Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2015 |Article ID 864019 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/864019

Zhengwei Zhu, Jianjiang Zhou, Hongyu Chu, "Synthetic Aperture Radar Image Background Clutter Fitting Using SKS + MoM-Based Distribution", Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2015, Article ID 864019, 11 pages, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/864019

# Synthetic Aperture Radar Image Background Clutter Fitting Using SKS + MoM-Based Distribution

Revised18 Aug 2015
Accepted06 Sep 2015
Published30 Sep 2015

#### Abstract

distribution can accurately model various background clutters in the single-look and multilook synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images and is one of the most important statistic models in the field of SAR image clutter modeling. However, the parameter estimation of distribution is difficult, which greatly limits the application of the distribution. In order to solve the problem, a fast and accurate distribution parameter estimation method, which combines second-kind statistics (SKS) technique with Freitas’ method of moment (MoM), is proposed. First we deduce the first and second second-kind characteristic functions of distribution based on Mellin transform, and then the logarithm moments and the logarithm cumulants corresponding to the above-mentioned characteristic functions are derived; finally combined with Freitas’ method of moment, a simple iterative equation which is used for estimating the distribution parameters is obtained. Experimental results show that the proposed method has fast estimation speed and high fitting precision for various measured SAR image clutters with different resolutions and different number of looks.

#### 1. Introduction

SAR image background clutter statistic modeling [16] is one of the basic subjects in the SAR image interpretation such as SAR target detection and discrimination. The research on the subject has important theoretical value and wide application prospects in the automatic target detection and discrimination in high-resolution SAR images [7, 8]. Among the SAR image clutter statistic models, the modeling ability of distribution is good for the heterogeneous clutters, but it cannot fit well for extremely heterogeneous clutters [8]. distribution has a good modeling ability for homogeneous, heterogeneous, and extremely heterogeneous clutters, but the distribution only can be applied to single-look SAR images [9]. distribution, which is proposed by Frery et al. [10], not only has very strong modeling capability for the clutters with wide intensity range and different intensity uniformity but also has very good compatibility for most of clutter models. The distribution can fit various background clutter regions in the single-look and multilook SAR images well and so far it is one of the optimal statistic models in the SAR image background clutter fitting [11], but the distribution also has the defect that the parameter estimation is difficult, which has become a main technical bottleneck in a practical application of the distribution. At present, the typical distribution parameter estimation methods mainly have Freitas’ moment method [1] and Frery’s moment estimation method [10]. The shape and scale parameters of distribution are estimated by using the first-order and second-order moments in Freitas’ method, and Frery’s method realizes the parameter estimation by using 1/2- and 1/4-order moments. The former of the above-mentioned two methods is simpler; the latter needs to be solved by using a numerical method and the calculation cost is larger. But both above-mentioned methods have several common disadvantages: a priori knowledge of the SAR image needs to be used for obtaining the parameter equivalent number of looks (ENL) [12], due to the constraint of convergence condition, the full range estimation of distribution parameters cannot be realized [13, 14], and for very homogeneous clutter, the parameter ENL usually is greater than one; the estimation results of the above-mentioned two methods might be wrong [13, 14]. These defects result in that the parameters of distribution obtained by the above-mentioned two methods are not very accurate and the fitting precision of distribution for the clutters is declined. Theoretically the maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) can also be used for estimating the parameters of distribution, but its equations that are used for estimating the distribution parameters are highly nonlinear, which might cause a sharp rise in the calculation and even a wrong estimated result, so the method is rarely applied in the parameter estimation of distribution. In order to solve the distribution parameter estimation problem, by studying and analyzing the modeling principle of distribution, a new, fast, and accurate distribution parameter estimation method, which combines second-kind statistics (SKS) technique with Freitas’ method of moment (MoM), is proposed in this paper. The proposed method starts from Mellin transform, by deducing the first and second second-kind characteristic functions of distribution, the logarithm moments (log-moments), and logarithm cumulants (log-cumulants) corresponding to the characteristic functions, and then, combining with Freitas’ moment estimation method, a simple iterative equation, which is used for estimating the distribution parameters, namely, the equivalent number of looks (ENL), the shape parameter, and the scale parameter, is obtained ultimately. The method not only solves the problems that “the MoM cannot realize the full range estimation of distribution parameters” and “the MLE needs a long iterative time and the accuracy of the iteration is poor,” but, more importantly, the method considers the parameter ENL as an unknown estimated parameter like the shape and scale parameters, which can ensure that distribution has a high fitting precision for the clutters. Finally, the performance of the proposed method is compared and evaluated by using the measured SAR images with different resolutions and different number of looks. Experimental results show that not only the ENL, shape, and scale parameters can be more quickly and accurately estimated by using the proposed method but also the estimated ENL, shape, and scale parameters are more reasonable than other methods. The proposed method has a high fitting precision for the measured SAR image clutter regions with wide changes in the uniformity.

#### 2. New Parameter Estimation Method for Distribution

For a SAR intensity image, the expression of distribution is where , , , and . is the intensity of pixels. is the equivalent number of looks. is the shape parameter, which essentially reflects the uniformity of a measured clutter region. The parameter indicates that distribution can model various clutter regions with wide uniformity changes. The bigger the parameter is, the more uniform the corresponding clutter region is. is the scale parameter, which is related to the average energy of a measured clutter region. The greater the parameter is, the greater the average energy of the corresponding clutter region is.

In order to fundamentally solve the parameter estimation problem of distribution, a new estimation method of the distribution parameters , , and will be proposed in the following. What needs to be pointed out is that all the parameters are estimated based on the intensity form of distribution in the following discussion.

##### 2.1. Second-Kind Statistics Method

By analyzing the modeling principle of distribution, we found that distribution derives from the speckle model and also integrates with some characteristics of the multiplicative model. We know that the speckle noise may be considered as Mellin convolution in the Mellin transform-based second-kind statistics [46], which coincides with the SAR image multiplicative model, so it may be expected that, by imitating the solving ideas that “the first and second second-kind characteristic functions may be generated by Fourier transform and then the cumulants can be obtained by taking the derivative of the characteristic functions at zero” [15], we can derive a new parameter estimation method of distribution by using Mellin transform, which can greatly reduce the difficulty of distribution parameter estimation.

For a function with the domain , the following integral is defined as Mellin transform [46]:where the two equals signs with a Delta over them denote a definition formula of Mellin transform given behind them. We know that the domain of the probability density function of a SAR intensity image just is , so Mellin transform may be applied to analyze the SAR intensity image.

Substituting formula (1) into formula (2), we have

According to formula (3) and [16], we may obtain

By carefully observing formula (4), we can find that if we take the logarithm on both sides of the formula, this will greatly simplify the computation:where is called the second second-kind characteristic function corresponding to distribution. By taking the derivative of the function at , we have where , , are called log-cumulants.

Substituting formula (5) into formula (6), we can obtain the log-cumulants corresponding to distribution: where is called digamma function, which is the first-order derivative of logarithm gamma function. is called -order polygamma function. Obviously, formulas (7) of log-cumulants are concise and easy to be computed. More fortunately, thereto the polygamma function is a monotonic function, so formulas (7) are very suitable to be used for estimating parameters , , and of distribution.

Instead of the log-cumulants, usually the sample log-cumulants are used in a practical application. Supposing that , and are grayscale observations of sample pixels of a certain clutter region, then the formulas of sample log-cumulants may be expressed as

Combining formula (7) with formula (8), we can obtain the ultimate estimation equations of distribution parameters , , and :where (9) are called the second-kind statistics (SKS) estimator and the corresponding parameter estimation method is called the SKS method.

By analyzing the above-mentioned estimation method of distribution parameters and compared with the moment estimator and the maximum likelihood estimator, we can draw the following conclusions.

The convergence condition of obtaining formula (4) from formula (3) by integral isThe purpose of obtaining formula (4) by integral is to get the log-cumulants corresponding to distribution. We can see from formula (6) that the log-cumulants are only concerned with the derivative of at the point . When , the convergence condition (10) is obviously satisfied. So the SKS estimator successfully solves the problem that “the moment estimator cannot realize the full range estimate of distribution parameters due to the constraint of convergence condition,” which can ensure that distribution has a high fitting precision for the clutter regions with wide uniformity changes.

The moment estimator and the maximum likelihood estimator usually use a priori knowledge of a SAR image to obtain the ENL parameter or take the ISNR (inherent signal to noise ratio) [13, 17] as the ENL parameter of a SAR image. In the above-mentioned two methods to obtain parameter , the partial correlation between the samples that participate in average processing will bring the bias to the estimated parameter , which will result in the decline of the fitting precision. But the ENL parameter is considered as an unknown estimated parameter like the shape and scale parameters in the SKS estimator, so it solves the problem of the estimation bias of the ENL parameter in the moment estimator and the maximum likelihood estimator well.

We can easily see that when , it has a strong regularity between the last two equations of (9) and moreover the polygamma functions that they contain are monotonic, so the solution of the equations, namely, the estimates of the shape, scale, and ENL parameters, can be quickly and accurately obtained by using a numerical iteration method, which overcomes the defects that the maximum likelihood estimator needs a long iteration time and has a poor iteration accuracy.

When a clutter region is very homogeneous, the estimates of distribution parameters are very difficult to be obtained by using the SKS method.

Usually, a good fitting effect can be achieved by the SKS method. But in practice we found that when a clutter region is very homogeneous, the solution of (9) is very difficult to be obtained. As mentioned above, it has a strong regularity between the last two equations of (9), and moreover the function is monotonically decreasing and is close to zero with increasing of in its definition domain and the function is monotonically increasing and is close to zero with increasing of in its definition domain, so the solution of the equations, namely, the estimates of parameters , , and , can be quickly and accurately determined by using a numerical method. For (9), letwhere represents the inverse function of . It may be proved that the function is monotonically decreasing with increasing of and the function is monotonically increasing with increasing of . So in theory, the intersection of the curves and just is the estimates of parameters and that we want to obtain, and then the estimate of parameter can be obtained by substituting the estimates of parameters and into (9). However, when a clutter region is very homogeneous, the curves and would never intersect; that is to say, the solution of (9) is very difficult to be obtained. By analyzing (9) and formula (11), we can find that when a clutter region is very homogeneous, the value of will be very large and the functions and will approach zero. When , both and are constants; if , then the curves and would never intersect; that is to say, the solution of (9) is very difficult to be obtained.

So we can conclude from the above-mentioned analysis that when a clutter region is very homogeneous, the estimates of distribution parameters will be difficult to be obtained by the SKS method. It is this reason that prompts us to study a new distribution parameter estimation method.

##### 2.3. New SKS + MoM Method

The ENL is considered as a parameter to be estimated in the new method. Combining the moment estimation method proposed by Freitas and the first-order logarithm cumulant that is derived from Mellin transform, a new distribution parameter estimation method may be obtained as follows:

Using the first-order origin moment of distribution, we can obtain

Substituting formula (13) and the third formula of (12) into the first equation of (12) and simultaneously considering the constraints , , and , the solution of can be obtained by a numerical method. Substituting the solution into the third formula of (12), we can get the numerical solution of . And finally substituting solution into the second formula of (12), we can get the numerical solution of . So parameters , , and of distribution are obtained quickly and accurately by using the new method. The new method only uses first-order and second-order origin moments and a first-order log-cumulant. In addition, we can see in the following experiment that the new method is more robust than the SKS method.

What needs to be pointed out is that just as Freitas’ moment method the shape parameter in (12) still exists in the constraint , which limits the application of the new method in the fitting of extremely heterogeneous clutters. But the main purpose of the new method is to solve the distribution parameter estimation problem when the clutters are very homogeneous (at this time, ) and the SKS method is not applicable. When the clutters are so extremely heterogeneous that their actual distribution parameter , we still use the SKS method to estimate the parameters of distribution.

The proposed SKS + MoM method not only has the advantage of the SKS method that can quickly and accurately estimate the parameters of distribution but also overcomes the disadvantage of the SKS and MoM methods that when a clutter region is very homogeneous, both the SKS method and the MoM method are not applicable.

#### 3. Experimental Results and Analysis

The processing flow of the proposed method is shown in Figure 1.

At present, most of the researchers segment an image into different clutter regions according to land cover object types. So we also find the initial appropriate segmentation of an image into regions with locally homogeneous clutter according to the principle that the homogeneous clutter region contains the same land cover type in the following experiments. Figure 2 shows three MSTAR_PUBLIC_CLUTTER SAR images and a Ku-band SAR image provided by Sandia National Laboratories; the resolution of the former is 0.3 m × 0.3 m and that of the latter is 0.1 m × 0.1 m. Six typical regions in the four SAR images are selected and used for our experiments. Among them, Region 1 is a large block of cropland and it has high clutter uniformity; Region 2 is composed of woods and shadows and it is a not very uniform clutter region; Region 3 is an extremely heterogeneous clutter region, which has very complex scenes, including a large number of heterogeneous man-made and natural clutters such as cement floors, houses, and trees; Region 4 is a block of cement floor and it is a very smooth and homogeneous clutter region; Region 5 consists of grasses and scrubby bushes and it is a relatively uniform clutter region; Region 6 is a parking lot, which contains cement floors, cars, and other objects, and it is an extremely heterogeneous clutter region.

In the following experiments, first we adopt different estimation methods to obtain the parameters of lognormal distribution, gamma distribution, distribution, and distribution for the above-mentioned six clutter regions (for details, please see Tables 4(a) and 4(b)). Then we use the distributions to fit the gray histograms of the above-mentioned six regions, respectively. Finally we adopt three metrics, namely, mean square error (MSE) [4], Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) test [18], and Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence [19], to evaluate the fitting precisions of different parameter models for the above-mentioned six regions. Among the three metrics, the metric MSE reflects the average deviation between the hypothesis distribution and the actual distribution, the metric KS test reflects the maximum deviation between the hypothesis distribution and the actual distribution, and the metric KL divergence reflects the overall similarity between the hypothesis distribution and the actual distribution. There are both similarity and difference between the three metrics. They can evaluate the fitting precisions of the parameter models from different aspects. What needs to be specially pointed out is that the smaller the above-mentioned metric values are, the better the fitting precisions are.

The fitting results of the above-mentioned parameter models for the clutter regions 1–6 are shown in Figures 38, respectively. The fitting precisions are given in Tables 13.

 Parameter models Clutter regions 1 2 3 4 5 6 MoM-based lognormal 17.279 32.756 11.876 292.04 242.53 64.221 MLE-based lognormal 10.205 2.2485 5.0526 316.94 449.45 75.796 MoM-based gamma 2.0844 13.792 6.9545 114.68 171.43 104.23 MLE-based gamma 3.1056 57.116 8.1760 3682.5 3542.0 450.79 MoM-based — — 1.6403 — — — Freitas’ MoM-based 2.0843 13.792 6.9545 114.68 171.47 104.25 Fully parametric MoM-based — — 2.1876 — — 53.998 SKS-based 0.3150 9.9094 2.1815 — — 40.373 SKS + MoM-based 0.9289 30.745 8.0961 38.094 115.80 39.905
Note that the MSE values in this table need to be multiplied by 10−10.
 Parameter models Clutter regions 1 2 3 4 5 6 MoM-based lognormal 0.0674 0.0955 0.0471 0.0454 0.0471 0.0403 MLE-based lognormal 0.0601 0.0319 0.0315 0.0528 0.0780 0.0455 MoM-based gamma 0.0223 0.0432 0.0331 0.0270 0.0397 0.0560 MLE-based gamma 0.0423 0.1478 0.0564 0.2561 0.3090 0.1585 MoM-based — — 0.0150 — — — Freitas’ MoM-based 0.0223 0.0432 0.0331 0.0270 0.0396 0.0560 Fully parametric MoM-based — — 0.0175 — — 0.0358 SKS-based 0.0101 0.0472 0.0186 — — 0.0381 SKS + MoM-based 0.0151 0.0852 0.0397 0.0203 0.0257 0.0333
 Parameter models Clutter regions 1 2 3 4 5 6 MoM-based lognormal 0.3289 0.2730 0.1077 0.1708 0.2817 0.1059 MLE-based lognormal 0.1143 0.0449 0.0349 0.1503 0.2740 0.1072 MoM-based gamma 0.0333 0.0928 0.0585 0.0599 0.1517 0.1307 MLE-based gamma 0.0232 0.3943 0.0807 1.4981 1.7516 0.5517 MoM-based — — 0.0216 — — — Freitas’ MoM-based 0.0333 0.0928 0.0585 0.0599 0.1517 0.1307 Fully parametric MoM-based — — 0.0258 — — 0.0886 SKS-based 0.0055 0.0952 0.0133 — — 0.0707 SKS + MoM-based 0.0132 0.1830 0.0630 0.0081 0.0947 0.0577
(a)
 Clutter models Probability density function Moment method Maximum likelihood estimation Lognormal distribution Gamma distribution distribution — distribution
(b)
 Estimation method Estimation formula Freitas’ MoM Fully parametric MoM SKS SKS + MoM
is obtained by computing the equivalent number of looks of image, in which is the mean and is the variance of image pixel intensity or amplitude, respectively [13, 17].

We can see from Figures 38 and Tables 13 that the MoM-based distribution and the fully parametric MoM-based distribution cannot obtain correct fitting parameter estimates for Region 1 and Region 2. For Region 3, all the distributions, including the MoM-based lognormal distribution, the MLE-based lognormal distribution, the MoM-based gamma distribution, the MLE-based gamma distribution, the MoM-based distribution, Freitas’ MoM-based distribution, the fully parametric MoM-based distribution, the SKS-based distribution, and the SKS + MoM-based distribution, can obtain correct fitting parameter estimates. For Region 4 and Region 5, three methods, namely, the MoM-based distribution, the fully parametric MoM-based distribution, and the SKS-based distribution, cannot obtain correct fitting parameter estimates. For Region 6, only the MoM-based distribution cannot obtain correct fitting parameter estimates.

In addition, we can see from Figures 38 and Tables 13 the following. As a whole, the fitting effects of distribution are superior to those of other distributions. Assuming that is known or obtained by the given SAR image, Freitas’ method, which uses the first-order and second-order moments to realize the estimation of distribution parameters and , has relatively wide versatility, but its estimation precision is not high. The SKS method has no solution for the regions where the clutters are relatively uniform. This is exactly the problem to be solved by the proposed method. The proposed SKS + MoM method can realize the unity of versatility and precision well. Whatever ground object clutter or SAR image resolution, the method can obtain relatively accurate parameter estimates and good fitting results. However, we also note that the fitting precisions of the proposed method are not very high for Region 2 and Region 3; it is because the clutters in the two regions are so extremely heterogeneous that the actual values of the shape parameter exceed the application scope of the method , which are also verified by values that are estimated by the SKS method. It should be pointed out that different scenes and different regions of the same scene have different gray histograms, so the same fitting approach will have different fitting effects for different scenes and different regions of the same scene. So it is necessary for us to build a specific fitting model for a specific application.

#### 4. Concluding Remarks

A SKS + MoM-based distribution parameter estimation method has been proposed. The proposed method successfully solves the problems that “the MoM cannot realize the full range estimation of distribution parameters” and “the MLE method needs a long iterative time and has the poor iteration accuracy.” More importantly, the method considers the ENL parameter as an unknown estimated parameter like the shape and scale parameters, which can ensure that distribution has higher fitting precision. The method not only has the advantage of the SKS method that can quickly and accurately estimate the parameters of distribution but also overcomes the disadvantage of both SKS method and MoM method that are not applicable when the clutters are very homogeneous. Experimental results verify the effectiveness of the proposed method in the SAR image background clutter modeling. The clutter statistic model based on the proposed method can be widely used for the SAR image interpretation such as SAR target detection and discrimination in the future research.

#### Description

In the expressions in Tables 4(a) and 4(b), and denote the intensity or amplitude of pixels. and denote the mean and variance of image pixel intensity or amplitude, respectively. denotes the total number of pixels that participate in the operation. is called the gamma function, is called the digamma function, and is called the -order -class Bessel function. is the equivalent number of looks, is the shape parameter, and is the scale parameter of distribution. is the first-order sample log-cumulant.

#### Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

#### Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the anonymous referees for their valuable comments and suggestions. This research is partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61105020) and Key Research Platform for Research Projects (13zxtk08).

#### References

1. C. C. Freitas, A. C. Frery, and A. H. Correia, “The polarimetric $\mathcal{G}$ distribution for SAR data analysis,” Environmetries, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 13–31, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
2. T. Eltoft, “Modeling the amplitude statistics of ultrasonic images,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 229–240, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
3. M. S. Greco and F. Gini, “Statistical analysis of high-resolution SAR ground clutter data,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 566–575, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
4. C. Tison, J.-M. Nicolas, F. Tupin, and H. Maître, “A new statistical model for Markovian classification of urban areas in high-resolution SAR images,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 42, no. 10, pp. 2046–2057, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
5. J. M. Nicolas and F. Tupin, “Gamma mixture modeled with ‘second kind statistics’: application to SAR image processing,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS '02), pp. 2489–2491, June 2002. View at: Google Scholar
6. R. Abdelfattah and J.-M. Nicolas, “Interferometric SAR coherence magnitude estimation using second kind statistics,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 44, no. 7, pp. 1942–1953, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
7. Y. Li, S.-X. Wang, K.-F. Ji, and Y. Su, “A new method of automatic target discrimination in high-resolution SAR image,” Journal of National University of Defense Technology, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 81–84, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
8. S. Kuttikkad and R. Chellappa, “Non-Gaussian CFAR techniques for target detection in high resolution SAR images,” in Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Image Processing, pp. 910–914, Austin, Tex, USA, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
9. J. S. Salazar and D. R. Hush, “Statistical modeling of target and clutter in single-look non-polorimetric SAR imagery,” in Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference on Signal and Image Processing, pp. 272–276, Las Vegas, Nev, USA, October 1998. View at: Google Scholar
10. A. C. Frery, H.-J. Müller, C. D. C. F. Yanasse, and S. J. S. Sant'Anna, “A model for extremely heterogeneous clutter,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 648–659, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
11. G. Gao, M. Lu, J. J. Huang, G. Y. Kuang, and D. R. Li, “Statistical analysis of clutter in high-resolution SAR images,” Signal Processing, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 648–654, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
12. C. H. Gierull and I. C. Sikaneta, “Estimating the effective number of looks in interferometric SAR data,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 40, no. 8, pp. 1733–1742, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
13. W. Z. Li, X. S. Ku, J. H. Cheng, and J. C. Wang, “A new G0 distribution parameter estimation method for SAR images,” in Proceedings of the 11th National Radar Academic Conference, pp. 210–214, November 2010. View at: Google Scholar
14. G. T. Shi, G. Gao, X. G. Zhou, G. Y. Kuang, and Y. M. Jiang, “The Mellin transform-based G0 distribution parameter estimation method,” Progress in Natural Science, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 677–684, June 2009. View at: Google Scholar
15. K. Huangfu, J. W. Chen, S. Q. Lou et al., Modern Digital Signal Processing, chapter 6, Publishing House of Electronics Industry, Beijing, China, 2012.
16. L. X. Wang, D. Z. Fang, M. Y. Zang et al., Handbook of Mathematics, chapter 5, Higher Education Press, Beijing, China, 1979.
17. G. Franceschetti and R. Lanari, Synthetic Aperture Radar Processing, chapter 1, CRC Press, Rome, Italy, 1999.
18. G. Gao, The research on automatic acquirement of target's ROI from SAR imagery [Ph.D. thesis], National University of Defense Technology, Changsha, China, 2007.
19. M. D. DcVore and J. A. O'Sullivan, “Statistical assessment of model fit for synthetic aperture radar data,” in Algorithms for Synthetic Aperture Radar Imagery VIII, vol. 4382 of Proceedings of SPIE, Orlando, Fla, USA, April 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2015 Zhengwei Zhu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.