Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2015, Article ID 914108, 13 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/914108
Research Article

A Network-Based Data Envelope Analysis Model in a Dynamic Balanced Score Card

1Department of Industrial Engineering, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran
2School of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
3Department of Mathematics, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran

Received 17 October 2014; Revised 20 December 2014; Accepted 2 March 2015

Academic Editor: Pandian Vasant

Copyright © 2015 Mojtaba Akbarian et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. S. Kaplan and D. P. Norton, “Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system,” Harvard Business Review, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 70–82, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  2. V. Nissen, “Modeling corporate strategy with the fuzzy balanced scorecard,” in Proceedings of the Symposium on Fuzzy Systems in Computer Science (FSCS '06), E. Hüllermeier, R. Kruse, A. Nürnberger, and J. Strackeljan, Eds., pp. 121–138, Magdeburg, Germany, 2006.
  3. R. S. Kaplan and D. P. Norton, “The strategy map: guide to aligning intangible assets,” Strategy & Leadership, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 10–17, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. M. L. Frigo, P. G. Pustorino, and G. W. Krull, “The balanced scorecard for community banks: translating strategy into action,” Bank Accounting and Finance, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 17–29, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  5. P. Rouse, M. Putterill, and D. Ryan, “Integrated performance measurement design: insights from an application in aircraft maintenance,” Management Accounting Research, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 229–248, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. H. Eilat, B. Golany, and A. Shtub, “R&D project evaluation: an integrated DEA and balanced scorecard approach,” Omega, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 895–912, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. H. Eilat, B. Golany, and A. Shtub, “Constructing and evaluating balanced portfolios of R&D projects with interactions: a DEA based methodology,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 172, no. 3, pp. 1018–1039, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. T.-Y. Chen, C.-B. Chen, and S.-Y. Peng, “Firm operation performance analysis using data envelopment analysis and balanced scorecard: a case study of a credit cooperative bank,” International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, vol. 57, no. 7, pp. 523–539, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. T. García-Valderrama, E. Mulero-Mendigorri, and D. Revuelta-Bordoy, “Relating the perspectives of the balanced scorecard for R&D by means of DEA,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 196, no. 3, pp. 1177–1189, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. C. Y. Chiang and B. Lin, “An integration of balanced scorecards and data envelopment analysis for firm's benchmarking management,” Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, vol. 20, no. 11, pp. 1153–1172, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. A. Maced, A. C. Barbosa, and G. T. Cavalcante, “Performance of bank branches in Brazil: applying data envelopment analysis (DEA) to indicators related to the BSC perspectives,” E&G—Revista Economia e Gestão, vol. 19, no. 19, pp. 65–84, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  12. A. Asosheh, S. Nalchigar, and M. Jamporazmey, “Information technology project evaluation: an integrated data envelopment analysis and balanced scorecard approach,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 5931–5938, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. C. A. F. Amado, S. P. Santos, and P. M. Marques, “Integrating the data envelopment analysis and the balanced scorecard approaches for enhanced performance assessment,” Omega, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 390–403, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. S. M. Seyedhosseini, A. E. Taleghani, A. Bakhsha, and S. Partovi, “Extracting leanness criteria by employing the concept of balanced scorecard,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 10454–10461, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. E. Falatoonitoosi, Z. Leman, and S. Sorooshian, “Casual strategy mapping using integrated BSC and MCDM DEMATEL,” Journal of American Science, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 125–155, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  16. J.-S. Horng, C.-H. Liu, S.-F. Chou, and C.-Y. Tsai, “Creativity as a critical criterion for future restaurant space design: developing a novel model with DEMATEL application,” International Journal of Hospitality Management, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 96–105, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. M. N. Shaik and W. Abdul-Kader, “Comprehensive performance measurement and causal-effect decision making model for reverse logistics enterprise,” Computers and Industrial Engineering, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 87–103, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. J. Jassbi, F. Mohamadnejad, and H. Nasrollahzadeh, “A fuzzy DEMATEL framework for modeling cause and effect relationships of strategy map,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 5967–5973, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. S. A. Heydariyeh, M. Javidnia, and A. Mehdiabadi, “A new approach to analyze strategy map using an integrated BSC and FUZZY DEMATEL,” Management Science Letters, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 161–170, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. C. Chen and H. Yan, “Network DEA model for supply chain performance evaluation,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 213, no. 1, pp. 147–155, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  21. M. Alvandi, S. Fazli, L. Yazdani, and M. Aghaee, “An integrated MCDM method in ranking BSC perspectives and key performance indicators (KPIs),” Management Science Letters, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 995–1004, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. D. J.-F. Jeng and G.-H. Tzeng, “Social influence on the use of clinical decision support systems: revisiting the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology by the fuzzy DEMATEL technique,” Computers and Industrial Engineering, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 819–828, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. J. Ren, A. Manzardo, S. Toniolo, and A. Scipioni, “Sustainability of hydrogen supply chain. Part I: identification of critical criteria and cause-effect analysis for enhancing the sustainability using DEMATEL,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 38, no. 33, pp. 14159–14171, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. J. S. Horng, C. H. Liu, S. F. Chou, and C. Y. Tsai, “Creativity as a critical criterion for future restaurant space design: developing a novel model with DEMATEL application,” International Journal of Hospitality Management, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 96–105, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. C. Kao, “Network data envelopment analysis: a review,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 239, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  26. L. M. Seiford and J. Zhu, “Profitability and marketability of the top 55 U.S. commercial banks,” Management Science, vol. 45, no. 9, pp. 1270–1288, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. Z. Yang, “A two-stage DEA model to evaluate the overall performance of Canadian life and health insurance companies,” Mathematical and Computer Modelling, vol. 43, no. 7-8, pp. 910–919, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. C. Kao and S.-N. Hwang, “Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: an application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 185, no. 1, pp. 418–429, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. Y.-C. Chiou, L. W. Lan, and B. T. H. Yen, “A joint measurement of efficiency and effectiveness for non-storable commodities: integrated data envelopment analysis approaches,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 201, no. 2, pp. 477–489, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. Y. Chen, W. D. Cook, and J. Zhu, “Deriving the DEA frontier for two-stage processes,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 202, no. 1, pp. 138–142, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. Y.-M. Wang and K.-S. Chin, “Some alternative DEA models for two-stage process,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 37, no. 12, pp. 8799–8808, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. C. Kao and S.-N. Hwang, “Decomposition of technical and scale efficiencies in two-stage production systems,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 211, no. 3, pp. 515–519, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  33. H. F. Lewis, S. Mallikarjun, and T. R. Sexton, “Unoriented two-stage DEA: the case of the oscillating intermediate products,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 229, no. 2, pp. 529–539, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. A. Charnes, W. W. Cooper, B. Golany, R. Halek, G. Klopp, and E. Schmitz, “Two-phase data envelopment analysis approaches to policy evaluation and management of army recruiting activities: tradeoffs between joint services and army advertising,” Research Report CCS #532, Center for Cybernetic Studies. University of Texas-Austin, Austin, Tex, USA, 1986. View at Google Scholar
  35. C. Kao and S.-N. Hwang, “Efficiency measurement for network systems: IT impact on firm performance,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 437–446, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. Y. Chen, J. Du, H. D. Sherman, and J. Zhu, “D{EA} model with shared resources and efficiency decomposition,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 207, no. 1, pp. 339–349, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  37. L. Liang, Z.-Q. Li, W. D. Cook, and J. Zhu, “Data envelopment analysis efficiency in two-stage networks with feedback,” IIE Transactions, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 309–322, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. B. C. Xie, Y. Fan, and Q. Q. Qu, “Does generation form influence environmental efficiency performance? An analysis of China's power system,” Applied Energy, vol. 96, pp. 261–271, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. S. Lozano, E. Gutiérrez, and P. Moreno, “Network DEA approach to airports performance assessment considering undesirable outputs,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 1665–1676, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. J. Nouri, F. H. Lotfi, H. Borgheipour, F. Atabi, S. M. Sadeghzadeh, and Z. Moghaddas, “An analysis of the implementation of energy efficiency measures in the vegetable oil industry of Iran: a data envelopment analysis approach,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 52, pp. 84–93, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. C. Kao and S.-T. Liu, “Multi-period efficiency measurement in data envelopment analysis: the case of Taiwanese commercial banks,” Omega, vol. 47, pp. 90–98, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. C. Kao, “Efficiency measurement for parallel production systems,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 196, no. 3, pp. 1107–1112, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. G. Bi, C. Feng, J. Ding, and M. R. Khan, “Estimating relative efficiency of DMU: Pareto principle and Monte Carlo oriented DEA approach,” Information Systems and Operational Research, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 44–57, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  44. N. Adler, V. Liebert, and E. Yazhemsky, “Benchmarking airports from a managerial perspective,” Omega, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 442–458, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. C.-H. Wang, Y.-H. Lu, C.-W. Huang, and J.-Y. Lee, “R&D, productivity, and market value: an empirical study from high-technology firms,” Omega, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 143–155, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. T.-Y. Lin and S.-H. Chiu, “Using independent component analysis and network DEA to improve bank performance evaluation,” Economic Modelling, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 608–616, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. G. Klepac, “Risk evaluation in the insurance company using REFII model,” Intelligent techniques in recommendation systems: contextual advancements and new methods, pp. 84–104, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. C. L. Lin and W. W. Wu, “A fuzzy extension of the DEMATEL method for group decision making,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 156, Article ID 445455, pp. 445–455, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  49. W.-S. Lee, A. Y. Huang, Y.-Y. Chang, and C.-M. Cheng, “Analysis of decision making factors for equity investment by DEMATEL and analytic network process,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 8375–8383, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus