Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2015, Article ID 960973, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/960973
Research Article

Failure Probability Model considering the Effect of Intermediate Principal Stress on Rock Strength

College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China

Received 8 July 2015; Revised 1 November 2015; Accepted 8 November 2015

Academic Editor: Yakov Strelniker

Copyright © 2015 Yonglai Zheng and Shuxin Deng. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. C. Chang and B. Haimson, “True triaxial strength and deformability of the German Continental Deep Drilling Program (KTB) deep hole amphibolite,” Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, vol. 105, no. 8, pp. 18999–19013, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. B. Haimson, “True triaxial stresses and the brittle fracture of rock,” in Rock Damage and Fluid Transport, Part I, Pageoph Topical Volumes, pp. 1101–1130, Birkhäuser, Basel, Switzerland, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. B. C. Haimson and C. Chang, “True triaxial strength of the KTB amphibolite under borehole wall conditions and its use to estimate the maximum horizontal in situ stress,” Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, vol. 107, no. 10, pp. 15.1–15.14, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. K. Mogi, “Fracture and flow of rocks under high triaxial compression,” Journal of Geophysical Research, vol. 76, no. 5, pp. 1255–1269, 1971. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. M. Takahashi and H. Koide, “Effect of the intermediate principal stress on strength and deformation behavior of sedimentary rocks at the depth shallower than 2000 m,” in Proceedings of the ISRM International Symposium, ISRM-IS-1989-003, International Society for Rock Mechanics, Pau, France, August 1989, https://www.onepetro.org/conference-paper/ISRM-IS-1989-003.
  6. M. You, “True-triaxial strength criteria for rock,” International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 115–127, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. M. Cai, “Influence of intermediate principal stress on rock fracturing and strength near excavation boundaries—insight from numerical modeling,” International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 763–772, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. L. Shi and X.-C. Li, “Analysis of end friction effect in true triaxial test,” Rock and Soil Mechanics, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 1159–1164, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. C. Tang, Rock Failure Mechanisms, CRC Press, 2010, http://cds.cern.ch/record/1614355.
  10. P.-Z. Pan, X.-T. Feng, and J. A. Hudson, “The influence of the intermediate principal stress on rock failure behaviour: a numerical study,” Engineering Geology, vol. 124, no. 1, pp. 109–118, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. E. Fjær and H. Ruistuen, “Impact of the intermediate principal stress on the strength of heterogeneous rock,” Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, vol. 107, no. 2, pp. ECV 3.1–ECV 3.10, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. W. Weibull, “A statistical theory of the strength of materials,” Journal of Applied Mechanics, vol. 18, pp. 293–297, 1951. View at Google Scholar
  13. A. M. Freudenthal, “Statistical approach to brittle fracture,” in Fracture, H. Liebowitz, Ed., vol. 2, pp. 591–619, 1968. View at Google Scholar
  14. Z. P. Bažant, “Size effect on structural strength: a review,” Archive of Applied Mechanics, vol. 69, no. 9-10, pp. 703–725, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. R. Wisnom, “Relationship between strength variability and size effect in unidirectional carbon fibre/epoxy,” Composites, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 47–52, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. Z. P. Bazant, Y. Xi, and S. G. Reid, “Statistical size effect in quasi-brittle structures. I. Is Weibull theory applicable?” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, vol. 117, no. 11, pp. 2609–2622, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. M. E. Saleh, J. L. Beuth, and M. P. de Boer, “Validated prediction of the strength size effect in polycrystalline silicon using the three-parameter weibull function,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 97, no. 12, pp. 3982–3990, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. D. C. Drucker, Some Implications of Work Hardening and Ideal Plasticity, Division of Applied Mathematics, Brown University, 1949.
  19. S. A. F. Murrell, “A criterion for brittle fracture of rocks and concrete under triaxial stress and the effect of pore pressure on the criterion,” in Proceedings of the 5th Rock Mechanics Symposium, pp. 563–577, 1963.
  20. M.-H. Yu, “Twin shear stress yield criterion,” International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 71–74, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar