Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 956757, 14 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/956757
Research Article

A Novel AHP-Based Benefit Evaluation Model of Military Simulation Training Systems

1Department of Management Sciences, R.O.C. Military Academy, Kaohsiung 830, Taiwan
2Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan

Received 1 July 2014; Accepted 22 December 2014

Academic Editor: Guangming Xie

Copyright © 2015 Kuei-Hu Chang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. Tavana and A. Hatami-Marbini, “A group AHP-TOPSIS framework for human spaceflight mission planning at NASA,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 13588–13603, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. M. Cong, D. Liu, Y. Du, H. Y. Wen, and Y. H. Wu, “Application of triune parallel-serial robot system for full-mission tank training,” Industrial Robot, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 533–544, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. C. K. Lam, K. Sundaraj, and M. N. Sulaiman, “A review of computer-generated simulation in the pedagogy of cataract surgery training and assessment,” International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 29, no. 10, pp. 661–669, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. N. Ivankovic, D. Rajic, M. Ilic, M. Vitorovic-Todorovic, and N. Pajic, “Testing of the efficiency of military devices for personal respiratory protection in relation to sub-micron particles of biological agents,” Digest Journal of Nanomaterials and Biostructures, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 1089–1095, 2012. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. Sullivan, J. H. Yang, M. Day, and Q. Kennedy, “Training simulation for helicopter navigation by characterizing visual scan patterns,” Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine, vol. 82, no. 9, pp. 871–878, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. J. Vogel-Walcutt, L. Fiorella, and N. Malone, “Instructional strategies framework for military training systems,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 1490–1498, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. Z. Wang and J. Wang, “Guided bomb release planning based on Monte Carlo in a distributed virtual environment,” Aeronautical Journal, vol. 117, no. 1192, pp. 585–602, 2013. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. Pelakauskas, A. Auzans, E. A. Schneider, and A. H. Tkaczyk, “Autonomous dynamic decision making in a nuclear fuel cycle simulator,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 262, pp. 358–364, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. M. Itoh, T. Horikome, and T. Inagaki, “Effectiveness and driver acceptance of a semi-autonomous forward obstacle collision avoidance system,” Applied Ergonomics, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 756–763, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. N. Goode, P. M. Salmon, and M. G. Lenné, “Simulation-based driver and vehicle crew training: applications, efficacy and future directions,” Applied Ergonomics, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 435–444, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. M. Amick, M. Kraft, and R. Mcglinchey, “Driving simulator performance of veterans from the Iraq and Afghanistan wars,” Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 463–470, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. T. L. Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 1980. View at MathSciNet
  13. T. L. Saaty, “How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 9–26, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  14. M. Braglia, “MAFMA: multi-attribute failure mode analysis,” International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 1017–1033, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. Bosch-Mauchand, A. Siadat, N. Perry, and A. Bernard, “VCS: value chains simulator, a tool for value analysis of manufacturing enterprise processes (a value-based decision support tool),” Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 1389–1402, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. Z. P. Ding, S. K. Srivastava, D. A. Cartes, and S. Suryanarayanan, “Dynamic simulation-based analysis of a new load shedding scheme for a notional destroyer-class shipboard power system,” IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 1166–1174, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. H. Lu, G. Yi, J. Tan, and Z. Liu, “Collision avoidance decision-making model of multi-agents in virtual driving environment with analytic hierarchy process,” Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 47–52, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. J. A. Martilla and J. C. James, “Importance-performance analysis,” Journal of Marketing, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 77–79, 1977. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. C.-C. Chou and J.-F. Ding, “Application of an integrated model with MCDM and IPA to evaluate the service quality of transshipment port,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2013, Article ID 656757, 7 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. W.-C. Lin, “Balanced scorecard and IPA enables public service in township management: local government performance,” Lex Localis, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 21–32, 2013. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. S.-H. Chen, “Improvement strategies for the tools and techniques of quality improvement: utilization of a performance evaluation matrix in the Taiwanese high-tech industry,” Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 340–350, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. L.-H. Ho, S.-Y. Feng, Y.-C. Lee, and T.-M. Yen, “Using modified IPA to evaluate supplier's performance: multiple regression analysis and DEMATEL approach,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 39, no. 8, pp. 7102–7109, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. F. Herrera and L. Martinez, “A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 746–752, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. J.-H. Wang and J. Y. Hao, “Fuzzy linguistic PERT,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 133–144, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. J. M. Moreno, J. M. M. del Castillo, C. Porcel, and E. Herrera-Viedma, “A quality evaluation methodology for health-related websites based on a 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic approach,” Soft Computing, vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 887–897, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. L. Martínez, “Sensory evaluation based on linguistic decision analysis,” International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 148–164, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. K.-H. Chang and T.-C. Wen, “A novel efficient approach for DFMEA combining 2-tuple and the OWA operator,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 2362–2370, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. L. Martínez, J. Liu, D. Ruan, and J.-B. Yang, “Dealing with heterogeneous information in engineering evaluation processes,” Information Sciences, vol. 177, no. 7, pp. 1533–1542, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. T. L. Saaty, “Rank from comparisons and from ratings in the analytic hierarchy/network processes,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 168, no. 2, pp. 557–570, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  30. A. Ray, B. Sarkar, and S. Sanyal, “The TOC-based algorithm for solving multiple constraint resources,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 301–309, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  31. L. A. Zadeh, “The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning—I,” vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 199–249, 1975. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  32. K.-H. Chang, “A more general risk assessment methodology using a soft set-based ranking technique,” Soft Computing, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 169–183, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus