application to analysis of browsing behavior of Internet users,” Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 119–135, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  12. Z. L. Wang, H.-Z. Huang, Y. F. Li, and N.-C. Xiao, “An approach to reliability assessment under degradation and shock process,” IEEE Transactions on Reliability, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 852–863, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J.-M. Bai, Z. G. Zhang, and Z.-H. Li, “Lifetime properties of a cumulative shock model with a cluster structure,” Annals of Operations Research, vol. 212, pp. 21–41, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  14. Y. Ogata, “Exploratory analysis of earthquake clusters by likelihood-based trigger models,” Journal of Applied Probability, vol. 38, pp. 202–212, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  15. D. J. Daley and D. Vere-Jones, An Introduction to the Theory of Point Processes, vol. 1, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 2003.
  16. N. Hohn, D. Veitch, and P. Abry, “Cluster processes: a natural language for network traffic,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 51, no. 8, pp. 2229–2244, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  17. G. Faÿ, B. González-Arévalo, T. Mikosch, and G. Samorodnitsky, “Modeling teletraffic arrivals by a Poisson cluster process,” Queueing Systems. Theory and Applications, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 121–140, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  18. T. Rolski, H. Schmidli, V. Schmidt, and J. Teugels, Stochastic Processes for Insurance and Finance, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, 1999. View at MathSciNet
  19. M. Denuit, E. Frostig, and B. Levikson, “Shifts in interest rate and common shock model for coupled lives,” Belgian Actuarial Bulletin, vol. 6, pp. 1–4, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  20. F. Lindskog and A. J. McNeil, “Common Poisson shock models: applications to insurance and credit risk modelling,” Astin Bulletin, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 209–238, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  21. R. Cont and P. Tankov, Financial Modelling with Jump Processes, Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla, USA, 2004.
  22. K.-I. Sato, Levy Processes and Infinitely Divisible Distributions, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1999. View at MathSciNet
  23. Z. Y. Lin, C. R. Lu, and Z. G. Su, Foundations of Probability Limit Theory, Higher Education Press, Beijing, China, 1999, (Chinese).
  24. P. Embrechts, C. Klüppelberg, and T. Mikosch, Modelling Extremal Events (for Insurance and Finance), Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1997.
  25. C. Klüppelberg, T. Mikosch, and A. Schärf, “Regular variation in the mean and stable limits for Poisson shot noise,” Bernoulli, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 467–496, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus