Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 931048, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/931048
Research Article

Assembly Line Productivity Assessment by Comparing Optimization-Simulation Algorithms of Trajectory Planning for Industrial Robots

Centro de Investigación en Ingeniería Mecánica (CIIM), Universitat Politècnica de València-Camino de Vera s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain

Received 25 July 2014; Revised 20 September 2014; Accepted 22 September 2014

Academic Editor: Shaofan Li

Copyright © 2015 Francisco Rubio et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. E. Bobrow, S. Dubowsky, and J. S. Gibson, “Time-optimal control of robotic manipulators along specied paths,” International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 3–17, 1985. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. K. G. Shin and N. D. McKay, “Minimum -time control of robotic manipulators with geometric path constraints,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. AC-30, no. 6, pp. 531–541, 1985. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. Y. Chen and A. A. Desrochers, “Structure of minimum-time control law for robotic manipulators with constrained paths,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 971–976, Scottsdale, Ariz, USA, May 1989. View at Scopus
  4. J. Mattmüller and D. Gisler, “Calculating a near time-optimal jerk-constrained trajectory along a specified smooth path,” International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 45, no. 9-10, pp. 1007–1016, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. K. J. Kyriakopoulos and G. N. Saridis, “Minimum jerk path generation,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, vol. 1, pp. 364–369, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. D. Simon and C. Işık, “A trigonometric trajectory generator for robotic arms,” International Journal of Control, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 505–517, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  7. D. Constantinescu and E. A. Croft, “Smooth and time-optimal trajectory planning for industrial manipulators along specified paths,” Journal of Robotic Systems, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 233–249, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  8. P. Huang, Y. Xu, and B. Liang, “Global minimum-jerk trajectory planning of space manipulator,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 405–413, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. D. Garg and C. Ruengcharungpong, “Force balance and energy optimization in cooperating manipulators,” in Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Pittsburgh Modeling and Simulation Conference, pp. 2017–2024, Pittsburgh, Pa, USA, 1992.
  10. A. R. Hirakawa and A. Kawamura, “Proposal of trajectory generation for redundant manipulators using variational approach applied to minimization of consumed electrical energy,” in Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Advanced Motion Control (AMC '96), pp. 687–692, Mie, Japan, March 1996. View at Scopus
  11. B. H. Cho, B. S. Choi, and J. M. Lee, “Time-optimal trajectory planning for a robot system under torque and impulse constraints,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 10–16, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. G. Field and Y. Stepanenko, “Iterative dynamic programming: an approach to minimum energy trajectory planning for robotic manipulators,” in Proceedings of the 13th IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 2755–2760, Minneapolis, Minn, USA, April 1996. View at Scopus
  13. X. F. Zha, “Optimal pose trajectory planning for robot manipulators,” Mechanism and Machine Theory, vol. 37, no. 10, pp. 1063–1086, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  14. F. Valero, V. Mata, and A. Besa, “Trajectory planning in workspaces with obstacles taking into account the dynamic robot behaviour,” Mechanism and Machine Theory, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 525–536, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  15. F. J. Valero, J. L. Suñer, V. Mata, and F. J. Rubio, “Optimal time trajectory for robots with torque jerk and energy constraints,” in Proceedings of the ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Multibody Dynamics, 2009.
  16. F. Rubio, F. Valero, J. Sunyer, and V. Mata, “Direct step-by-step method for industrial robot path planning,” Industrial Robot, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 594–607, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. J. L. Suñer, F. J. Valero, J. J. Ródenas, and A. Besa, “Comparación entre procedimientos de solución de la interpolación por funciones splines para la planificación de trayectorias de robots industriales,” in Proceedings of the 8th Congreso Iberoamericano de Ingeniería Mecánica, Cusco, Peru, October 2007.
  18. R. Sanders, “The pareto principle: its use and abuse,” Journal of Product & Brand Management, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 37–40, 1992. View at Google Scholar